Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: finance act 1990 section 29 · Page 1 of about 3,195 results (0.121 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jan 24 2006

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Sharda Gum and Chemicals

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Jan-24-2006

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2007)209CTR(Raj)143; [2007]288ITR116(Raj)

made with retrospective effect from April 1, 1962, April 1, 1967, and April 1, 1972, respectively vide the Finance Act, 1990. Perhaps this necessitated the filing of a revised return by the assessee on May 1, 1990, of total … as under:Whether, on the facts and circumstances of the case, the Tribunal has correctly construed the provisions of Section 80HHC, in the matter of computing profits and gains of their business, in the context of the said

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 17 2016

KSB Aktiengesellschaft and Another Vs. Anil Agarwal

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jun-17-2016

Subject : Land Acquisition

internationally well-known trade mark with a presence in India (KSB Aktiengesellschaft and Anr. v KSB Real Estate and Finance Private Limited; Notice of Motion No.4019 of 2007 in Suit No.2930 of 2007; decided on 11th February 2008). … is or must be deemed to be an unregistered proprietor or user at least for the purposes of Section 29(4) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 using dissimilar goods and, therefore, liable to suffer an injunction. If, on

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 14 2004

Shree Jagannath Packers and ors. Vs. State of Orissa and ors.

Court : Orissa

Decided on : Sep-14-2004

Subject : CivilSales Tax

Acts : Orissa Sales Tax Act, 1947 - Sections 6, 7 and 12; Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 - Sections 8(5) and 13(3); State Financial Corporation Act, 1951 - Sections 29; Orissa General Clauses Act, 1937 - Sections 22; Punjab General Clauses Act, 1898 - Sections 19; Bihar Finance Act - Sections 7; Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 25 and 25(1); Electricity Supply Act - Sections 49; Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, 1954 - Sections 4(2); East Punjab Public Safety Act - Sections 20 and 36(1); General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 21; Central Sales Tax (Deferment of Payment of Taxes) Orissa Rules, 1990; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 154(1), 154(2), 161, 162 and 166(3)

Reported in : [2005]141STC26(Orissa)

that a notification issued by the State Government in exercise of powers under Section 7 of the Bihar Finance Act to the extent it is repugnant to the Industrial Policy Resolution of the Government of Bihar is bad. … production to new small-scale industries. Accordingly, Notification No. 27662-CTA-560/90-F dated August 16, 1990 was issued under Section 6 of the Orissa Sales Tax Act, 1947 … the assets of M/s. Suki Industries Pvt. Ltd. at Allipur Road, Narayanpur taken over by the O.S.F.C. under Section 29 of the State Financial Corporation Act, 1951 and paid a price of Rs. 23.50 lakhs to the O.S.F.C.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Oct 28 2020

K.M.Suprabha,Principal vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Oct-28-2020

appeals W.A.NO.1990 OF 2007 & con.cases. 15 in order to identify as to whether the institutions are substantially financed by the State Government or not since there was no evidence available before the court. It is accordingly … the appellants are not entitled to get any relief being a public authority under the Right to information Act 2005 and liable to provide information in terms of the provisions of the Act, 2005.2. The common judgement … this Court and before the ApexCourt. However, the Apex Court found that section 2(h) of the Right to Information Act, 2005 deals with six different … After holding so it was held as follows in paragraph 27 to 29,:27.Whether an NGO or body is substantially financed by the Government is a

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 28 2020

Dr.G.Mohan Sreekumar,Principal vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Oct-28-2020

appeals W.A.NO.1990 OF 2007 & con.cases. 15 in order to identify as to whether the institutions are substantially financed by the State Government or not since there was no evidence available before the court. It is accordingly … the appellants are not entitled to get any relief being a public authority under the Right to information Act 2005 and liable to provide information in terms of the provisions of the Act, 2005.2. The common judgement … this Court and before the ApexCourt. However, the Apex Court found that section 2(h) of the Right to Information Act, 2005 deals with six different … After holding so it was held as follows in paragraph 27 to 29,:27.Whether an NGO or body is substantially financed by the Government is a

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 28 2020

Dr.Jeevan Lal,Principal vs State of Kerala & Others

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Oct-28-2020

appeals W.A.NO.1990 OF 2007 & con.cases. 15 in order to identify as to whether the institutions are substantially financed by the State Government or not since there was no evidence available before the court. It is accordingly … the appellants are not entitled to get any relief being a public authority under the Right to information Act 2005 and liable to provide information in terms of the provisions of the Act, 2005.2. The common judgement … this Court and before the ApexCourt. However, the Apex Court found that section 2(h) of the Right to Information Act, 2005 deals with six different … After holding so it was held as follows in paragraph 27 to 29,:27.Whether an NGO or body is substantially financed by the Government is a

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 28 2020

Dr. N.Viswarajan, Principal vs State of Kerala & Others

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Oct-28-2020

appeals W.A.NO.1990 OF 2007 & con.cases. 15 in order to identify as to whether the institutions are substantially financed by the State Government or not since there was no evidence available before the court. It is accordingly … the appellants are not entitled to get any relief being a public authority under the Right to information Act 2005 and liable to provide information in terms of the provisions of the Act, 2005.2. The common judgement … this Court and before the ApexCourt. However, the Apex Court found that section 2(h) of the Right to Information Act, 2005 deals with six different … After holding so it was held as follows in paragraph 27 to 29,:27.Whether an NGO or body is substantially financed by the Government is a

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 28 2020

Dr.S.V.Sudheer,Principal vs State of Kerala & Others

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Oct-28-2020

appeals W.A.NO.1990 OF 2007 & con.cases. 15 in order to identify as to whether the institutions are substantially financed by the State Government or not since there was no evidence available before the court. It is accordingly … the appellants are not entitled to get any relief being a public authority under the Right to information Act 2005 and liable to provide information in terms of the provisions of the Act, 2005.2. The common judgement … this Court and before the ApexCourt. However, the Apex Court found that section 2(h) of the Right to Information Act, 2005 deals with six different … After holding so it was held as follows in paragraph 27 to 29,:27.Whether an NGO or body is substantially financed by the Government is a

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 28 2020

Dr. Suma Narayan, Principal vs State of Kerala & Others

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Oct-28-2020

appeals W.A.NO.1990 OF 2007 & con.cases. 15 in order to identify as to whether the institutions are substantially financed by the State Government or not since there was no evidence available before the court. It is accordingly … the appellants are not entitled to get any relief being a public authority under the Right to information Act 2005 and liable to provide information in terms of the provisions of the Act, 2005.2. The common judgement … this Court and before the ApexCourt. However, the Apex Court found that section 2(h) of the Right to Information Act, 2005 deals with six different … After holding so it was held as follows in paragraph 27 to 29,:27.Whether an NGO or body is substantially financed by the Government is a

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 28 2020

B.Vijaya Babu vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Oct-28-2020

appeals W.A.NO.1990 OF 2007 & con.cases. 15 in order to identify as to whether the institutions are substantially financed by the State Government or not since there was no evidence available before the court. It is accordingly … the appellants are not entitled to get any relief being a public authority under the Right to information Act 2005 and liable to provide information in terms of the provisions of the Act, 2005.2. The common judgement … this Court and before the ApexCourt. However, the Apex Court found that section 2(h) of the Right to Information Act, 2005 deals with six different … After holding so it was held as follows in paragraph 27 to 29,:27.Whether an NGO or body is substantially financed by the Government is a

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial