Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: finance act 1992 chapter i · Page 1 of about 1,793 results (0.073 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Mar 19 1996

Krishna Kumar Mishra and anr. Etc. Etc. Vs. State of Bihar and ors. Et ...

Court : Patna

Decided on : Mar-19-1996

Subject : ElectionConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 243D, 243D(1), 243D(2), 243D(3), 243D(4), 243D(5), 243D(6) and 243D(7); Bihar Panchayat Raj Act, 1993 - Sections 13(1), 15(7), 36(1), 38(2), 63(1), 65(2) and 88

Court in Indra Sawhney v. Union of India, AIR 1993 SC 477.Immediately thereafter, by the Constitution's (73rd Amendment) Act, 1992, a new principle of reservation has been laid down under Article 243D of Constitution of India, in the … sign the warrant addressed to the Superintendent of Jail to imprison him. There is also no provision for financing a Gram Katchahry, i.e. to meet its administrative expenses. Perhaps, the Ranches will also not be entitled to … to formation of Gram Kutchery (Village Court) which has been included under Chapter-VI of Panchayat Act, 1993, is also under challenge in C.W.J.C. 6853/95. In

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 24 1992

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Kerala Financial Corporation Ltd.

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Aug-24-1992

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 36(1)

Reported in : [1993]202ITR186(Ker)

v. CIT [1988] 174 ITR 206 besides with reference to the Statement of Objects and Reasons to the Finance Act, 1985. So far as the first ground is concerned, viz., that the decision of the Cambay Electric Supply … the deduction is to be 40% of the total income before making any deduction under Section 36(1)(viii) and Chapter VI-A. The inference attempted to be drawn is that the law was otherwise till April 1, 1985, when

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 10 2010

State of Rajasthan Vs. Uka and ors.,

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : May-10-2010

Subject : Tenancy

overcome the above difficulties, it was felt necessary to amend the Act.13. Chapter II of the Act of 1974 prescribes rights of agriculturists to alienate … shown that there are certain provisions therein which inhibit the entry of commercial Banks into the field of financing of agriculture. It will, therefore, be necessary to modify these laws for the purpose of enabling commercial banks … issue under consideration, it may be useful to notice certain relevant statutes and the facts associated.THE RAJASTHAN TENANCY ACT, 19553. On 30.3.1949, the State of Rajasthan was formed on integration of several independent Princely States and Chief-ships

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Oct 29 2002

Mr. Bhupendra Kumar Bhaumik Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Oct-29-2002

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 226 and 246; Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 45, 54E, 54E(1), 54E(1C), 269SS and 276DD ; Finance Act, 1992; Central Excise and Salt Act, 1944

Reported in : (2003)179CTR(Del)530

1C of Section 54E of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short the Act), as introduced by the Finance Act, 1992, praying that the words and figures '29th day of February, 1992' in the said Section be struck down … application in the facts of the present case.13. The scope and effect of amendment in various sections in Chapter IV Part E of the Act relating to taxation of capital gains including the amendments of Section 45

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 30 2015

M/s. Sevantilal and Sons and Another Vs. The Union of India and Others

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jan-30-2015

Subject : Service Tax

the above condition or stipulation and in consonance with that the Government of India, in the Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue) made the amendments in the Customs Notification on 18th April, 2013. That the Customs Notification … no provision either under section 25 of the Customs Act, 1962 or the Foreign Trade (Development and Regulations) Act, 1992 to amend retrospectively the exemption notification or the Foreign Trade Policy respectively. It is now well settled position … transferability on or after 18th April, 2013 by the Regional Authority. 6. Chapter 4 of the Foreign Trade Policy and Handbook of Procedures, 2009-14 (17th

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 20 2005

Shri M.U. Joshi Vs. the Tax Recovery Officer,

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-20-2005

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 143(3) and 245I; Finance Act, 1992; Income Tax Rules - Rules 57, 58, 63(1), 68B, 68B(1) and 68B(2)

Reported in : 2005(6)BomCR17; (2005)199CTR(Bom)249; [2006]281ITR289(Bom); 2006(1)MhLj95

liable to be vacated. 10. Rule 68B was introduced in the Second Schedule to the I.T. Act by Finance Act, 1992 specifically with a view to prescribe time limit of three years for sale of attached immovable properties. Proviso … the provisions of section 245-I or, as the case may be, final in terms of the provisions of Chapter XX. Provided that where the immovable property is required to be re-sold due to the amount of highest

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 02 2002

income-tax Officer Vs. Kuldeep Jain

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

Decided on : Jan-02-2002

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2002)81ITD379(Delhi)

which our attention was invited and the rival submissions. Under the provisions of Section 64(1A), inserted by the Finance Act, 1992 w.e.f. 1-4-1993, as they stood at the relevant point of time, in computing the total income of an … income means total income, computed in accordance with the provisions of the Act, without making any deduction under chapter VIA of the Income-tax Act.2. Facts of the case, to be stated succinctly, are thus. The assessee, an

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 26 1994

Tata Cellular Vs. Union of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jul-26-1994

Subject : ContractConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 136 and 226; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 482; R.S.C. - Order 59, Rule 3(2)

Reported in : AIR1996SC11; [1994]Supp2SCR122

one of the parameter is the experience of foreign operating partner. In the case of Bharti Cellular, SFR Finance Company has no experience. Talkland's sole function is service. Therefore, its experience should not have been added. In … Telecommunication Limited3. Mobile Telecom Services4. Indian Telecom Limited6. Between 19th of May, 1992 and 27 of May, 1992 the recommendations were submitted to the Telecom … not be enclosed with the offer, the offer shall not be considered. Equally, in relation to financial bid, Chapter I states that any offer received after the due date and time shall be rejected, the various other clauses … exercise all powers of Telecom Authority under Section 3 of the Telegraph Act. The Minister approved the issue of financial bids with modification to the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 27 1999

Mitsui and Company Ltd. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-27-1999

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (1999)65TTJ(Del)1

Explanationn in section 9(ii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, with effect from 1st April, 1979 by the Finance Act, 1983, it is clarified and declared that the income which falls under the head 'salaries' payable for services … tax or any part of the tax as required to be deducted by or under the provisions of Chapter XVII-B, the liability to penalty arises unless such failure is proved to be for a reasonable cause as

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 14 2000

Sadanand S. Varde and ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jun-14-2000

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income-tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2(1B), 45, 47, 269UA, 269UC, 269UC(1), 269UD, 269UE(1), 269UE(6), 269UL and 276AB; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 75(1), 391 to 394 and 394A; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 32, 48A and 226; Maharashtra Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Act, 1960 - Sections 4(3); Environment (Protection) Act, 1986; Maharashtra Regional Town Planning Act, 1971; Maharashtra Regional Town Planning Act, 1966 - Sections 37, 37(1) and 47; Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 - Sections 20 and 30; Development Control Rules - Rules 10(2) and 39; Violation of Coastal Regulation Zone (CRZ) Rules; Development Control Regulations - Regulation 11(4); Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 54; Sale of Goods Act - Sections 2(10); Banking Companies (Acquisition

Reported in : 2000(4)ALLMR510; 2001(1)BomCR261; [2001]247ITR609(Bom)

fifth respondent that, even while this writ petition was pending before this court, the petitioners had moved the Finance Minister, Government of India, requesting him to look into the matter of transfer of the concerned plot at … the present writ petition urges the question as to the applicability of Chapter XX-C of the Income-tax Act, 1961, in a so-called public interest litigation … of the Council. He is also an ex-Minister of the Government of Maharashtra. The second petitioner was an active member of the Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay for a number of years and is active in the … accepted and incorporated in the final sanctioned development plan on May 7, 1992.21. By an application dated February 17, 1979, the sixth respondent (Enjay Estates

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial