Advanced Search Results
Goodlass Nerolac Paints Ltd. Vs. Income-tax Officer.
Mumbai
Nov-29-1984
Direct Taxation
[1985]11ITD767(Mum)
section 32(2A) as well as the facts that, subsequently, the Legislature has itself omitted item 26 by the Finance Act, 1981, with effect from 1-4-1982, I hold that the appellant is entitled to the deduction of investment allowance claimed
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRam Nath Jindal Vs. Cit
Punjab and Haryana
Jul-19-2001
Direct Taxation
(2001)170CTR(P& H)251
has not been claimed by the assessee. This position is further obvious from the fact that in the Finance Act, 2001, Explnation 5 has been inserted in section 32(1)(ii) with effect from 1-4-2002. It has been inter alia … law in having interpreted the orders passed by the Income Tax Officer for the asst yrs. 1980-81 and 1981-82 to mean that the depreciation had actually been worked and separately allowed by the Income Tax Officer for
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAluminium Industries Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)
Kerala
Oct-16-1984
Customs
Customs Tariff Act, 1975 - Sections 2 and 3; Finance Act, 1981 - Sections 47; Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 2(11), 2(12), 2(23), 2(27), 2(28), 7, 8, 12, 14, 15, 15(1), 16, 17, 25, 25(1), 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 45, 46, 47, 48, 68, 106, 110, 111, 113 and 115; Finance Act, 1980 - Sections 4(4) and 47; Customs Act, 1886; Customs Tariff Act, 1894; Sea Customs Act, 1878 - Sections 37, 57 and 86; Customs Rules; Customs Regulations
1985(4)ECC1; 1985LC554(Kerala); 1999(110)ELT474(Ker)
30, 31, 32, 33, 34.45, 46, 47, 48, 68, 106, 110, 111, 115; Finance Act, 1980, Section 4(4); Finance Act, 1981, Section 47; Customs Tariff Act, 1975, Section 3 ; Countervailing Duty; Notfn. Nos. 176/79-CUS., 186/79-CUS, 41/80-CUS., 75/81-CUS., 76/81-CUS. -
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Test Claimants in the Franked Investment Income Group Litigation Vs. C ...
UK Supreme Court
May-23-2012
Land Acquisition
such cases: para 260. It was not open to the Revenue to rely on section 320 of the Finance Act 2004 ("Section 320 FA 2004") or section 107 of the Finance Act 2007 ("Section 107 FA 2007") to … FA 2007") to exclude DMG mistake claims, as these provisions purported to curtail the extended limitation period under section 32(1)(c) of the Limitation Act 1980 without notice and without providing any transitional arrangements to protect the right under
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKalyani Exports and Investments Vs. Deputy Commissioner of
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Pune
Jan-15-2001
Land Acquisition
on the 1st day of April, 1981, whichever is later." The insertion of the above Explanation by the Finance Act, 1992 with effect from 1-4-1993 has made a significant difference in the matter of computation of capital gains. … the capital gains, the assessee adopted the fair market value as on 1-4-1981 as per the provisions of section 55(2)(b). The Assessing Officer held that the assessee was not entitled to exercise this option because as on … 10(2)(vi) and section 10(2)(xiv) of the 1922 Act or both under section 32(1)(ii) and section 35(1)(iv) of the 1961 Act. The use of the words
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM/s. Bharti Airtel Ltd. Vs. The Commissioner of Central Excise
Mumbai
Aug-26-2014
Service Tax
amount of Rs.2,04,39,093/- under provisions of Rule 14 of the Credit Rules read with Section 73 of the Finance Act,1994. In respect of towers and parts thereof, prefabricated building, printers and office chairs, the Commissioner observed that the … CCE Vs. Sai Sahmita Storages Ltd., (2011(23) L.T.R. 341(A.P.)); (d) Bannari Amman Sugars Ltd. Vs. CCE, (2010(250) ELT 326 (Kar); (e) CCE New Delhi Vs. Hindustan Sanitary-ware and Industries Ltd. (2002(145) ELT (SC)); (f) Orders of the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAluminium Industries Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)
Kerala
Feb-07-1984
ExciseCustoms
Customs Tariff Act, 1975 - Sections 2, 2(11), 2(13), 2(23), 2(25), 2(26), 2(27), 3, 12, 13, 14, 15, 18 to 24, 25, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 37, 45 to 49 and 68; Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 15(1) and 25(1); Finance Act, 1981; Central Excise Act
1984(2)ECC164; 1984(16)ELT183(Ker)
numbered as 75 and 76 were issued. The effect of the first, read with the provisions of the Finance Act, 1981 was to re-impose auxiliary duty up to 5%. And the effect of the second, rescinding the notification dated … duty on aluminium ingots imported by the petitioner-company.2. Duties are leviable under three heads :-(i) Basic duty under Section 2 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975;(ii) Auxiliary duty of customs under the Finance Act; and(iii) Additional duty … unloaded, and the unloading shall be at approved places only, under Sections 32 and 33. Section 34 insists that unloading shall be under the supervision
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMarine Engg. Services (P.) Ltd. Vs. Income-tax Officer
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Madras
Apr-26-1990
Direct Taxation
(1990)34ITD77(Mad.)
Income-tax Officer rejected the claim for investment allowance but treated the assessee as an industrial company under the Finance Act for the purpose of levying tax at a concessional rate.4. The Commissioner of Income-tax on a review of … on a review of the aforesaid assessments held that the assessee was not entitled to investment allowance under Section 32 A and deduction under Section 80J as well as concessional rate of tax for the assessment year 1981-82
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRam Nath Jindal and anr. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax
Punjab and Haryana
Jul-19-2001
Direct Taxation
Income-tax Act, 1961 - Sections 16, 32, 32(1), 34, 37, 41(2) and 143(1); Finance Act, 2001
[2001]252ITR590(P& H)
has not been claimed by the assessee. This position is further obvious from the fact that in the Finance Act, 2001, Explanation 5 has been inserted in Section 32(1)(ii) with effect from April 1, 2002. It has been, … in law in having interpreted the orders passed by the Income-tax Officer for the assessment years 1980-81 and 1981-82 to mean that the depreciation had actually been worked out and separately allowed by the Income-tax Officer for
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskVedanta Limited vs the Assistant Director of
Chennai
Jun-02-2026
respect of physical assets used in that connection, except assets on which allowance for depreciation is admissible under section 32: …..(word “and” omitted - substituted for “in such business of the Central Government” by the Finance Act, 1981, … the association or participation of the Central Government (substituted for ‘in such business of the Central Government” by Finance Act, 1981, with effect from 01.04.1981) or any person authorised by it in such business which agreement has been laid
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »