Advanced Search Results
Larsen and Toubro Ltd. and ors. Vs. State of Bihar and ors.
Patna
Jul-19-1999
Sales Tax
Constitution of India - Articles 286 and 366(29A); Bihar Finance Act, 1981 - Sections 2, 25A, 25A(2) and 25A(7); Bihar Taxation Laws (Amendment and Validation) Act, 1993; Central Sales Tax Act, Sections 3, 4, 5, 14 and 15
Sachchida Nand Jha, J. 1. The vires of Section 25-A of the Bihar Finance Act, 1981 and the related rules and notification regarding deduction of sales tax at source from the contractors' bills … in the context of unamended provisions in the case of Geeta Prasad Singh and Co. v. State [1986] 63 STC 337 (Pat) rendered prior to the decision of the Supreme Court in Builders Association case [1989] 73
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState Bank of India Staff Co-operative Society Ltd. Vs. Income-tax Off ...
Chennai
Nov-28-1997
Direct Taxation
(1998)144CTR(Mad)240
of banking not being a co-operative society providing credit facilities to farmers or village artisans (omitted by the Finance Act, 1992, w.e.f. 1st April, 1993).(ii) a public financial institution as defined in s. 4A of the Companies Act, 1956 … itself only to the common issues.17. In terms of sub-s. (2) of s. 4 which is the charging section in respect of credit institutions other than the scheduled banks, interest shall be charged on every credit institution
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSri Parimal and anr. Vs. State and ors.
Patna
Feb-18-2000
Civil
30.11.1994 on payment of 5.5 lacs. According to the petitioners, in view of the provisions of the Bihar Finance Act, 1981 (Part II) (In short 'the Finance Act'), they had obtained permission of the Sales Tax Department for … carrying on business of advertising agency, Petitioner in C.W.J.C. No. 8265 of 1992 was a lessee of the District Board for five years with effect … published in a 'newspaper' or broadcast by radio or television-and any advertisement exhibited or broadcast by any political party.Section 63 of the said Act provides for levy of tax. The explanation appended to the said provisions reads thus:'The
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Life Insurance Corporation of India Vs. Joint Cit
Mumbai
Mar-20-2001
Direct Taxation
(2002)74TTJ(Mumbai)624
securities is intended to be taxed under the provisions of the Interest Tax Act (45/1974) as amended by Finance Act, 1992. As stated earlier, exclusion of interest on securities from the taxability to Interest Tax Act led to ambiguity. … interest under the Act as the same could not be classified as interest on loans and advances under section 2(7) of the Interest Tax Act, 1974 (as amended by the Finance Act, 1994).4. Assessing officer in the … the case of Punjab Co-operative Bank Ltd. v. CIT (1940) 8 ITR 635, of the Andhra Pradesh High Court in the case of Andhra Pradesh
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Askishar Dass Sahni and Sons Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax
Delhi
May-22-2000
Direct Taxation
(2000)68TTJ(Del)125
80J(6A), for deciding the question whether a statute is mandatory or directory. It was stressed that by the Finance Act, 1992, a totally new scheme and procedure for assessment of firms were introduced for the first time from assessment … be relevant to extract below the headnote of the decision at pp. 63 and 64 :'It is well settled that the question whether a statute … the course of assessment proceedings.(4) That the learned Commissioner (Appeals) has failed to appreciate that the provisions of section 184(2) cannot be regarded as mandatory and absolute in nature so as to disentitle the claim of firm,
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJt. Cit Vs. Groz Backert Asia Ltd.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Chandigarh
Aug-28-2002
Direct Taxation
(2003)86ITD291(Chd.)
of deduction provided by sub-section (3) for several years was not considered sufficient and through amendment made by Finance Act, 1992, it has been thought proper by legislature to increase the amount of deduction by 90 per cent of … Hon'ble Allahabad High Court in the case of Modi Spinning & Weaving Industry v. ITO (1975) 101 ITR 637 (All) has held that at any particular stage of the assessment proceedings the assessee would be bound to
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShri M.U. Joshi Vs. the Tax Recovery Officer,
Mumbai
Sep-20-2005
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 143(3) and 245I; Finance Act, 1992; Income Tax Rules - Rules 57, 58, 63(1), 68B, 68B(1) and 68B(2)
2005(6)BomCR17; (2005)199CTR(Bom)249; [2006]281ITR289(Bom); 2006(1)MhLj95
liable to be vacated. 10. Rule 68B was introduced in the Second Schedule to the I.T. Act by Finance Act, 1992 specifically with a view to prescribe time limit of three years for sale of attached immovable properties. Proviso … of M/s. Joychem Chemical & Pharmaceuticals Industries ('the firm' for short). Pursuant to the assessment orders passed under section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act ('I.T. Act' for short) for A.Y.86-87 and 87-88, huge demands were raised … flat for Rs.10,00,000/- in favour of the Government of India under Rule 63(1) of the Second Schedule to the I.T. Act. Challenging the aforesaid confirmation
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskVijay Remedies Ltd. and ors. Vs. Securities and Exchange Board of Indi ...
SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT
Feb-11-2005
MRTP
"I, in exercise of powers conferred under Section 4(3) of SEBI Act1992, read with Section 11B of SEBI Act, 1992 and Regulation 12 of SEBI (Prohibition of Fraudulent and Unfair Trade Practices relating to Securities Market) Regulations, 1995, … were made to induce the investors to subscribe to the public issue & thus are in violation of section 63 & 68 of the Companies Act, 1956. (ii) The misutilisation of issue proceeds cornering VRL shares with the … Respondent a detailed confession and information/statement about grey market operations, primary market financing and price rigging in the secondary market which included: (i) Photocopies of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskChidananda Urs B.g Vs. The State Of Karnataka
Karnataka
Aug-11-2022
Land Acquisition
05.12.2002.67. It is also stated in the objections that in the year 1992, the Government by executive order, created a Bureau of Investigation (BOI) in … of A.P. Lokayukta UpaLokayukta & Others v. T. Rama Subba Reddy & Another15 (Para17) and the mandate of Section 63 of the Lokpal and Lokayukta Act, 2013, any effort to disband the Institution of the Karnataka Lokayukta will … of the Head of the Department was also withdrawn. The Registrar, Karnataka Lokayukta, was authorized to operate the finances of the Police wing. This action of the Government brought the ‘police wing' under the administrative and financial
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSri. K.t. Nagaraja Vs. The State Of Karnataka
Karnataka
Aug-11-2022
Land Acquisition
05.12.2002.67. It is also stated in the objections that in the year 1992, the Government by executive order, created a Bureau of Investigation (BOI) in … of A.P. Lokayukta UpaLokayukta & Others v. T. Rama Subba Reddy & Another15 (Para17) and the mandate of Section 63 of the Lokpal and Lokayukta Act, 2013, any effort to disband the Institution of the Karnataka Lokayukta will … of the Head of the Department was also withdrawn. The Registrar, Karnataka Lokayukta, was authorized to operate the finances of the Police wing. This action of the Government brought the ‘police wing' under the administrative and financial
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »