Advanced Search Results
Tata Export Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Madhya Pradesh
Jul-30-1985
Excise
Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 2, 3 and 35; Finance Act, 1982 - Sections 51; Companies Act, 1956; Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rules 9, 9(1), 49, 49(1) and 176; Constitution of India - Articles 19(1) and 226
1986(8)ECC106; 1989(20)LC204(MP); 1985(22)ELT732(MP); 1986MPLJ561
slurry and nitrocellulose lacquer under Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944, and also challenging Section 51 of the Finance Act, 1982 and Notification dated 20-2-1982 giving retrospective effect to Rules 9 and 49 of the Central Excise Rules, 1944, … consideration is the contention of the respondents that since the petitioner had an alternative remedy of appeal Under Section 35 of the Central Excise Act against the impugned orders, the present petition is not tenable. The Supreme Court
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDharmodayam Company Vs. Union of India (Uoi)
Kerala
May-31-2005
Civil
Kerala Chitties Act, 1975 - Sections 2(4), 3, 3(1), 3(2), 4, 4(1), 5, 6, 6(3), 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 17, 18, 19, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 29, 34, 35, 39, 40, 42, 43, 55, 56, 59, 60, 67, 72, 89 and 220; Kerala Finance Act, 2002; Chit Funds Act, 1982 - Sections 1(3), 2, 4(1), 7(3), 8, 9(1), 20 and 90; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1), 226, 245 to 255; Companies Act; Finance Act, 2002 - Sections 3(5) and 4; Kerala Chittis (Amendment) Act, 2002
AIR2005Ker253; [2005]126CompCas586(Ker); 2005(3)KLT332
constitutional validity of Sub-section 1(a) to Section 4 of the Kerala Chitties Act, 1975 introduced by the Kerala Finance Act, 2002 (Act 7 of 2002) with effect from 1.4.2002 as beyond the legislative competence of the State Legislature … be read in isolation. The same has to be read along with Section 1(3) of the Chit Funds Act, 1982. Section 1(3) of the Act states that the Chit Funds Act, 1982 shall come into force on such date … with transfer of rights by Foreman etc. Section 34 deals with meetings of the general body of subscribers. Section 35 to 39 deal with termination of chitties. Section 40 to 42 deal with inspection of documents by subscribers
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskWood Craft Products Ltd. Vs. Collector of C.Ex.
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Feb-24-1989
Excise
(1989)(22)ECC86
Officer of the Company in accordance with the Central Excise (Appeals) Rules, 1982. Shri D.N.Mehta, learned Advocate for the appellant-applicants wanted to argue on the … Mehta has relied on the following decisions :- (i) AIR 1977 Supreme Court 2221 - Bikram Dass v. Financial Commissioner & Ors.Government Woollen Mills, Srinagar v. Collector of Central Excise, Chandigarh.Steel Works Pvt. Ltd. v. Collector ofCentral … of an authorised person on those appeals as required under Section 35-B(6) of the Central Excises and Salt Act. In support of his argument, he has relied on this Tribunal's Orders No. S. 179-180/88-D dated 2.12.1988.3. Arguing
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Collr. of C. Ex. Vs. Tata Engineering and Locomotive Co. Ltd.
Patna
Nov-16-1998
Excise
Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 3, 11, 11A, 35G(1), 35G(3), 37, 37(16A) and 37(16B); Central Excise (Amendment) Act, 1978; Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959 - Sections 33(6) and 35; Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1953 - Sections 14(6); Finance Act, 1982 - Sections 51; Limitation Act, 1963 - Schedule - Article 137; Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rules 9, 10, 10A, 49 and 57A to 57J; Constitution of India - Article 14
cause of action. The question that is really involved is whether in view of Section 51 of the Finance Act, 1982, Section 11A should be ignored or not. In our view Section 51 does not, in any manner, affect the … was contended that no time-limit was provided in this specific provision, while for taking actions in other cases, Section 35 provided time-limit and therefore the provisions should be held to be ultra vires. The Supreme Court applied the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIndia Pistons Limited Vs. Assistant Collector of Central Excise, Madra ...
Chennai
Sep-23-1986
Excise
Companies Act, 1956; Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rule 223-A; Central Excise Act - Sections 11-A; Central Excises Act - Sections 35, 35-B(2), 35-EE and 35-EE(2); Customs Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal (Procedure) Rules, 1982 - Rule 41
1987(12)ECC243; 1987(27)ELT651(Mad)
Tribunal was not maintainable, in view of the amendments to the Central Excises & Salt Act by the Finance Act, 1984. It was stated that any appeal in respect of loss of goods or shortage of goods in … the jurisdiction of the Tribunal, Rule 41 of the Customs Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal (Procedure) Rules, 1982 is wider in its comprehension. Therefore, the order of transfer is unexceptionable. In this case, having come to … demand made by the first respondent was carried under the provisions of Section 11-A of the Central Excise Act. It was further contended that the … Excise, Nungambakkam, Madras) acting under the powers vested in him under section 35-B(2) of the Central Excises and Salt Act, directed the Superintended of Central
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJ.K. Cotton Spinning and Weaving Vs. Collector of Central Excise
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Jan-31-1989
Excise
(1989)(23)LC385Tri(Delhi)
cause of action. The question that is really involved is whether in view of Section 51 of the Finance Act, 1982. Section 11A should be ignored or not. In our view Section 51 does not, in any manner affect the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCollector of Central Excise and Vs. Papyrus Papers Ltd.
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Jul-28-1989
Land Acquisition
(1989)(24)ECC150
(2) of Section 36. (v) That meanwhile the Central Excises & Salt Act, 1944 was amended by the Finance (No. 2) Act of 1980 making provisions for the constitution of this Tribunal and substituting a new Chapter … passed "The Customs, Central Excise & Gold (Control) Removal of Difficulties Order, 1982 making the provisions of this Order enforceable from 11th day of October, … and examine the record of any proceeding in which any decision or order has been passed under erstwhile Section 35 or 35A of the Act for the purpose of satisfying itself as to the correctness, legality or propriety
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskT.R. Ganapathy Chettiar Vs. Income-tax Officer
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Madras
Nov-09-1998
Direct Taxation
(1999)240ITR33(Mad.)
history would be necessary to keep the matter in the right perspective.The development rebate was introduced by the Finance Act, 1955. In the Budget Speech ([1955] 27 ITR (St.) 42), the Finance Minister referred to the recommendation of … For the assessment year 1980-81, the assessment was made on April 15, 1982, determining the total income at Rs. 64,925 after setting off business loss … or for creation of asset or remittance abroad for a period of eight years.Sub-section (11) was introduced in section 35 to enable the Income-tax Officer to withdraw the allowance granted by recomputing the income in case of any
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Income-tax Vs. Gujarat State Fertilizers Co. Ltd.
Gujarat
Oct-19-2002
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 32A, 43(1), 43A and 43A(1)
(2003)179CTR(Guj)266; [2003]259ITR526(Guj)
(No. 2) Act of 1967, with effect from April 1, 1967, whereas Section 32A was inserted by the Finance Act, 1976, with effect from April 1, 1976. Hence, the non obstante clause in Section 43A could not have … as business expenditure. Vide order in I. T. R. Nos. 968,1235 and 2168/Ahd of 1979, dated April 7, 1982, the Tribunal had taken the view that payment of interest on deferred credit facility was allowable as business … even in respect of development rebate. Section 43A(1) itself refers to Section 35(1)(iv) {capital expenditure on scientific research related to the business) and Section 35A
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAmreli District Co-operative Sale and Purchase Union Ltd. and ors. Vs. ...
Gujarat
Jul-17-1984
Trusts and Societies
(1984)2GLR1244
time to classify distinctly the various societies having regard to their object, finance and methods of working. It was also for the first time that … 1981 (hereinafter referred to as 'the impugned Act of 1981) and the Gujarat Co-operative Societies (Amendment and Validation) Act, 1982 (hereinafter referred to as 'the impugned Act of 1982) by which the Gujarat Co-operative Societies Act, 1961 (hereinafter … challenge is Section 17-A introduced in the principal Act by Section 2 of the impugned amending Act of 1982. Section 17-A should be set out in extenso since it is one of the very important provisions which have … Sections 83 and 160 of the principal Act by Sections 19 and 35 respectively of the said amending Act is bad in law and void
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »