Advanced Search Results
Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Casino (Pvt.) Ltd.
Kerala
Oct-06-1972
Direct Taxation
Finance Act, 1968 - Sections 2(6)
[1973]91ITR289(Ker)
from raw materials, constitutes ' manufacture or processing of goods ' within the meaning of section2(6)(d) of the Finance Act, 1968, and that the assessee is an ' Industrial company ' within the meaning of the definition contained in … Court in Commissioner of Sales Tax v. Harbilas Rai and Sons, [1968] 21 S.T.C. 17, 20 (S.C.) which appears to be sufficient to cover the … Subramonian Poti, J.1. This is a reference to this court under Section 256(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, arid the question referred to us is :' Whether, on the facts
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHansraj Aggarwal Vs. Addl. Commissioner of Income-tax
Madhya Pradesh
Apr-25-1978
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 142(1), 142(2A), 143(2), 144 and 271(1); Finance Act, 1968
[1979]119ITR688(MP)
filed on April 9, 1968, i.e., after the substitution of new Clause (iii) in Section 271(1)(c), by the Finance Act, 1968, w.e.f. April 1, 1968, the IAC held that penalty had to be computed by reference to the amount … The business income was derived from the receipts at Rs. 39,819 in the railway ballast account and Rs. 21,945 in the coal ash account. For the assessment year 1967-68, during which the assessee discontinued his business and
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of Kerala and ors. Vs. Maharashtra Distilleries Ltd. and ors.
Supreme Court of India
May-06-2005
Excise
Kerala Abkari Act - Sections 6, 7, 11, 12, 14, 17, 18, 18A, 21 and 29; Kerala Abkari Rules; Kerala Sales Tax Act; Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963 - Sections 2, 5, 5(1), 5(2C) and 35; Kerala Finance Act, 2001 - Sections 3A; Kerala Distillery and Warehouse Rules, 1968 - Rules 16(1), 47, 50 and 52; Foreign Liquor Storage in Bond Rules, 1961 - Rules 3, 3(1), 11 and 11(1); Foreign Liquor Rules, 1953 - Rules 3, 13(9) and 14; Cochin Abkari Act - Sections 10, 14, 24, 29 and 29(2); Kerala Abkari Shops (Disposal in Auction) Rules, 1974 - Rule 3(1A); Central Sales Tax Act, 1956; Finance Act, 2001; Constitution of India - Articles 301, 304, 304(1) and 311; Sea Customs Act, 1878 - Sections 20; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 3
AIR2005SC2594; JT2005(5)SC427; (2005)11SCC1; [2005]141STC358(SC)
on 1.4.2001 the State of Kerala amended Section 5(2C) of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act; by the Finance Act of 2001, by adding an explanation which was brought into effect retrospectively from July 1, 1987 which reads … terms and conditions of a licence granted by the Commissioner in that behalf or under the provisions of Section 21;... ..... .....12. Section 14 deals with establishment and control of distilleries. Beverages, warehouses etc. and provides as follows … 1999 in OP Nos. 23008-23903/98, 818, 2255, 2264, 12893, 3283; 7437 and 19686/99 whereby the High Court allowed the writ petitions filed by the respondents/distillers
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Modi Industries Limited, Modinagar and ors. Vs. Commissioner of Income ...
Supreme Court of India
Sep-15-1995
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2(40), 4(1), 4(2), 143, 144, 156, 190, 191, 214, 214(1), 214(1A), 215, 219, 237, 239, 240, 243, 244, 244(1), and 244(1A); Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 18A
(1995)128CTR(SC)361; [1995]216ITR759(SC); JT1995(6)SC549; 1995(5)SCALE362; (1995)6SCC396; [1995]Supp3SCR642
made under Section 141A, the credit shall be given also in such provisional assessment.(The proviso was added by Finance Act, 1968 from April 1, 1968.)42. This section introduces a legal fiction that amount of advance tax paid shall be … B.P. Jeevan Reddy, J.1. A seemingly simple expression, 'regular assessment', occurring in Section 214 of the Income Tax Act has given rise to an endless conflict as to its meaning among the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Commissioner of Income Tax and Another Vs. V.S. Dempo and Co. Pvt. ...
Mumbai
Feb-05-2016
Direct Taxation
amended by the Finance Act, 1963, w.e.f. 1-4-1963, Finance Act, 1964, w.e.f. 1-4-1964, Finance Act, 1965, w.e.f. 1-4-1965, Finance Act, 1968, w.e.f. 1-4-1969, Finance (No. 2) Act, 1971, w.e.f. 1-4-1972, Finance Act, 1984, w.e.f. 1-4-1985 and Direct Tax Laws … 1987, w.e.f. 1-4-1988. (d) Omitted by the Finance Act, 1988, w.e.f. 1-4-1989. 21. A perusal of section 40 reveals that firstly it starts with a … of law for opinion of a larger bench. Q. Whether, while dealing with the allowability of expenditure under section 40(a)(i) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, the status of a person making the expenditure has to be
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHotel and Allied Trades (P.) Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax
Kerala
Feb-15-1996
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 271 and 271(1)
[1996]221ITR619(Ker)
assessment years in question. Section 271(1)(c) read with the Explanation as it stood after the amendment by the Finance Act, 1964, with effect from April 1, 1964, the relevant portion reads as follows :'271. Failure to furnish returns, … and in the circumstances of the case, where more than one return is filed, one before April 1, 1968, and the other after April 1, 1968, and where some income is concealed in both the returns, the … of penalty. That is the effect of the provision.'28. Again at page 21 of the report, the Supreme Court after considering the decision of the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBhawanidas Binani Vs. Commissioner of Wealth-tax
Mumbai
Jun-27-1978
Direct Taxation
Wealth Tax Act, 1957 - Sections 2; Finance Act, 1965 - Sections 68; Income Tax Act, 1961
[1980]124ITR783(Bom)
are understood in the sense as propounded by the Allahabad High Court, they would clearly indicate that the Finance Act, 1968, was prescribing a distinct rate of tax on an item of total income which was already subjected to … 1. In this reference the question referred to us for our opinion by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal under Section 27(1) of the W.T. Act, 1957, is as follows :' Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSmt. Krishna Gupta Vs. Commissioner of Wealth-tax
Punjab and Haryana
Mar-04-1992
Direct Taxation
Finance Act, 1968; Wealth Tax Act, 1957 - Sections 18 and 18(1); Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 271
[1992]198ITR171(P& H)
Acts in respect of the penalty provisions. Under these provisions, as they stood before their amendment by the Finance Act, 1968, the scale of penalty imposable for concealment or understatement of wealth was a minimum amount of 20 per … cent. of the assessed amount under the provision prior to the amendment). 21. In the above-mentioned cases, the taxpayer will be liable to imposition of … Bahri, J. 1. The following question has been referred to this court by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal under Section 27 of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957 :'Whether, on the facts and circumstances of the case, the Income-tax Appellate
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBireswar Sirkar Vs. Collector of Central Excise and ors.
Kolkata
May-15-2002
Excise
Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19, 21 and 226; ;Gold Control Rules - Rule 126(1), 126(1) and 126M; ;Gold Control Act, 1968 - Sections 4, 68 and 78; ;General Clauses Act, 1897 - Section 6; ;Finance Act, 1995; ;Gold Control Ordinance, 1968; ;Defence of India Rules; ;Central Excise Act, 1944
(2003)2CALLT523(HC),2003(162)ELT1170(Cal)
Their nomenclature have been changed, they have now been designated as the Commissioner of Central Excise by the Finance Act of 1995. The Collector of Central Excise and Customs does not exist, which used to be the adjudicating … to the petitioner under the Defence of India Act and the Rules framed thereunder. Thereafter, the Gold Control Act, 1968 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) came into force and all the proceedings which were initiated under the … down that possession of certain quality and quantity of gold is prohibited. Section 4 of the Act lays down that the matter will be adjudicated
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSheo NaraIn Jugdish NaraIn Vs. the State of Uttar Pradesh and anr.
Allahabad
Jan-29-1974
Sales Tax
[1974]33STC488(All)
1939-40 made on the assessee was quashed by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal on the ground that the Indian Finance Act, 1939, was not in force during the assessment year in Chhota Nagpur where the assessee was carrying on … Chandra, J.1. These writ petitions challenge the validity of two assessment orders dated 16th March, 1973, passed under Section 21 of the U.P. Sales Tax Act for the assessment years 1967-68 and 1968-69.2. For the assessment year 1967-68
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »