Advanced Search Results
Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Sharda Gum and Chemicals
Rajasthan
Jan-24-2006
Direct Taxation
(2007)209CTR(Raj)143; [2007]288ITR116(Raj)
made with retrospective effect from April 1, 1962, April 1, 1967, and April 1, 1972, respectively vide the Finance Act, 1990. Perhaps this necessitated the filing of a revised return by the assessee on May 1, 1990, of total … as under:Whether, on the facts and circumstances of the case, the Tribunal has correctly construed the provisions of Section 80HHC, in the matter of computing profits and gains of their business, in the context of the said
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKSB Aktiengesellschaft and Another Vs. Anil Agarwal
Mumbai
Jun-17-2016
Land Acquisition
internationally well-known trade mark with a presence in India (KSB Aktiengesellschaft and Anr. v KSB Real Estate and Finance Private Limited; Notice of Motion No.4019 of 2007 in Suit No.2930 of 2007; decided on 11th February 2008). … is or must be deemed to be an unregistered proprietor or user at least for the purposes of Section 29(4) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 using dissimilar goods and, therefore, liable to suffer an injunction. If, on
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShree Jagannath Packers and ors. Vs. State of Orissa and ors.
Orissa
Sep-14-2004
CivilSales Tax
Orissa Sales Tax Act, 1947 - Sections 6, 7 and 12; Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 - Sections 8(5) and 13(3); State Financial Corporation Act, 1951 - Sections 29; Orissa General Clauses Act, 1937 - Sections 22; Punjab General Clauses Act, 1898 - Sections 19; Bihar Finance Act - Sections 7; Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 25 and 25(1); Electricity Supply Act - Sections 49; Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, 1954 - Sections 4(2); East Punjab Public Safety Act - Sections 20 and 36(1); General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 21; Central Sales Tax (Deferment of Payment of Taxes) Orissa Rules, 1990; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 154(1), 154(2), 161, 162 and 166(3)
[2005]141STC26(Orissa)
that a notification issued by the State Government in exercise of powers under Section 7 of the Bihar Finance Act to the extent it is repugnant to the Industrial Policy Resolution of the Government of Bihar is bad. … production to new small-scale industries. Accordingly, Notification No. 27662-CTA-560/90-F dated August 16, 1990 was issued under Section 6 of the Orissa Sales Tax Act, 1947 … the assets of M/s. Suki Industries Pvt. Ltd. at Allipur Road, Narayanpur taken over by the O.S.F.C. under Section 29 of the State Financial Corporation Act, 1951 and paid a price of Rs. 23.50 lakhs to the O.S.F.C.
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
K.M.Suprabha,Principal vs State of Kerala
Kerala
Oct-28-2020
appeals W.A.NO.1990 OF 2007 & con.cases. 15 in order to identify as to whether the institutions are substantially financed by the State Government or not since there was no evidence available before the court. It is accordingly … the appellants are not entitled to get any relief being a public authority under the Right to information Act 2005 and liable to provide information in terms of the provisions of the Act, 2005.2. The common judgement … this Court and before the ApexCourt. However, the Apex Court found that section 2(h) of the Right to Information Act, 2005 deals with six different … After holding so it was held as follows in paragraph 27 to 29,:27.Whether an NGO or body is substantially financed by the Government is a
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDr.G.Mohan Sreekumar,Principal vs State of Kerala
Kerala
Oct-28-2020
appeals W.A.NO.1990 OF 2007 & con.cases. 15 in order to identify as to whether the institutions are substantially financed by the State Government or not since there was no evidence available before the court. It is accordingly … the appellants are not entitled to get any relief being a public authority under the Right to information Act 2005 and liable to provide information in terms of the provisions of the Act, 2005.2. The common judgement … this Court and before the ApexCourt. However, the Apex Court found that section 2(h) of the Right to Information Act, 2005 deals with six different … After holding so it was held as follows in paragraph 27 to 29,:27.Whether an NGO or body is substantially financed by the Government is a
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDr.Jeevan Lal,Principal vs State of Kerala & Others
Kerala
Oct-28-2020
appeals W.A.NO.1990 OF 2007 & con.cases. 15 in order to identify as to whether the institutions are substantially financed by the State Government or not since there was no evidence available before the court. It is accordingly … the appellants are not entitled to get any relief being a public authority under the Right to information Act 2005 and liable to provide information in terms of the provisions of the Act, 2005.2. The common judgement … this Court and before the ApexCourt. However, the Apex Court found that section 2(h) of the Right to Information Act, 2005 deals with six different … After holding so it was held as follows in paragraph 27 to 29,:27.Whether an NGO or body is substantially financed by the Government is a
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDr. N.Viswarajan, Principal vs State of Kerala & Others
Kerala
Oct-28-2020
appeals W.A.NO.1990 OF 2007 & con.cases. 15 in order to identify as to whether the institutions are substantially financed by the State Government or not since there was no evidence available before the court. It is accordingly … the appellants are not entitled to get any relief being a public authority under the Right to information Act 2005 and liable to provide information in terms of the provisions of the Act, 2005.2. The common judgement … this Court and before the ApexCourt. However, the Apex Court found that section 2(h) of the Right to Information Act, 2005 deals with six different … After holding so it was held as follows in paragraph 27 to 29,:27.Whether an NGO or body is substantially financed by the Government is a
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDr.S.V.Sudheer,Principal vs State of Kerala & Others
Kerala
Oct-28-2020
appeals W.A.NO.1990 OF 2007 & con.cases. 15 in order to identify as to whether the institutions are substantially financed by the State Government or not since there was no evidence available before the court. It is accordingly … the appellants are not entitled to get any relief being a public authority under the Right to information Act 2005 and liable to provide information in terms of the provisions of the Act, 2005.2. The common judgement … this Court and before the ApexCourt. However, the Apex Court found that section 2(h) of the Right to Information Act, 2005 deals with six different … After holding so it was held as follows in paragraph 27 to 29,:27.Whether an NGO or body is substantially financed by the Government is a
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDr. Suma Narayan, Principal vs State of Kerala & Others
Kerala
Oct-28-2020
appeals W.A.NO.1990 OF 2007 & con.cases. 15 in order to identify as to whether the institutions are substantially financed by the State Government or not since there was no evidence available before the court. It is accordingly … the appellants are not entitled to get any relief being a public authority under the Right to information Act 2005 and liable to provide information in terms of the provisions of the Act, 2005.2. The common judgement … this Court and before the ApexCourt. However, the Apex Court found that section 2(h) of the Right to Information Act, 2005 deals with six different … After holding so it was held as follows in paragraph 27 to 29,:27.Whether an NGO or body is substantially financed by the Government is a
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskB.Vijaya Babu vs State of Kerala
Kerala
Oct-28-2020
appeals W.A.NO.1990 OF 2007 & con.cases. 15 in order to identify as to whether the institutions are substantially financed by the State Government or not since there was no evidence available before the court. It is accordingly … the appellants are not entitled to get any relief being a public authority under the Right to information Act 2005 and liable to provide information in terms of the provisions of the Act, 2005.2. The common judgement … this Court and before the ApexCourt. However, the Apex Court found that section 2(h) of the Right to Information Act, 2005 deals with six different … After holding so it was held as follows in paragraph 27 to 29,:27.Whether an NGO or body is substantially financed by the Government is a
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »