Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: finance act 1968 section 1 · Page 1 of about 4,685 results (0.077 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jun 19 1974

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Madras Motor and General Insurance Co. ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jun-19-1974

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Finance Act, 1963; Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 99(1); Finance Act, 1968 - Sections 31(3); Companies (Profits) Surtax Act, 1964 - Schedule - Rule 1

Reported in : [1975]99ITR243(Mad)

to the learned counsel now in view of the deletion of the words 'received by it' by the Finance Act, 1968, with retrospective effect. While deleting the provisions of Section 99, Finance Act, 1968, by Section 31(3) omitted the … same assessee but in respect of two different assessment years. The first reference relates to the assessment year 1963-64, and the second relates to the assessment year1964-65. The assessee is a public limited company carrying on business

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 14 1993

Atul Drug House Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jan-14-1993

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2(45), 3, 5, 80A, C, J and U, 81 and 104; Finance Act, 1968 - Sch. I, Part I and Para. F

Reported in : [1995]216ITR584(Bom)

so declared amounted to Rs. 3,90,000. Such excess dividend entailed an additional income-tax under the provisions of the Finance Act, 1968. The Income-tax Officer, however, failed to take note of this fact at the time of the assessment proceedings. … take note of this fact at the time of the assessment proceedings. He thereupon initiated rectification proceedings under section 154 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The assessee resisted the proceedings. The assessee contended that the declaration of … Mrs. Sujata Manohar J.1. For the assessment year 1968-69, the applicant (hereinafter referred to as 'the assessee') declared a total dividend

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 10 2001

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Vijaya Retreaders

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Aug-10-2001

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income-tax Act, 1961 - Sections 10A, 80-I and 256(1); Finance Act, 1968 - Sections 2(6); Central Excise Act; Finance (Amendment) Act, 1973 - Sections 2(7)

Reported in : [2002]253ITR53(Ker)

whether the assessee was entitled to a concessional rate of tax provided to an industrial company by the Finance Act, 1968. 'Industrial company' means a company which is mainly engaged in the business of generation or distribution of electricity … P.K. Balasubramanyan,J.1. This income-tax reference is at the instance of the Revenue under Section 256(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The questions referred to are as follows :'1. Whether, on the facts

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Sep 22 1981

Sirpur Paper Mills Ltd. Vs. Director of Inspection, Customs and Centra ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Sep-22-1981

Subject : Direct TaxationExcise

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 27, 81, 99(1), 280ZD and 280ZD(6)

Reported in : 1983(12)ELT457(AP); [1982]136ITR120(AP)

amount of tax credit to be certified under s. 280ZD of the I.T. Act. Section 39 of the Finance Act, 1968, read : '39. Special duties of excise on certain goods - (1) When goods of the description mentioned

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 10 1991

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Smt. Indramani Devi Singhania

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jan-10-1991

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 24(1)

Reported in : (1991)95CTR(All)26; [1991]189ITR124(All)

of Section 24 of the Act. The assessment years concerned herein are 1969-70, 1970-71 and 1971-72. By the Finance Act, 1968, Clause (iii) of Sub-section (1) of Section 24 of the Act was deleted and certain words were inserted

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 08 1976

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Commercial Laws of India Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Dec-08-1976

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Finance Act, 1968 - Sections 2(6)

Reported in : [1977]107ITR822(Mad)

total income at the rate of 55 per cent, under Paragraph F of the First Schedule to the Finance Act, 1968 ?' The assessee is the printer and publisher of a fortnightly journal known as Sales Tax Cases. The … Sethuraman, J. 1. Under section 256(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, at the instance of the Commissioner of Income-tax, Madras-II, Madras, the Income-tax

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 09 1977

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. India Sea Foods

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Mar-09-1977

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 271(1); Finance Act, 1968

Reported in : [1977]109ITR596(Ker)

impose penalty for these two years. Section 271(1)(c)(iii) of the Income-taxAct, 1961, before it was substituted by the Finance Act, 1968, with effect from April 1, 1968, provided that the penalty imposable shall be a sum which shall not

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 25 1978

Hansraj Aggarwal Vs. Addl. Commissioner of Income-tax

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-25-1978

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 142(1), 142(2A), 143(2), 144 and 271(1); Finance Act, 1968

Reported in : [1979]119ITR688(MP)

filed on April 9, 1968, i.e., after the substitution of new Clause (iii) in Section 271(1)(c), by the Finance Act, 1968, w.e.f. April 1, 1968, the IAC held that penalty had to be computed by reference to the amount

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 07 1986

Hindustan Wire Products Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax, Patiala

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-07-1986

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 33, 33(1)(A), 33(1)(B), 80B(7), 80E, 80I and 80I(1); Finance Act, 1972; Finance Act, 1968

Reported in : AIR1987SC566; (1986)55CTR(SC)183; [1986]161ITR749(SC); 1986(2)SCALE160; (1986)3SCC689; [1986]3SCR478

time being approved in this behalf by the Central Government.The word 'Sixth' was substituted for 'Fifth' by the Finance Act 1968 with effect from April 1, 1969.5. With effect from April 1, 1964 the Fifth Schedule set forth a … 33 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 provides for the grant of development rebate. Prior to April 1, 1968, Section 33(1)(iii)(c)(A) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 provided:(1) In respect of a new ship acquired or new machinery

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 20 1978

The Union of India (Uoi) and ors. Vs. the Elphinstone Spinning and Wea ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jan-20-1978

Subject : ExciseCustom

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 3, 7, 8, 9, 9A and 9(1); Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rules 2, 8(1), 9A, 9A(1), 9A(2), 9A(3), 9A(7), 9A(8) and 9A(9); Provisional collection of Taxes Act, 1931; ;Constitution of India - Article 226; Government of India Act, 1935 - Sections 213; Finance Act, 1968; Finance Act, 1956; Custom Act, 1962 - Sections 3, 12, 12(1), 15 and 25(1); Customs Tariff Act, 1975;Government of India Act, 1935 - Sections 213; Finance Act, 1968; Finance Act, 1956; Custom Act, 1962 - Sections 3, 12, 12(1), 15 and 25(1); Customs Tariff Act, 1975

Reported in : 1978(2)ELT680(Bom)

whether the said item 22B was new head of excise duty created for the first time by the Finance Act of 1968 or was a reclassification of the said Item 19. Rege J. negatived the contention of the … to the relevant provisions of the said Act and the rules as they stood at the material time. Section 2 is the definition section. Clause (d) of that section defines the term 'excisable goods' as meaning goods … 22B of the First Schedule to the Central Excise and Salt Act, 1944 the goods mentioned in Item 7 of Ex. D and Ex. E

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial