Advanced Search Results
Shree Jagannath Packers and ors. Vs. State of Orissa and ors.
Orissa
Sep-14-2004
CivilSales Tax
Orissa Sales Tax Act, 1947 - Sections 6, 7 and 12; Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 - Sections 8(5) and 13(3); State Financial Corporation Act, 1951 - Sections 29; Orissa General Clauses Act, 1937 - Sections 22; Punjab General Clauses Act, 1898 - Sections 19; Bihar Finance Act - Sections 7; Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 25 and 25(1); Electricity Supply Act - Sections 49; Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, 1954 - Sections 4(2); East Punjab Public Safety Act - Sections 20 and 36(1); General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 21; Central Sales Tax (Deferment of Payment of Taxes) Orissa Rules, 1990; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 154(1), 154(2), 161, 162 and 166(3)
[2005]141STC26(Orissa)
that a notification issued by the State Government in exercise of powers under Section 7 of the Bihar Finance Act to the extent it is repugnant to the Industrial Policy Resolution of the Government of Bihar is bad. … individual cases as stated in the writ petitions:2. O.J.C. No. 9967 of 1999 (Petitioner--Shree Jagannath Packers) :By IPR, 1989 the Government of Orissa declared, inter alia, that exemption will be allowed to new small-scale industrial units set
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCrown Re-roller (P) Ltd. Vs. State of Orissa in the Department of Fina ...
Orissa
Nov-21-2003
Sales Tax
Orissa Sales Tax Act, 1947 - Sections 14; Orissa Sales Tax Rules, 1947 - Rule 39;
2004(I)OLR107; [2005]139STC305(Orissa)
to the second question, namely the issuance of notification by the State Government in exercise of power under Section 7 of the Bihar Finance Act, it is true that issuance of such notifications entitled the industrial units to … for decision is whether the State Government wh.ile exercising the power of issuing a notification under the Bihar Finance Act could deny benefits declared by the State Government under its Industrial Incentive Policy and the Supreme Court held … petitioner filed a writ petition before this Court O.J.C. No. 1712 of 1989 and by judgment dated 8th of May, 1990, a Division Bench of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskEast India Hotels Ltd. and anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.
Rajasthan
Mar-12-2001
Direct Taxation
Rajasthan Land and Buildings Tax Act, 1964 - Sections 2(10), 3, 3(1B), 6, 10, 10A, 11, 11(1), 13, 13(1), 13(1B), 14, 15, 15B, 16A(1), 16(1), 21, 22 and 22A; Rajasthan Urban Land Tax (Amendment) Act, 1973 - Sections 4, 7, 7(2), 7(3) and 8 to 12; Rajasthan Lands and Buildings Tax (Amendment) Act, 1995; Rajasthan Ordinance, 1988; Wealth-tax Act, 1957; Motor Vehicles Taxation Act; Finance Act, 1989 - Sections 3(1B); Companies Act; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 141, 245 and 265
AIR2001Raj286; [2001]250ITR789(Raj); 2001(4)WLN217
in the matter of the one-time tax scheme introduced by way of insertion of Section 5(1B) of the Finance Act, 1989 (Act No. 6 of 1989).2. The questions for our consideration are :'(1) Whether, fresh assessment is permissible under … and buildings in any urban area, and shall pay tax according to the provisions of Sub-section (2) of Section 7 as if that section applied to him as it applies to an owner liable to pay tax on
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
South Indian Bank Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax
Kerala
Nov-11-2002
Direct Taxation
Finance Act, 1985; Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 36, 36(1) and 36(2)
(2003)183CTR(Ker)21; [2003]262ITR579(Ker)
36(1) and Clause (v) of Section 36(2) were inserted simultaneously with effect from April 1, 1985, by the Finance Act, 1985. Clause (viia) of Section 36(1) of the Act, it must be noted, was inserted by Act 21 … amendment to the main part of Clause (via) by Act 4 of 1988 with effect from April 1, 1989. Clause (vii) main part reads as follows :'Subject to the provisions of Sub-section (2), the amount of any … provision for bad and doubtful debts account made under that clause. ' 7. Section 36(1)(vii) of the Act as it stood prior to its amendment
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSouth Indian Bank Ltd. Vs. Cit
Kerala
Nov-11-2002
Direct Taxation
[2003]130TAXMAN749(Ker)
of section 36(1) and clause (v) of section 36(2) were inserted simultaneously with effect from 1-4-1985 by the Finance Act of 1985. Clause (viia) of section 36(1) of the Act, it must be noted, was inserted by Act
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPriyanka Overseas Ltd. Vs. Dy. Cit
Delhi
Dec-20-2000
Direct Taxation
[2001]79ITD353(Delhi)
Union of India (1992) 194 ITR 71 . Subsequently, the law was amended with retrospective effect by the Finance Act, 1990 and as such the receipts became taxable. Accordingly, the income was enhanced by the assessing officer and … and Aero Leather (P) Ltd. v. Union of India (1992) 194 ITR 71 . Subsequently, the law was amended with retrospective effect by the Finance … the order of Commissioner (Appeals) confirming the action of the assessing officer in regard to interest levied under sections 234B and 234C.2. Brief facts of the case are that assessed deposited tax of Rs. 53,40,334 arrived at
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJodhan Real Estate Development Vs. Assistant Commissioner of
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Jaipur
Jul-10-1995
Land Acquisition
(1996)56ITD90(JP.)
the revival of levy of wealth-tax in the case of closely held companies by Section 40 of the Finance Act, 1983, the assessee filed its return of wealth for the assessment year 1984-85 on 30-3-1985 declaring total wealth … said open market price could be decided either by the Assessing Officer or the Valuation Officer. Reference to Section 7(3) of the Wealth-tax Act, as regards the value determined by the D VO, has been specifically made in
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDeputy Commissioner of Vs. Oman International Bank Saog
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai
May-17-2006
Direct Taxation
(2006)100ITD285(Mum.)
debt had become bad before it was written off.15. At this stage, it may also be mentioned that Finance Act, 2001, has inserted the following Explanation after the proviso to Section 36(1)(vii): Explanation.--For the purposes of this clause, … U.P.Ltd. v. Dy. CITNewdeal Finance & Investment Ltd. v. Dy. CIT [2000] 74 ITD 469 (Chennai), Jayanti Commerce Ltd. v. Asstt. CIT [1997] 61 ITD … points even the post 1961 period.Therefore, the Direct Tax Laws (Amendment) Act, 1987 with effect from assessment year 1989-90 has further liberalized the requirement of writing off of debts by an assessee by altogether doing away with
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskN. Jayaprakash, Package India TIn Fabricators Vs. Cit
Kerala
Jan-20-2006
Direct Taxation
[2006]152TAXMAN432(Ker)
section 148 legal and valid in the light of the amended provision contained in section 148 as per Finance Act 2 of 19962. Whether on the facts and in the Circumstances of the case the Tribunal is justified … Held, Application under Order 9, Rule 4 C.P.C., is not maintainable. Reason being while exercising powers under Section 7(2)(a) and entertaining maintenance petition under Section 125 of Cr.P.C., Family Court cannot be deemed or treated as civil
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM/s. Bharti Airtel Ltd. Vs. The Commissioner of Central Excise
Mumbai
Aug-26-2014
Service Tax
amount of Rs.2,04,39,093/- under provisions of Rule 14 of the Credit Rules read with Section 73 of the Finance Act,1994. In respect of towers and parts thereof, prefabricated building, printers and office chairs, the Commissioner observed that the … v. Collector of Central Excise, Calcutta 1994 (74) ELT 22 59Collector of Central Excise v. Ambalal Sarabhai Enterprises, 1989 (43) ELT 214 60.Union Carbide India Ltd. v. Union of India and Ors. (1986) 2 SCC 547 61. … the provisions of Rule 14 of the Credit Rules, read with Section 73 of the Act; (ii) penalty should not be imposed under provisions of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »