Advanced Search Results
Radhika Agarwal versus Union of India and Others
Supreme Court of India
Feb-27-2025
Right to Information
[2025]2S.C.R.1331
Customs Act, 1962 and the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (GST Act).Headnotes† Customs Act, 1962 - Finance Act, 2012 - Finance Act, 2013 - Finance Act, 2019 - ss.104(4), 104(6) - Central Goods and Services Tax … (d) fraudulently obtaining an instrument for the purposes of this Act or the Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992 (22 of 1992), and such instrument is utilised under this Act, where duty relatable to such utilisation of … and Cosmetics Act, 1940; Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002.List of Keywords Section 104(4), 104(6) of Customs Act, 1962; Finance Act, 2012; Finance Act, 2019; … 644, 647, 663, 648, 660 And 655 of 2023, T.P. (Crl.) No. 1016 of 2023, W.P. (Crl.) No. 5, 3, 29, 6, 13, 20, 18
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJt. Cit Vs. Groz Backert Asia Ltd.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Chandigarh
Aug-28-2002
Direct Taxation
(2003)86ITD291(Chd.)
of deduction provided by sub-section (3) for several years was not considered sufficient and through amendment made by Finance Act, 1992, it has been thought proper by legislature to increase the amount of deduction by 90 per cent of … Rules. The Hon'ble Allahabad High Court in the case of Modi Spinning & Weaving Industry v. ITO (1975) 101 ITR 637 (All) has held that at any particular stage of the assessment proceedings the assessee would be
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskWallfort Shares and Stock Brokers Vs. Income-tax Officer [Alongwith
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai
Jul-15-2005
Land Acquisition
of Section 14-A by the Finance Act, 2001 with retrospective effect from 1.4.1962; Explanation to Section 36(1)(viii) by Finance Act, 1992 with retrospective effect from 1.4.1987 and so on. If intention of the legislature was to give retrospective effect … 129 ITR 295 (SC); of Supreme Court again in the case of Sole Trustee Lokashikshana Trust v. CIT, 101 ITR 234 (SC) and of Bombay High Court in the case of Provident Investment Co. Ltd. v. CIT,
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Wallfort Shares and Stock Brokers Vs. Ito
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai
Jul-15-2005
Land Acquisition
(2005)96ITD1(Mum.)
of section 14-A by the Finance Act, 2001 with retrospective effect from 1-4-1962; Explanation to section 36(1)(viii) by Finance Act, 1992 with retrospective effect from 1-4-1987 and so on. If intention of the legislature was to give retrospective effect … 129 ITR 295 (SC); of Supreme Court again in the case of Sole Trustee Lokashikshana Trust v. CIT, 101 ITR 234 (SC) and of Bombay High Court in the case of Provident Investment Co. Ltd. v. CIT,
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskP. Murugan Vs. The Registrar, Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal and Ot ...
Chennai
Jan-03-2017
Land Acquisition
considered in the light of the general purpose of the Act itself". 101. In RBI v. Peerless General Finance and Investment Co. Ltd., [(1987) 1 SCC 424], it was observed, "that interpretation is best which makes the … to the decision of the Hon'ble Apex Court in Nelson Motis v. Union of India reported in AIR 1992 SC 1981. (xxiv) In M/s.Oswal Agro Mills Ltd., v. Collector of Central Excise and others reported in 1993 … present writ petition has been filed. 9. Referring to second proviso to Section 18 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002, Mr.A.V.Arun, learned counsel appearing for the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIn Re: G.V. Films Ltd.
Chennai
Dec-04-2008
Company
Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 1, 2, 2(12), 3, 9, 2(12), 75, 78, 78(1), 78(2), 94 to 97, 100 to 105, 217(1), 235 to 251, 390 to 394 and 643; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 21; Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 - Rules 47 and 85; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 38, Rule 5
[2009]150CompCas415(Mad)
has it prohibited any method of effecting that object-per Lord Herschell L.C. in British and American Trustee and Finance Corporation v. Couper [1894] AC 397 (HL), at page 405, quoted with approval by Lord Reid in Westburn … shares in exchange in the resulting companies, the demerged company has to comply with the statutory requirement under Section 101(2)(b) of the Act. In this, he placed reliance on the decision of the Chancery Division reported in [1957]
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAssistant Commissioner of Vs. Smt. Chandri N. Shah
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Nagpur
Nov-30-1998
Direct Taxation
(1999)71ITD231(Nag.)
of the firm shall not form part of total income of the partners. As per section 2(9)(J) of Finance Act 1992, the net agricultural income of a person was to be computed in accordance with the Rules contained in … the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of CIT v. TV Sundaram Iyengar & Sons (P.) Ltd. (1975) 101 ITR 764 wherein it has been held that if' the language of the statute is clear and unambiguous,
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRashima Verma Vs. Securities and Exchange Board of India
Delhi
Jan-23-2009
Company
Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992 - Sections 11B, 12(1B), 24, 24(1) and 27; Companies Act; Negotiable Instruments Act - Sections 141(1) and 141(2); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 204 and 482; Securities and Exchange Board of India (Collective Investment Schemes) Regulations, 1999 - Regulations 5(1), 68(1), 68(2), 73, 73(1) and 74
[2009]95SCL1(Delhi)
DLT 361d. Anoop Jhalani v. State and Anr. 144 (2007) DLT 858e. P.S. Srinivasan and Ors. v. VLS Finance Ltd. Crl. M.C. 7423-25/2006 7423-25/2006 , 7430-32/2006 7430-32/2006 , 735-37/2006, 7458-60/2006 7458-60/2006 (Unreported dated 28.3.2008)8. Learned Counsel for … the company, in view of the violation under Section 27 of the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992 (hereinafter referred to as 'SEBI Act') by the learned Additional Sessions Judge. M/s. Divyabhoomi Agro (I) Ltd. (hereinafter
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRama Steel Industries and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.
Mumbai
Sep-07-2007
Banking
Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 - Sections 91 and 101; Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act (SARFAESI), 2002 - Sections 2, 2(1), 5, 9, 13, 13(2), 17, 17(2), 19, 34, 35, 37, 41, 42 and 75; Banking Regulation Act, 1949 - Sections 5 and 56; Recovery of Debts due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 - Sections 2 and 34(2); Companies Act, 1956; Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1956; Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992; Industrial Finance Corporation Act, 1948; State Financial Corporations Act, 1951; Unit Trust of India. Act, 1963; Industrial Reconstruction Bank of India Act, 1984; Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985; Small Industries Development Bank of India Act, 1989; Cons
AIR2008Bom38; 2007(6)ALLMR739; 2008(1)BomCR271; 2007(6)MhLj387
shall be in addition to, and not in derogation of, the Industrial Finance Corporation Act, 1948, the State Financial Corporations Act, 1951, the Unit Trust … of 1956), the Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1956 (42 of 1956), the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992 (15 of 1992), the Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 (51 of 1993) … No. 2-Bank. The petitioners had mortgaged immovable properties to respondent No. 2-Bank. Respondent No. 2 started proceedings under Section 101 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 for recovery of Rs. 47,69,648/-. On 14-7-2003, during the pendency of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDelhi Race Club (1940) Ltd. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi
Dec-26-2006
Direct Taxation
(2007)108TTJ(Delhi)297
from each winning from horse race, claimed by assessee. However as per the amendment brought in by the Finance Act, 1992 w.e.f. 1st April, 1992, the amount of exemption was revised from Rs. 5,000 to Rs. 2,500. The claim … (1989) 178 ITR 62 (St) No. 621, dt. 19th Dec, 1991 (1992) 101 CTR (St) 1 and No. 240 dt. 17th May, 1978.6. On the … the CIT(A) dt. 9th June, 2003 for the asst. yr. 2001-02, in the matter of order passed under Section 201 and Section 201(1A) of the IT Act, 1961, wherein following two grounds have been raised by the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »