Advanced Search Results

Combatta Aviation Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Delhi

Subject : Civil

Acts : Finance Act, 1979 - Sections 28(3), 35(1), 35(2), 38(3) and 38(5); FTT Rules, 1979 - Rules 4, 9 and 10A

Reported in : 2000(68)ECC52; 2000LC390(Delhi); 2000(115)ELT622(Del)

in the Finance Act and FTT Rules. The penalty imposed on the applicant is justified. Impugned order upheld. Finance Act, 1979: Section 38(3); FTT Rules, 1979: Rule 10A.Revision Application rejected. - LABOUR & SERVICES Disability Pension: [Vikramajit Sen, Sanjiv Khanna

Union of India (Uoi) and ors. Vs. Modi Rubber Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rules 2 and 8(1); Finance Act, 1979 - Sections 32(4); Central Excise Laws (Amendment and Validation) Act, 1982; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 3; Additional Duty of Excise (Goods of Special Importance) Act, 1957

Reported in : AIR1986SC1992a; 1986(10)ECC73; 1986(25)ELT849(SC); JT1986(1)SC178; 1986(2)SCALE269; (1986)4SCC66; [1986]3SCR587; 1986(2)LC646(SC)

we reproduce the relevant provision in only one of the Finance Acts. We propose to refer to the Finance Act 1979 since that is the Finance Act which was in operation when the present controversy in regard to the … The manufacture of tires is subject to duty of excise under the Central Excise and Salt Act 1944. Section 3 Sub-section(i) of this Act provides that there shall be levied and collected in such manner as may be

Singapore Airlines Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Customs

Acts : Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 129DD; Finance Act, 1979 - Sections 35(2), 35A(1) and 38(3); Finance Act, 1997 - Sections 38; Foreign Travel Tax Rules, 1979 - Rules 4, 9 and 10A

Reported in : 2004(73)DRJ168; 2004(94)ECC332; 2004(175)ELT89(Del)

imposing a penalty of Rs.2,07,840/- under Section 35A(1) {clarified in the impugned order as Section 38(3)} of the Finance Act, 1979 (as amended){for short the Act} read with Rule 4 of the Foreign Travel Tax Rules, 1979 (as amended),

Collector of Central Excise Vs. Mihir Textiles Ltd.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Subject : Excise

Reported in : (1990)(30)LC491Tri(Mum.)bai

Rules 9 and 49 and retrospective validity of the said amendment brought out by Sec. 51 of the Finance Act, are valid. However, the Supreme Court did not accept the contention of the Learned Attorney General that the … Learned Senior Counsel in the case of Jay Engineering Works reported in 1979 (4) ELT J 307, in the case of Hydraulics Ltd. reported in … merely refer to Section 51(2)(d). It also refers to the provisions of Rule 9 of the Rules and Section 3 of the CESA. It also indicates that the duty is payable in respect of captively consumed yarn which

Assistant Collector of Customs (imports) Vs. Sundaram Textiles

Court : Chennai

Subject : Customs

Acts : Customs Tariff Act, 1975

Reported in : 1990(25)ECC392; 1989(25)LC470(Madras); 1989(44)ELT464(Mad)

Customs Tariff Act, 1975, and an auxiliary duty of 20 per cent leviable under Section 32(1) of the finance Act 1976, together with an additional duty leviable under Section 3 of the Customs Tariff Act 1976. However, by … together under a common judgment. 2. Appellants in these writ appeals are the respondents in W.P. 298 of 1979 and W.P. 459 of 1979 (and will hereinafter be referred to as the respondents). The respondent in W.A.

Gopal Hosiery Vs. Assistant Collector of C. Ex.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 2, 3, 11B and 37; ;Finance Act, 1971; ;Medicinal and Toilet Preparations (Excise Duties) Act, 1955 - Section 2; ;Factories Act, 1948 - Section 2; ;Finance Act, 1975; ;Finance Act, 1977; ;Finance Act, 1978; ;Finance Act, 1979; ;Finance Act (No. 2), 1980; ;Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 - Sections 2(3) and 6; ;Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rules 8, 8(1) and 174

Reported in : 1989(41)ELT35(Cal)

1977, and then increased to 5% by the Finance Act, 1978 and finally increased to 8% by the Finance Act, 1979. It has been stated by the petitioners that they have paid excise duty from March, 1975 to 31st … power were expressly excluded from taxability under tariff item No. 22D.5. The contention of the petitioner is that Section 3 which is the charging Section of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944, provides for levy and collection

Madhukar Govindrao Thaware and ors. Vs. Central Bank of India

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

Subject : Limitation

Acts : Limitation Act - Section 5, 29 (2), 8, 3; Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and financial Institutions Act (RDDBFI) 1993- Section 30, 2(b) , 19, 20; Income Tax Act, 1961 - Rule 11, 15; Central Excise Act. 1944 - Section 35H(1); West Bengal Land Reforms Act, 1955 - Section 8 ; Finance Act, 1979 - Section 38 (1); Companies Act, 1956 - section 529A, 20 (3), 25 to 28, 30; Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act,; Non-Performing Assets Act (NPA) - Section 17(1); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 21; Income Tax Act, 1961 - Section 260A; Excise Act - Section 35G; The Income-tax (Certificate Proceedings) Rules, 1962 - Rule 55A, 86 ; Debt Recovery Tribunal (Procedure) Rules - Rule 2

with non- payment. Non-payment is nothing but failure to pay when due. As per the provisions of the Finance Act, 1979 amount of FTT collected becomes due within fifteen days from the date of collection thereof. Failure to pay … appeal or application a period of limitation different from the period prescribed by the Schedule, the provisions of section 3 shall apply as if such period were the period prescribed by the Schedule and for the purpose of

South Indian Bank Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax

Court : Kerala

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Finance Act, 1985; Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 36, 36(1) and 36(2)

Reported in : (2003)183CTR(Ker)21; [2003]262ITR579(Ker)

bad and doubtful debts account. Clause (viia) which was inserted with effect from April 1, 1980, by the Finance Act, 1979, provided for a deduction in respect of any provision for bad and doubtful debts made by a scheduled … these appeals is regarding the scope and ambit of the proviso to Clause (vii) of Sub-section (1) of Section 36 of the Act. Since the aforesaid question is a purely legal issue, it is not necessary to … ambit of the proviso to Clause (vii) of Sub-section (1) of Section 36 of the Act. Since the aforesaid question is a purely legal issue,

South Indian Bank Ltd. Vs. Cit

Court : Kerala

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : [2003]130TAXMAN749(Ker)

provisions for bad and doubtful debts account. Clause (viia) which was inserted with effect from 1-4-1980 by the Finance Act, 1979 provided for a deduction in respect of any provision for bad and doubtful debts made by a Scheduled … these appeals is regarding the scope and ambit of the proviso to clause (vii) of sub-section (1) of section 36 of the Act. Since the aforesaid question is a purely legal issue. It is not necessary to … ambit of the proviso to clause (vii) of sub-section (1) of section 36 of the Act. Since the aforesaid question is a purely legal issue.

Dhanalakshmi Bank Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Kerala

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 36(1)

Reported in : 2003(3)KLT177

provisions for bad and doubtful debts account. Clause (viia) which was inserted with effect from 1.4.1980 by the Finance Act, 1979 provided for a deduction in respect of any provision for bad and doubtful debts made by a Scheduled … these Appeals is regarding the scope and ambit of the proviso to Clause (vii) of Sub-section (1) of Section 36 of the Act. Since the aforesaid question is a purely legal issue, it is not necessary to … ambit of the proviso to Clause (vii) of Sub-section (1) of Section 36 of the Act. Since the aforesaid question is a purely legal issue,