Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: finance act 1981 section 32 · Page 1 of about 2,424 results (0.069 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Nov 29 1984

Goodlass Nerolac Paints Ltd. Vs. Income-tax Officer.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Nov-29-1984

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : [1985]11ITD767(Mum)

section 32(2A) as well as the facts that, subsequently, the Legislature has itself omitted item 26 by the Finance Act, 1981, with effect from 1-4-1982, I hold that the appellant is entitled to the deduction of investment allowance claimed

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 19 2001

Ram Nath Jindal Vs. Cit

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jul-19-2001

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2001)170CTR(P& H)251

has not been claimed by the assessee. This position is further obvious from the fact that in the Finance Act, 2001, Explnation 5 has been inserted in section 32(1)(ii) with effect from 1-4-2002. It has been inter alia … law in having interpreted the orders passed by the Income Tax Officer for the asst yrs. 1980-81 and 1981-82 to mean that the depreciation had actually been worked and separately allowed by the Income Tax Officer for

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 16 1984

Aluminium Industries Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Oct-16-1984

Subject : Customs

Acts : Customs Tariff Act, 1975 - Sections 2 and 3; Finance Act, 1981 - Sections 47; Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 2(11), 2(12), 2(23), 2(27), 2(28), 7, 8, 12, 14, 15, 15(1), 16, 17, 25, 25(1), 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 45, 46, 47, 48, 68, 106, 110, 111, 113 and 115; Finance Act, 1980 - Sections 4(4) and 47; Customs Act, 1886; Customs Tariff Act, 1894; Sea Customs Act, 1878 - Sections 37, 57 and 86; Customs Rules; Customs Regulations

Reported in : 1985(4)ECC1; 1985LC554(Kerala); 1999(110)ELT474(Ker)

30, 31, 32, 33, 34.45, 46, 47, 48, 68, 106, 110, 111, 115; Finance Act, 1980, Section 4(4); Finance Act, 1981, Section 47; Customs Tariff Act, 1975, Section 3 ; Countervailing Duty; Notfn. Nos. 176/79-CUS., 186/79-CUS, 41/80-CUS., 75/81-CUS., 76/81-CUS. -

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

May 23 2012

Test Claimants in the Franked Investment Income Group Litigation Vs. C ...

Court : UK Supreme Court

Decided on : May-23-2012

Subject : Land Acquisition

such cases: para 260. It was not open to the Revenue to rely on section 320 of the Finance Act 2004 ("Section 320 FA 2004") or section 107 of the Finance Act 2007 ("Section 107 FA 2007") to … FA 2007") to exclude DMG mistake claims, as these provisions purported to curtail the extended limitation period under section 32(1)(c) of the Limitation Act 1980 without notice and without providing any transitional arrangements to protect the right under

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 15 2001

Kalyani Exports and Investments Vs. Deputy Commissioner of

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Pune

Decided on : Jan-15-2001

Subject : Land Acquisition

on the 1st day of April, 1981, whichever is later." The insertion of the above Explanation by the Finance Act, 1992 with effect from 1-4-1993 has made a significant difference in the matter of computation of capital gains. … the capital gains, the assessee adopted the fair market value as on 1-4-1981 as per the provisions of section 55(2)(b). The Assessing Officer held that the assessee was not entitled to exercise this option because as on … 10(2)(vi) and section 10(2)(xiv) of the 1922 Act or both under section 32(1)(ii) and section 35(1)(iv) of the 1961 Act. The use of the words

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 26 2014

M/s. Bharti Airtel Ltd. Vs. The Commissioner of Central Excise

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-26-2014

Subject : Service Tax

amount of Rs.2,04,39,093/- under provisions of Rule 14 of the Credit Rules read with Section 73 of the Finance Act,1994. In respect of towers and parts thereof, prefabricated building, printers and office chairs, the Commissioner observed that the … CCE Vs. Sai Sahmita Storages Ltd., (2011(23) L.T.R. 341(A.P.)); (d) Bannari Amman Sugars Ltd. Vs. CCE, (2010(250) ELT 326 (Kar); (e) CCE New Delhi Vs. Hindustan Sanitary-ware and Industries Ltd. (2002(145) ELT (SC)); (f) Orders of the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 07 1984

Aluminium Industries Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Feb-07-1984

Subject : ExciseCustoms

Acts : Customs Tariff Act, 1975 - Sections 2, 2(11), 2(13), 2(23), 2(25), 2(26), 2(27), 3, 12, 13, 14, 15, 18 to 24, 25, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 37, 45 to 49 and 68; Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 15(1) and 25(1); Finance Act, 1981; Central Excise Act

Reported in : 1984(2)ECC164; 1984(16)ELT183(Ker)

numbered as 75 and 76 were issued. The effect of the first, read with the provisions of the Finance Act, 1981 was to re-impose auxiliary duty up to 5%. And the effect of the second, rescinding the notification dated … duty on aluminium ingots imported by the petitioner-company.2. Duties are leviable under three heads :-(i) Basic duty under Section 2 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975;(ii) Auxiliary duty of customs under the Finance Act; and(iii) Additional duty … unloaded, and the unloading shall be at approved places only, under Sections 32 and 33. Section 34 insists that unloading shall be under the supervision

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 26 1990

Marine Engg. Services (P.) Ltd. Vs. Income-tax Officer

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Madras

Decided on : Apr-26-1990

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (1990)34ITD77(Mad.)

Income-tax Officer rejected the claim for investment allowance but treated the assessee as an industrial company under the Finance Act for the purpose of levying tax at a concessional rate.4. The Commissioner of Income-tax on a review of … on a review of the aforesaid assessments held that the assessee was not entitled to investment allowance under Section 32 A and deduction under Section 80J as well as concessional rate of tax for the assessment year 1981-82

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 19 2001

Ram Nath Jindal and anr. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jul-19-2001

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income-tax Act, 1961 - Sections 16, 32, 32(1), 34, 37, 41(2) and 143(1); Finance Act, 2001

Reported in : [2001]252ITR590(P& H)

has not been claimed by the assessee. This position is further obvious from the fact that in the Finance Act, 2001, Explanation 5 has been inserted in Section 32(1)(ii) with effect from April 1, 2002. It has been, … in law in having interpreted the orders passed by the Income-tax Officer for the assessment years 1980-81 and 1981-82 to mean that the depreciation had actually been worked out and separately allowed by the Income-tax Officer for

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 02 2026

Vedanta Limited vs the Assistant Director of

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jun-02-2026

respect of physical assets used in that connection, except assets on which allowance for depreciation is admissible under section 32: …..(word “and” omitted - substituted for “in such business of the Central Government” by the Finance Act, 1981, … the association or participation of the Central Government (substituted for ‘in such business of the Central Government” by Finance Act, 1981, with effect from 01.04.1981) or any person authorised by it in such business which agreement has been laid

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial