Advanced Search Results
Commissioner of Wealth Tax Vs. Cosmopolitan Hospitals (P) Ltd.
Kerala
Mar-04-2003
Direct Taxation
Finance Act, 1983 - Sections 40, 40(2) and 40(3)
(2003)185CTR(Ker)111; [2004]265ITR312(Ker)
under the WT Act, 1957 (for short 'the Act').2. The scope and ambit of Section 40(3)(vi) of the Finance Act, 1983, regarding the computation of net wealth of a closely-held company which was made liable to wealth-tax assessment as
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Asoka Betelnut Co. Pvt. Ltd.
Chennai
Nov-20-2002
Direct Taxation
Wealth Tax Act, 1957; ;Finance Act, 1983 - Sections 40 and 40(3)
(2003)180CTR(Mad)178
assessee is entitled to the exemption in view of the exclusionary clause found in Section 40(3)(vi) of the Finance Act 1983. Section 40(3)(vi) while including the building and the land appurtenant thereto for levy of wealth tax, excludes certain items
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskChunnilal Onkarmal (P.) Ltd. and anr. and Sir Sarupchand Hukamchand Pv ...
Madhya Pradesh
Mar-06-1994
Direct Taxation
Wealth Tax Act, 1957; Finance Act, 1983 - Sections 40; Constitution of India - Article 14; Finance Act, 1960 - Sections 13; Companies Act
(1994)121CTR(MP)116; [1996]221ITR459(MP)
are pending consideration.4. The petitioners have in this petition challenged the constitutional validity of Section 40 of the Finance Act, 1983, on the ground that it violates Article 14 of the Constitution of India. According to the petitioners, the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Commissioner of Wealth Tax Vs. Indian Warehousing Industries Ltd.
Chennai
Feb-04-2004
Direct Taxation
Finance Act, 1983 - Sections 40(3)
(2004)188CTR(Mad)283; [2004]269ITR203(Mad)
of the value of the warehouses as they were exempt under the provisions of Section 40(3) of the Finance Act, 1983?2. In order to appreciate the question of law, it is necessary to notice the facts in brief.Assessee is
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Tirupur Sri Meenakshi Sundareswarar ...
Chennai
Nov-20-2002
Direct Taxation
Wealth Tax Act, 1957; Finance Act, 1983 - Sections 40(3); Income Tax Act
(2003)180CTR(Mad)174; [2003]262ITR129(Mad)
by the assessee was not an asset exigible to wealth tax within the meaning of section 40(3)(vi) of Finance Act, 1983?2.The short facts are that the assessee is a closely held company in which the public are not substantially
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Wealth-tax Vs. Bombay Conductors and Electrical Ltd.
Gujarat
Jun-27-2002
Direct Taxation
Wealth Tax Act, 1957; Finance Act, 1983 - Sections 40(3)
[2002]258ITR667(Guj)
law in coming to the conclusion that the assessee is entitled to exemption under Section 40(3)(vi) of the Finance Act, 1983, for the residential property on the ground that the same was used for guest house and business premise
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Commissioner of Wealth-tax Vs. Fagun Co. P. Ltd.
Chennai
Sep-11-2006
Direct Taxation
Wealth-tax Act, 1957 - Sections 7(2), 7(3), 27(3) and 45; Finance Act, 1983 - Sections 3, 40 and 40(3); Income Tax Act - Sections 2, 32A and 32A(2; Finance Act, 1960 - Sections 13; Finance Act, 1992
2007(1)CTC13; (2006)205CTR(Mad)225; [2006]286ITR297(Mad); (2006)4MLJ836
assessee is entitled to the exemption in view of the exclusionary clause found in Section 40(3)(vi) of the Finance Act, 1983. Section 40(3)(vi) while including the building and the land appurtenant thereto for levy of wealth-tax, excludes certain items of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Wealth-tax Vs. Kodaikanal Club
Chennai
Dec-31-2002
Direct Taxation
Finance Act, 1983 - Sections 40, 40(1), 40(6) and 40(7); Wealth Tax Act, 1957 - Sections 2, 3 and 21AA; Finance Act, 1960 - Sections 13; Societies Registration Act, 1860; Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2(17) and 2(18)
(2003)181CTR(Mad)534; [2003]260ITR617(Mad)
the assessee-club became inexigible to wealth-tax from the assessment year 1974-75 onwards. However, by Section 40 of the Finance Act, 1983, the levy of wealth-tax on closely held companies was revived. Hence, the assessee-club by its representation dated January
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Wealth Tax Vs. Cadmach Machinery Co. Pvt. Ltd.
Gujarat
Oct-05-2006
Direct Taxation
Wealth Tax Act, 1957 - Sections 2, 3 and 27(1); Finance (Amendment) Act, 1983 - Sections 40, 40(2) and 40(3); Finance Act, 1988 - Sections 87
(2007)212CTR(Guj)285
in actual use for the purpose of business as contemplated under the provisions of Section 40(3)(vi) of the Finance Act, 1983?(2) Whether, by allowing the claim of the assessee, the appellate Tribunal has not caused violation to the plain
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSita World Travel (i) (P.) Ltd. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax.
Delhi
Mar-28-1995
Direct Taxation
[1995]55ITD357(Delhi)
to the tourists. In this connection he invited our attention to the provisions of section 40 of the Finance Act, 1983, where by Wealth-tax was revived in the case of closely-held companies. He further referred to the provisions of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »