Advanced Search Results
Union of India (Uoi) Vs. Shri Harbhajan Singh Dhillon
Supreme Court of India
Oct-21-1971
Constitution
Expenditure Tax Act; Bombay Finance Act, 1932 Sections 20, 21 and 22; Gift Tax Act, 1958; Madras Urban Land Tax Act, 1966; Bombay City Civil Court Act, 1948; Gold (Control) Act, 1868; Bombay Finance (Amendment) Act, 1939; Finance Act, 1969 Sections 2, 3, 4, 5, 5(1), 6, 7 and 24; Wealth Tax Act, 1957 - Sections 2 and 3; Federation Act ; Urban Immovable Property Tax Act ; Madras Agriculturists Relief Act, 1938; Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 3, 4, 5 and 7(1); Government of India Act, 1935 91, 92, 99, 100, 100(1) and 104; Gujarat Municipalities Act - Sections 99; Punjab Urban Immovable Property Tax Act, 1940; Bombay Municipal Act, 1888 - Sections 22; Constitution of India - Articles 1, 14, 19, 19(1), 39, 99, 198-A, 217, 223, 231, 245 to 255 and 302-325
AIR1972SC1061a
not include agricultural land, growing crops, grass or standing trees on such land.90. By Section 24 of the Finance Act, 1969, Section 2(e) was amended omitting the non-inclusion of agricultural land for the assessment year commencing from April 1, 1970 … This appeal is from the Judgment of the High Court of Punjab & Haryana in Civil Writ No. 2291 of 1970, which was heard by a Bench of five Judges. Four Judges held that Section 24 of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSirpur Paper Mills Ltd. Vs. Director of Inspection, Customs and Centra ...
Andhra Pradesh
Sep-22-1981
Direct TaxationExcise
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 27, 81, 99(1), 280ZD and 280ZD(6)
1983(12)ELT457(AP); [1982]136ITR120(AP)
20 per cent of the total amount to chargeable on such goods; and...' 19. Section 31 of the Finance Act, 1969, also is in similar terms. Based on the language, learned counsel argued that the special duty contemplated under … II(3) of Item No. 4, Item Nos. 13, 14, 14F, 15, 15A, 15B, 16, 16A, 17, 18A(2), 21, 22, 23 23A(1), 27, 30, 31(1), 33, sub-items (1), (3A) and (4) of Item No. 34 and Item No.
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Gift-tax Vs. C. Muthukumaraswamy Mudaliar
Chennai
Sep-23-1974
Direct Taxation
Gift Tax Act, 1958 - Sections 15(2), 15(4), 17 and 17(1); Gift Tax (Amendment) Act, 1962
[1975]98ITR540(Mad)
April 1, 1969, will be that laid down under the law in force before its amendment by the Finance Act, 1969, namely, 2% of the wealth-tax payable for every month during which there was failure, without reasonable cause, to … June 30, 1962. But the return was actually filed only on October 22, 1963. The Gift-tax Officer completed the gift-tax assessment on March 31, 1964 … Ramanujam, J.1. The following question has been referred to this court under Section 26(1) of the Gift-tax Act, 1958 :'Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
income-tax Officer Vs. Joseph and ors.
Kerala
Jun-01-1971
CompanyDirect Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 18(3D), 18(6) and 51; Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2(22), 2(35), 194, 276 and 276B; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 205(3); Constitution of India - Article 20(1); Income Tax Rules - Rule 30(1); Finance Act 1969
[1972]83ITR362(Ker)
Ettumanoor Motors (P.) Ltd., under Sections 276(d) and 276B of the Income-tax Act, 1961, as amended by the Finance Act, 1969, for non-payment to the credit of the department all the tax collected on the dividend distributed among the … in all these appeals. Complaints were brought against the respondents-office bearers of the Ettumanoor Motors (P.) Ltd., under Sections 276(d) and 276B of the Income-tax Act, 1961, as amended by the Finance Act, 1969, for non-payment to … by the provisions of Chapter XVII-B or under Sub-section (2) of Section 226 .. .. '13. So, to fasten guilt upon the accused the complainant
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskChekka Anasuya Vs. Income-tax Officer
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Hyderabad
May-05-1982
Direct Taxation
(1982)2ITD60(Hyd.)
80C by the Finance Act, 1969, have been elaborated in the following portion of the departmental circular No. 22 dated 17-7-1969 : 43. The Finance Act, 1969, had amended the provisions of Section 80C of the Income-tax … the following passage occurring at page 1181 of Chaturvedi and Pithisaria's Income-tax Law, Second Edition : II. The Finance Act, 1969-Changes made in Section 80C by the Finance Act, 1969, have been elaborated in the following portion of the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Wealth Tax, Amritsar Vs. Suresh Seth Overruled
Supreme Court of India
Apr-07-1981
Direct Taxation
Wealth Tax Act, 1957 - Sections 14, 14(1), 14(2), 14(3), 15, 16, 17, 18, 18(1) and 27(1); Wealth Tax (Amendment) Act, 1964 - Sections 18; Finance Act, 1969; Constitution of India - Articles 20(1) and 136; Indian Mines Act, 1923 - Sections 39; Factories Act, 1948; General Clauses Act - Sections 6
AIR1981SC1106; (1981)21CTR(SC)349; [1981]129ITR328(SC); 1981(1)SCALE729; (1981)2SCC790; [1981]3SCR419; 1981(13)LC555(SC)
to maximum of 50% of the wealth-tax payable under Section 18(1)(a) before its amendments on 1.4.69 by the Finance Act, 1969 : Rs. 115/-(ii) For the period from 1.4.69 to 18.3.71 : Penalty at 1/2% of the net wealth … on or before June 30, 1965. The Wealth-tax Officer completed the assessments for the aforementioned years on March 22, 1971 determining the total wealth at Rs. 1,45,800/- for the assessment year 1964-65 as against the declared wealth
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Wealth-tax Vs. R.D. Chand and
Andhra Pradesh
Jul-30-1976
Direct Taxation
Wealth Tax Act, 1957 - Sections 14(1) and 18(1); Wealth Tax (Amendment) Act, 1964; Finance Act, 1969
[1977]108ITR787(AP)
Once again, the provisions of Section 18 of the Wealth-tax Act. were amended by Section 24 of the Finance Act, 1969, and Clauses (i) and (ii) of the Wealth-tax (Amendment) Act, 1964, were substituted by the following Clauses (i) … return on June 27, 1966, admitting a net wealth of Rs. 6,62,543. The assessment was completed on July 22, 1966, on a net wealth of Rs. 11,30,232. There was a delay of about 60 months in filing
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of Kerala Vs. Attesee (Agro Industrial Trading Corporation)
Supreme Court of India
Oct-27-1988
Sales Tax
Constitution of India - Articles 269, 286, 286(2) and 286(3)
AIR1989SC222; 1989(19)ECC60; 1988(38)ELT720(SC); JT1988(4)SC250; 1988(2)SCALE1597; 1989Supp(1)SCC733; [1988]Supp3SCR601; [1989]72STC1(SC)
sheets, bed-spreads, counter-panes and table cloths, but do not include any such fabricItem 19 was amended by the Finance Act, 1969. After amendment, it reads thus:19. Cotton fabrics'Cotton Fabrics' means all varieties of fabrics manufactured either wholly or partly … artificial silk fabrics as defined in item nos. 19, 20, 21 and 22 respectively of the First Schedule to the Central Excises and Salt Act, … or reference arises for consideration in these appeals arising out of certain assessment to sales tax in Kerala. Section 9 of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963 which came into force on 1.4.1963 granted exemption from
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskD.R. Kohli, Collector of Central Excise and Others Vs. Associated Film ...
Mumbai
Aug-05-1980
Excise
Constitution of India - Article 226; Central Excises Act, 1944; Finance Act, 1969; Cinematograph Act, 1952 - Sections 2, 3, 5, 5(A), 6(A), 7, 7(A) and 8; Cinematograph (Censorship) Rules, 1958 - Rules 22 and 36
1983(12)ELT754(Bom)
mtr. per mtr. otherwise specified-----------------------------------------------------------------This item no. 37 was thereafter substituted by a new Item 37 by the Finance Act, 1969, and it read as follows : 37 CINEMATOGRAPH FILMS :-----------------------------------------------------------------I Unexposed Two paise per metreII Exposed : of … make provisions for the certification of cinematograph films for exhibition and for regulating exhibitions by means of cinematographs. Section 2(dd) defines the word 'film' as a cinematograph film. As defined by Section 2(c), 'cinematograph' includes any apparatus … 29, 1975, passed by Bhatt, J. allowing the respondents' petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.2. The facts which are not in dispute
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Income-tax Vs. A. Yonus Kunju
Kerala
Oct-18-1996
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 69A, 147, 148, 256 and 271(1)
[1997]228ITR147(Ker)
incorrect because Sub-sections (1) and (1A) of Section 217 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, were substituted by the Finance Act, 1969, with effect from 1970 which would obviously mean that the order of the Tribunal in the context is
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »