Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: finance act 1976 section 34 · Page 1 of about 1,790 results (0.046 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Apr 04 2007

Binani Industries Ltd., Kerala Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Commercia ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-04-2007

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957 - Sections 3A, 5, 5C, 12A, 13A(1), 20, 21, 21(1), 21(2), 22, 22A, 23, 24 and 25A; Customs Act, 1873; Karnataka Taxation laws (Second Amendment) Act, 1996 - Sections 5C, 5(3), 5(91), 7 and 21; Karnataka Tax on Luxuries Act, 1979; Karnataka Tax on Professions, Trades, Callings and Employments Act, 1976; Karnataka Entertainments Tax Act, 1958; Karnataka Agricultural Income Tax Act, 1957; Sale of Goods Act, 1930 - Sections 4; Finance Act, 1952; Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 34 and 35(10); Finance Act, 1956; Karnataka Sales Tax Rules, 1957 - Rule 6(4); Constitution of India - Article 366

Reported in : JT2007(5)SC311; 2007(5)SCALE429; 2007(1)LC0515(SC); (2007)6VST783(SC); 2007AIRSCW3071; JT2007(5)SC311; 2007-08(6)VATToday128; 2007(2)KCCRSN81; 2007(4)AIRKarR295

income tax for the year 1952-53, the appellant, a company had been granted under the provisions of the finance Act, 1952, a rebate on a portion of its profits of the previous year, that is, 1951 which it … mentioned Acts; i) Karnataka Tax on Luxuries Act, 1979. ii) Karnataka Tax on Professions, Trades, Callings and Employments Act, 1976. iii) Karnataka Entertainments Tax Act, 1958. iv) Karnataka Agricultural Income Tax Act, 1957. v) Karnataka Sales Tax Act, … that if the language expressly so states or clearly implies, retrospectivity must be given to the provision. Under Section 34 of the Income Tax Act, 1922, it is the service of the notice which is the sine qua

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 16 1986

Rajesh Ahuja and ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Jun-16-1986

Subject : Property

Reported in : 1986WLN(UC)338

be acquired. Thereafter a notice Ex. 6 was issued by the Government in exercise of its power under Section 34 of the Act of 1976 for revising the order dated 4th February, 1982 passed by the Competent Authority, … has been exercised by the Deputy Secretary to the Government in the Finance Department. Under the Rules of Business such power can be delegated and … dated 4th February, 1982 (Ex.5) where by the competent authority under the Rajasthan Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 (here in after referred to as the Act of 1976) has acquired the excess land held by the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 20 2000

Seshasayee Paper and Boards Ltd. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Madras

Decided on : Dec-20-2000

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2003)84ITD707(Mad.)

brought forward investment allowance in preference to unabsorbed depreciation. Sri Suryanarayanan submitted that Section 32A was inserted by Finance Act, 1976, w.e.f.1st April, 1976, and that the scope and effect of Section 32A had been elaborated in the Circular … the condition that the allowance of depreciation under Section 32(1) would be allowed subject to the provisions of Section 34. It was pointed out that Sub-section (1) of Section 34 providing that the allowance of depreciation would be

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Nov 06 2003

Varnica Herbs, Rep. by Power of Attorney V. Viswanathan Vs. Central Bo ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Nov-06-2003

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 4(1), 4A, 37B and 38B; Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 - Sections 82 and 83; Standards of Weights and Measurements (Packaged Commodities) Rules, 1977 - Rules 2, 6, 17, 34 and 34(1); Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1) and 265; Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985; Finance Act, 1997 - Sections 82

Reported in : 2004(91)ECC493; 2003LC387(Madras); 2004(163)ELT160(Mad)

Central Government introduced Section 4A of the Act with effect from 14.5.1997 as per Section 82 of the Finance Act, 1997, which contains a special provision for the valuation of excisable goods with reference to retail sale price, … contrary to Section 38B of the Central Excise Act, 1944, Section 83(r) of Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976, Rules 17 and 34(1)(b) of the Standards of Weights and Measurements (Packaged Commodities) Rules, 1977.2. Petitioner firm is

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 22 2007

Jayanti Food Processing (P) Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, R ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-22-2007

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 2A, 2(17), 3(2), 4, 4A, 4A(1), 4A(2) and 6; Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 - Sections 2, 83 and 83(2); Standards of Weights and Measures (Packaged Commodities) Rules, 1977 - Rules 1(3), 2, 2A, 3, 6, 6(1), 15, 16, 17, 23(1), 23(2), 29 and 34; Finance Act, 1997 - Sections 4A and 82; Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985

Reported in : 2007(121)ECC1; JT2007(10)SC327; (2007)8SCC34; [2007]10STT375; 2007(2)LC1002(SC)

Section 4A more particularly Sub-sections (1) and (2) thereof. Section 4A was added by Section 82 of the Finance Act, 1997 (Act 26 of 1997) which amendment was with effect from 14.5.1997. Section 4A, as it originally stood, … Excise Act, 1944 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') and the provisions of Standards of Weights & Measures Act, 1976 (hereinafter referred to as 'the SWM Act') as also the Standards of Weights & Measures (Packaged Commodities) Rules, … of Section 4A of the Act, it would be clear that where there is a general exemption like Section 34 under the SWM (PC) Rules such goods and/or packages of such goods shall not be covered by Section

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 03 1984

Tamilnadu Steels Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on : Apr-03-1984

Subject : Excise

Reported in : (1985)(0)LC934Tri(Delhi)

of the Central Excise Rules, 1944. Since the auxiliary duty had been levied under Section 36 of the Finance Act, 1976, any exemption in respect of auxiliary duty had to be granted under a Notification issued under Rule 8(1) … P. Chidambaram, Advocate appearing on behalf of the Appellants, stated that the auxiliary excise duty levied under Section 34(5) of the Finance Act, 1975 read with Notification No. 128/75 dated 12.5.1975 or Notification No. 176/76 dated 27.5.1976,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 14 2008

Central Bank of India Vs. Coast West Ferro Alloys and 7 ors.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Oct-14-2008

Subject : SICA

Acts : Sick Industrial Companies Act - Sections 2, 3, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 19A, 20, 21, 22, 22(1), 22A, 25, 29 and 32; Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 72A; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 7, Rule 11; Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973; Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976; Constitution of India - Article 39; Companies Act, 1956; Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 - Sections 34; Industrial Finance Corporation Act, 1948; State Financial Corporations Act, 1951; Unit Trust of India Act, 1963; Industrial Reconstruction Bank of India Act, 1984; Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985; Small Industries Development Bank of India Act, 1989

Reported in : (2009)1GLR59

Exh.44 that respondent being a sick unit declared by Board of Industrial Finance and Reconstruction (hereinafter referred to as 'BIFR'), therefore, under Section 22(1) of … provisions of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 (46 of 1973) and the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 (33 of 1976) for the time being in force or in the Memorandum or Articles of Association of … due under the RDDB Act. Chapter VI is Miscellaneous. One section, however, is of extreme importance. It is Section 34 which allows `overriding effect' to the provisions of the Act over other laws. It is a crucial provision

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 30 1997

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Beco Engineering Co.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jul-30-1997

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 33(1), 33(2) and 34(3); Finance Act, 1990

Reported in : [1998]232ITR102(P& H)

. Interpreting Sections 33 and 34 read with the Explanation to Section 34, which was added by the Finance Act of 1966, it was held (page 197) :'Having considered the matter at some length in the present case, … Insecticides and Allied Industries : [1981]127ITR796(AP) and Circular No. 189 (see [1976] 102 ITR 90), dated January 30, 1976, it was held by the Tribunal that the assessee was not bound to create the statutory development reserve

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 12 1992

Jay Engg. Works Ltd. Vs. Inspecting Assistant

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

Decided on : Aug-12-1992

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (1992)43ITD594(Delhi)

profits on the basis of assessee's own computation. Our attention was drawn to the explanatory notes to the Finance Act of 1976 issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes in support of the contention that in the … corresponding to Explanation to Section 32A(4). Secondly, Sub-section (9) of Section 32A which was akin to Explanation to Section 34(3)(a) has been omitted by the Finance Act of 1990 w.e.f. 1-4-1976. It was accordingly pleaded that the deduction

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 06 2007

Virtual Soft Systems Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi-i

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Feb-06-2007

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 28(1), 48, 143, 143(1), 143(1A), 260A, 271 and 271(1); Finance Act, 1975; Finance Act, 2002 - Sections 271; Taxation Laws (Amendment) Act, 1975; Finance Act, 1993; Finance Act, 1992; Finance Act, 1951; Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 23(5), 28 and 28(1); Constitution of India - Article 20(1)

Reported in : (2007)207CTR(SC)733; [2007]289ITR83(SC); JT2007(3)SC125; 2007(2)SCALE612; (2007)9SCC665

judgment in the Prithipal Singh's case holds good in respect of Section 271(1)(c) as it stood after the 1976 amendment and prior to its amendment by Finance Act, 2002. Contrary view is expressed in:i. P.R. Basavappa and … the Punjab and Haryana High Court pertaining to the assessment year 1970-71 was prior to the amendment of Finance Act, 1975 and therefore, was not applicable. For the same reason, the decision of this Court in affirming the … of 2005.Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi-I, the respondent herein, filed ITA No. 340 of 2004 in the High Court of Delhi against the order passed

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial