Advanced Search Results
Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. M. Manickasundaram
Chennai
Sep-08-1995
Direct Taxation
Finance Act, 1975 - Schedule I - Rule 7; Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2, 2(23), (39) and (48), 67, 139, 139(8), 183, 184, 184(7), 185, 185(1), 215, 246 and 256
[1996]220ITR133(Mad)
regard to the provisions of rules 5 and 7 in Part IV of the First Schedule to the Finance Act, 1975, the Appellate Tribunal was right in holding that the assessee's share of loss from a firm, known as … Abdul Hadi, J.1. All these tax cases references under section 256 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'), relate to the same assessee. Tax … extent of Rs. 1,23,528 against his own individual agricultural income of Rs. 23,060. This set off claimed has also been allowed likewise by the Tribunal
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAluminium Industries Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)
Kerala
Oct-16-1984
Customs
Customs Tariff Act, 1975 - Sections 2 and 3; Finance Act, 1981 - Sections 47; Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 2(11), 2(12), 2(23), 2(27), 2(28), 7, 8, 12, 14, 15, 15(1), 16, 17, 25, 25(1), 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 45, 46, 47, 48, 68, 106, 110, 111, 113 and 115; Finance Act, 1980 - Sections 4(4) and 47; Customs Act, 1886; Customs Tariff Act, 1894; Sea Customs Act, 1878 - Sections 37, 57 and 86; Customs Rules; Customs Regulations
1985(4)ECC1; 1985LC554(Kerala); 1999(110)ELT474(Ker)
48, 68, 106, 110, 111, 115; Finance Act, 1980, Section 4(4); Finance Act, 1981, Section 47; Customs Tariff Act, 1975, Section 3 ; Countervailing Duty; Notfn. Nos. 176/79-CUS., 186/79-CUS, 41/80-CUS., 75/81-CUS., 76/81-CUS. - Import of Aluminium Ingots--Bate of Duty
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskVirtual Soft Systems Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi-i
Supreme Court of India
Feb-06-2007
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 28(1), 48, 143, 143(1), 143(1A), 260A, 271 and 271(1); Finance Act, 1975; Finance Act, 2002 - Sections 271; Taxation Laws (Amendment) Act, 1975; Finance Act, 1993; Finance Act, 1992; Finance Act, 1951; Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 23(5), 28 and 28(1); Constitution of India - Article 20(1)
(2007)207CTR(SC)733; [2007]289ITR83(SC); JT2007(3)SC125; 2007(2)SCALE612; (2007)9SCC665
the Punjab and Haryana High Court pertaining to the assessment year 1970-71 was prior to the amendment of Finance Act, 1975 and therefore, was not applicable. For the same reason, the decision of this Court in affirming the decision … Court of Delhi against the order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (for short 'the Tribunal') under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act. Assessee also filed ITA No. of 2004 being aggrieved against a part … said case, this Court proceeded specifically on the footing that under section 23(5) of the 1922 Act, a registered firm was liable to pay tax
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Duncan Services Ltd. Vs. Income-tax Officer and Others
Delhi
Jan-13-1992
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 36(1), 37, 40A(7), 147, 147(B) and 148
[1992]198ITR264(Delhi)
submitted that, in regard to deduction on account of the gratuity payment, an amendment was introduced by the Finance Act, 1975, by way of section 40A(7). The change was introduced with retrospective effect from April 1, 1973. Accordingly to … S.B. Wad, J.1. This writ petition is directed against the notice dated March 23, 1978, issued by the Income-tax Officer, Company Circle, New Delhi, under section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDharmodayam Company Vs. Union of India (Uoi)
Kerala
May-31-2005
Civil
Kerala Chitties Act, 1975 - Sections 2(4), 3, 3(1), 3(2), 4, 4(1), 5, 6, 6(3), 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 17, 18, 19, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 29, 34, 35, 39, 40, 42, 43, 55, 56, 59, 60, 67, 72, 89 and 220; Kerala Finance Act, 2002; Chit Funds Act, 1982 - Sections 1(3), 2, 4(1), 7(3), 8, 9(1), 20 and 90; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1), 226, 245 to 255; Companies Act; Finance Act, 2002 - Sections 3(5) and 4; Kerala Chittis (Amendment) Act, 2002
AIR2005Ker253; [2005]126CompCas586(Ker); 2005(3)KLT332
constitutional validity of Sub-section 1(a) to Section 4 of the Kerala Chitties Act, 1975 introduced by the Kerala Finance Act, 2002 (Act 7 of 2002) with effect from 1.4.2002 as beyond the legislative competence of the State Legislature … sheet. Sections 21 and 22 provide for the liability of the foreman and his withdrawal from the chitty. Section 23 to 25 deal with non-prized subscribers. Sections 23 and 24 deal with the payment of subscribers by non-prized
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShri Ramlinga Mills Private Ltd. and ors. Vs. Assistant Collector of C ...
Kerala
Mar-01-1982
Customs
Customs Tariff Act, 1975; Finance Act, 1976 - Sections 32(1); Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 2(11), 2(12), 2(13) 2(23), 2(27), 2(28), 7, 12, 15, 15(1) 25, 30, 46, 68 and 111; Indian Tariff Act, 1934 - Sections 2A; Territorial Waters, Continental Shelf, exclusive Economic Zone and other Maritime Zones Act, 1976 - Sections 5; Customs Act, 1878 - Sections 20(2); Constitution of India - Article 246
1989(22)LC36(Kerala); 1983(12)ELT65(Ker)
is subjected to duty under various fiscal measures. The Customs Tariff Act, 1975 (Act 51 of 1975), the Finance Act of 1976 are some of the relevant enactments. The levy is made, assessed and collected under the provisions … collected under the provisions of the aforesaid enactments read with the Customs Act, 1962 (Act 52 of 1962).6. Section 25 of the Customs Act confers power on the Government in public interest to exempt by notifications in … by the Government of India. Notification Nos. 384 and 385 (Customs), dated 23-7-1976 thus exempted the goods from duty of customs leviable under the first
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAssistant Collector of Customs (imports) Vs. Sundaram Textiles
Chennai
Jul-17-1989
Customs
1990(25)ECC392; 1989(25)LC470(Madras); 1989(44)ELT464(Mad)
Customs Tariff Act, 1975, and an auxiliary duty of 20 per cent leviable under Section 32(1) of the finance Act 1976, together with an additional duty leviable under Section 3 of the Customs Tariff Act 1976. However, by … the additional duty leviable thereon under Section 3 of the Act. By an earlier Notification No. 385 dated 23-7-1976, the Central Government had exempted viscose staple fibre from the auxiliary duty of customs leviable under Section 32(C)
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskEssar Steel Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)
Gujarat
Nov-04-2009
Customs
Finance Act, 2007 - Sections 99 and 114; Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 7, 12, 22, 25, 28(1), 30 and 76A to 76N; Sea Customs Act; Special Economic Zones Act, 2005 - Sections 1, 2, 2(1), 3, 3(1), 4, 4(1), 4(2), 4(4), 5, 7, 12, 15(9), 26, 26(1), 26(2), 30, 51, 53, 53(1), 53(2) and 55; Motor Vehicles Act - Sections 38 and 38(1); Taxation Act - Sections 3, 3(1) and 4A; Trade Marks Act - Sections 28; Uttar Pradesh Trade Tax Act, 1948 - Sections 3; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 4 and 4(1); Factories Act, 1948; Sea Customs (Amendment) Act, 1955; Land Customs Act; Indian Aircrafts Act, 1911; Customs Tariff Act, 1975 - Sections 2, 2(15), 2(18), 2(19), 2(20), 2(22), 2(23), 2(25), 2(26), 2(27), 12, 14, 14(1), 17, 18, 46 and 50; Industries (Development and Regulation) Act, 1951; Income
[2010]24STT121
permitted the goods into the zone. By virtue of Section 114(n) read with the 3rd Schedule to the Finance Act, 2007, Heading No. 11 of the Second Schedule - Export Tariff to the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 was … No. 2 had also directed the Development Commissioners of SEZ throughout the country, vide its Circular letter dated 23-5-2008 to allow supply of steel products on submission of bond and bank guarantee. Notifications were issued by the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM. Ethurajan Vs. Assistant Commissioner of
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Madras
Jul-03-1997
Direct Taxation
(1998)65ITD87(Mad.)
the provisions of section 271(1)(c) by the Finance Act, 1964 and the insertion of Explanation 1 by the Finance Act, 1975 the ratio of the said Supreme Court decision as well as Anwar Ali's case will not be applicable.
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Asstt. C.i.T. Vs. National Lamination Industries
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Ahmedabad
Jun-05-2007
Direct Taxation
(2007)109ITD181(Ahd.)
that case was whether the assessee was an industrial company within the meaning of Section 2(8) of the Finance Act, 1975, and that, in answering that question, the High Court had held that raw diamonds and cut and polished … of the Income-tax Act, 1961. In the case Supreme Court in the case of CIT v. Relish Foods 237 ITR 59 (SC), it is held that the processed or frozen shrimps and prawns are commercially regarded as
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »