Advanced Search Results

Bangalore Development Authority Vs. Syndicate Bank

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Consumer

Acts : Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - Sections 2 and 21

Reported in : AIR2007SC2198; 2008(3)BomCR808; (2007)3CompLJ58(SC); II(2007)CPJ17(SC); 2007(2)CTLJ52(SC); (2008)1GLR624(SC); 2007(5)KarLJ145; (2007)6MLJ975(SC); 2007(8)SCALE200; (2007)6SC

month. When BDA failed, the respondent filed a complaint before the Commission under Section 21 of Consumer Protection Act, 1986 ('Act' for short).Claim, defence and the decision7. The Respondent sought the following reliefs against BDA, in its complaint … O.P.No. 21 of 1995. The Facts2. The Banglore Development Authority (Appellant herein, 'BDA' for short) introduced a 'Self Financing Housing Scheme' for construction of flats/houses in Banglore in the year 1982. The said Scheme contemplated construction of

Shriram Transport Finance Co. Ltd. Represented by Its Senior Recovery ...

Court : National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC

Subject : Land Acquisition

delay, it has been simply mentioned that small period of delay can be condoned under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (for short, Act) by imposing cost. In support, learned counsel has relied upon certain judgments also. 8. State … Manager, D. NO. 40-1-100, B.H.R. Plaza, Benz Circle, Kanna Nagar, Vijayawada ?. 21. District Forum has also mentioned the same address in its order, dated … this common order. . 2. Facts in brief are that respondents/complainants purchased TATA Ace Autos which have been financed by the petitioners/OP, by hypothecating their vehicles. Petitioners seized the vehicle without any intimation. Accordingly, respondents filed complaint … for the exercise of discretion of jurisdiction vested in this Court under Section 15(a) of the Consumer Protection Act. The discretion conferred on this court

M/s. Bharti Airtel Ltd. Vs. The Commissioner of Central Excise

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Service Tax

amount of Rs.2,04,39,093/- under provisions of Rule 14 of the Credit Rules read with Section 73 of the Finance Act,1994. In respect of towers and parts thereof, prefabricated building, printers and office chairs, the Commissioner observed that the … inputs for manufacture of sanitary-ware. The assessee had claimed the benefit of exemption under a Notification no.217 of 1986. The revenue declined to grant benefit of exemption. The Tribunal had set aside the orders passed by the … capital goods which are further used in the factory of the manufacture; 21. A plain reading of the definition of ‘capital goods' as defined under

Heights Trade Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Uco Bank

Court : National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC

Subject : MRTP

a prolonged correspondence?. [See para 9 of the judgment]. 20. Opposite party has also cited Bank of India Finance Ltd. v. Custodian and Ors., III (1997) CLT 81 (SC)=(1997) 10 SCC 488 and para 2 of Topline … to seek exclusion of the time spent in prosecuting this complaint, before this Commission. Petition dismissed. Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - Section 2(1)(d), Section 21(a)(i); Cases referred: 1. Harsolia Motors v. National Insurance Co. Ltd., 2005 (1) CPJ

Shree Jagannath Packers and ors. Vs. State of Orissa and ors.

Court : Orissa

Subject : CivilSales Tax

Acts : Orissa Sales Tax Act, 1947 - Sections 6, 7 and 12; Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 - Sections 8(5) and 13(3); State Financial Corporation Act, 1951 - Sections 29; Orissa General Clauses Act, 1937 - Sections 22; Punjab General Clauses Act, 1898 - Sections 19; Bihar Finance Act - Sections 7; Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 25 and 25(1); Electricity Supply Act - Sections 49; Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, 1954 - Sections 4(2); East Punjab Public Safety Act - Sections 20 and 36(1); General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 21; Central Sales Tax (Deferment of Payment of Taxes) Orissa Rules, 1990; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 154(1), 154(2), 161, 162 and 166(3)

Reported in : [2005]141STC26(Orissa)

that a notification issued by the State Government in exercise of powers under Section 7 of the Bihar Finance Act to the extent it is repugnant to the Industrial Policy Resolution of the Government of Bihar is bad. … disposable syringe at Chandaka Industrial Estate, Patia, Bhubaneswar pursuant to the IPR 1986 and commenced commercial production on May 9, 1998 and is a continuing … issued by it under Section 19 of the Punjab General Clauses Act, 1898 which is similarly worded as Section 21 of the General Clauses Act, 1897 as also Section 22 of the Orissa General Clauses Act, 1937. The

M/s. Greatship (India) Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Service Tax Mumbai-I a ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Service Tax

“Supply of Tangible Goods for use” as has been defined under Section 65(105)(zzzzj) of Chapter V of the Finance Act, 1994 (hereinafter referred to as “the said Act”). It is also not in dispute that the appellant has … government of India in the Ministry of External Affairs Nos. S. O. 429 (E) dated the 18th July 1986 and S.O. 643 (E), dated the 19th September,1996 with immediate effect.” Notification No. 21/2009-S.T. Dated 07 Jul 2009

M/S Magma Fincorp Ltd. (Formerly Magma Leasing Limited) Vs. Rajesh Kum ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : MRTP

was paid by the Financier.3. The Complainant agreed to repay a sum of Rs.4,38,585/- which was inclusive of finance charges of Rs.83,650/- to the Financier in 35 monthly instalments of Rs.12,531/-, commencing from 1st August, 2002. The … 2018, filed by the Appellant [hereinafter referred to as the Financier]., under Section 21(b) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, against an order dated 31st August, 2017 passed by the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Uttar Pradesh [herein

Pioneer Urban Land and Infrastructure Limited Vs. Union of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

us the Global Derivatives Study Group and extracts from Philip Wood’s Project Finance, Subordinated Debt and State Loans; and 23 Principles of International Insolvency by … filed by allottees before them, until the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission finally decided that the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 was an additional remedy and continued to be an additional remedy to the remedies provided under RERA. They … and (zn) of section 2 of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 (16 of 2016);” 2. Section 21(6A)(b) “21. Committee of creditors (6A) Where a financial debt- (b) is owed to a class of creditors exceeding

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Kerala Electric Lamp Works Ltd. and Cro ...

Court : Kerala

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Finance Act, 2001; Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 32 and 32(1)

Reported in : (2003)183CTR(Ker)182; [2003]261ITR721(Ker)

said contention, it is necessary to refer to the Explanation added by the Finance Act, 2001. As per Section 21 of the Finance Act, 2001, Section 32 was amended as follows :'21. Amendment of Section 32. --In Section … learned standing counsel appearing for the Revenue, the Explanation inserted by the amendment to Section 32 by the Finance Act, 2001, with effect from April 1, 2002, would take us back to the position that whether or not … it was noticed that after the amendment of Section 34(1) by the Taxation laws (Amendment and Miscellaneous Provisions) Act, 1986, with effect from April 1, 1986, it was not necessary for the assessee to furnish the prescribed particulars

Cit Vs. Kerala Electric Lamp Works Ltd.

Court : Kerala

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : [2003]129TAXMAN549(Ker)

said contention, it is necessary to refer to the Explanation added by the Finance Act, 2001. As per section 21 of the Finance Act, 2001 section 32 was amended as follows :'21. Amendment of section 32-In section 32 … P.K.R. Menon, learned standing counsel appearing for the revenue, the Explanation inserted by amendment to section 32 by Finance Act, 2001 with effect from 1-4-2002 would take back to the position that whether or not the assessee claimed … it was noticed that after the amendment of section 34(1) by the Taxation Laws (Amendment and Mise. Provisions) Act, 1986 with effect from 1-4-1986, it was not necessary for the assessee to furnish the prescribed particulars for claiming