Advanced Search Results
Coromandel Fertilisers Limited Vs. Dy. Commissioner of Income-tax
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Hyderabad
Nov-10-2003
Direct Taxation
(2004)90ITD344(Hyd.)
by the Courts over the years, has found statutory recognition in Section 2(42C), which was inserted by the Finance Act, 1999 with effect from 1.4.2000. He also invited our attention to Section 50B providing for computation of capital … 50 of the Act. He noticed that the assessee had executed a separate sale deed dated 20th November, 1990 for the transfer of land of more than 2,000 acres for a consideration of Rs. 2,87,00,000. He also … of 1949. Therefore, the Supreme Court in CIT v. Ajax Products Ltd. 55 ITR 741 held that the amendment made in 1949 only removed one
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Askitc Ltd. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Kolkata
Mar-25-2003
Direct Taxation
(2003)86ITD135(Kol.)
was issued by the CBDT to explain the substance of the provisions relating to direct taxes in the Finance Act, 1986. The learned authorised representative is also silent about the observation of the AO that this type of … valuation of land sold to TCS/ITC Classic with all supportings in terms of valuation reports of 1983 and 1990. Kindly note that for the purpose of splitting the sale consideration between land and building, the latest valuation … to plug this loophole by the insertion of Sub-clause (ii) to Section 55(2)(aa) of the Act by the Finance Act, 1994 which provides that the … the AO in rejecting the appellant's claim for being allowed deduction under Section 36(1)(iii) of IT Act, 1961, while computing the income chargeable under the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskParshuram D. Patil Vs. Assistant Commissioner of
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai
Sep-19-2005
Direct Taxation
(2006)102ITD241(Mum.)
that the gains earned by the assessees are taxable as per the amendment of Section 55(2) by the Finance Act, 1994 with effect from 1-4-1995. As the assessee acquired the plot prior to 1974 and transferred the same
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Parshuram D. Patil Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai
Jan-25-2006
Direct Taxation
(2006)103TTJ(Mum.)765
that the gains earned by the assessees are taxable as per the amendment of Section 55(2) by the Finance Act, 1994 w.e.f. 1st April, 1995. As the assessee acquired the plot prior to 1974 and transferred the same … 4 bearing survey No. 165 (Pt) was purchased on 22nd Feb., 1982 and was sold from 21st Dec, 1990 onwards after dividing it into 31 small plots. The plot at serial No. 5 bearing survey No. 114/5
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskTarajan Tea Co. Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax
Guwahati
Jul-07-1993
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 144B and 263
not attracted. It is true that the effect of this decision regarding 'goodwill' has been overcome by the Finance Act, 1987, amending Section 55 so as to provide that cost of acquisition of goodwill acquired other than by
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskB. Raghurama Prabhu Estate, Executrix Smt. M. Kaveri Bai and ors. Vs. ...
Karnataka
Dec-19-2002
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 4, 45(1) and 55(2); Indian Partnership Act, 1932 - Sections 14 and 47
(2003)180CTR(Kar)87; [2003]264ITR124(KAR); [2003]264ITR124(Karn)
from capital gains', 43. In order to overcome the above judicial interpretation of the apex Court, by the Finance Act, 1987, which came into force w.e.f. 1st April, 1988, Section 55(2)(a) of the Act was amended providing that … under the supervision and direction of this Court. This fact becomes evident from the order dt. 11th April, 1990, passed by the Division Bench of this Court in O.S.A. No. 2/1989 wherein it was inter alia held
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Income Tax, Mumbai Vs. D.P. Sandu Bros. Chembur (P) Lt ...
Supreme Court of India
Jan-31-2005
Direct Taxation Tenancy
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2(24), 10(3), 14, 45, 48, 55(2) and 56; Finance Act, 1994; Income Tax Act, 1922
AIR2005SC796; 2005(5)ALLMR(SC)545; [2005]273ITR1(SC); JT2005(2)SC226; (2005)2SCC584
situation created by the decision in Srinivasa Setty and the subsequent decisions of the High Court that the Finance Act 1994 amended Section 55(2) to provide that the cost of acquisition of inter-alia a tenancy right would be
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJ. Sainsbury Plc. Vs. Oconnar (inspector of Taxes).
Kolkata
May-22-1991
Direct Taxation
[1992]197ITR462(Cal)
It is first found in a taxng statute, so far as I have been able to ascertain, in section 55 of the Finance Act, 1927, where it appears in connection with relief from stamp duty on transfers. But … relief, the option agreement was an 'arrangement' within the meaning of paragraph 5(3) of Schedule 12 to the Finance Act, 1973. If so, the taxpayer company would lose the benefit of group relief by virtue of section 28
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, vs Smt.Gracy Babu,
Kerala
Apr-03-2024
decision in B.C. Srinivasa Shetty (128 ITR 294) (SC) and thesubsequent decisions of the High Court that the Finance Act, 1994, amended section 55(2) to provide that the cost of acquisition of, inter alia, a tenancy right. would
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, vs Gracy Babu,
Kerala
Apr-03-2024
decision in B.C. Srinivasa Shetty (128 ITR 294) (SC) and thesubsequent decisions of the High Court that the Finance Act, 1994, amended section 55(2) to provide that the cost of acquisition of, inter alia, a tenancy right. would
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »