Advanced Search Results

Ram Prakash Jalan Vs. Nagaur Urban Co-operative Bank Ltd. and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Service

Acts : Urban Co-operative Banks Employees Services Rules, 1987 - Rules 2, 8(1) and 11; Rajasthan Co-operative Societies Act, 1965 - Sections 75 and 128; Constitution of India - Articles 2, 12, 14, 16, 226

Reported in : RLW2004(3)Raj1540; 2003(4)WLC116

ground that the petitioner is having equally efficacious and alternative remedy in the matter under the provisions of Section 75 and 128 of the Rajasthan Cooperative Societies Act, 1965. Therefore, the present writ petition is not maintainable on … of the respondent - Bank nor the State Government is having substantial finance in the total fair capital of the respondent - Bank. It has … the respondent No. 1 that the respondent - Bank is a Society registered under the Rajasthan Cooperative Societies Act, 1965 (hereinafter referred to as the Act of 1965), but the State Government is not having deep and pervasive

Sanjay Kulshrestha Vs. Rajasthan Scheduled Caste Scheduled Tribe Finan ...

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Service

Acts : Rajasthan Cooperative Societies Act, 1965 - Sections 75; Rajasthan Ministerial Staff Service Rules, 1957 - Rules 24 and 24(2)

Reported in : RLW2006(1)Raj224

July 25, 1992, Thereafter Abdul Wahid submitted application before the Registrar under Section 75 of Rajasthan Cooperative Societies Act, 1965 (for short '1965 Act'). The petitioner filed reply with the averments that since the appointment was made in … of his seniority. The representation was rejected on May 1, 1992 by the Rajasthan Scheduled Caste Scheduled Tribe Finance and Development Corporation (for short 'Corporation') by making provisional seniority list as final. Representation was again submitted on

Kirloskar Brothers Limited and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : CivilConstitution

Acts : Custom Act; Finance Act, 1995 - Sections 11BB, 27A, 28AA and 75; ;Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227

Reported in : 2001(75)ECC250; 2001(5)MPHT519

Matched in: Citation 2001(75)ECC250; 2001(5)MPHT519

Bhawanidas Binani Vs. Commissioner of Wealth-tax

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Wealth Tax Act, 1957 - Sections 2; Finance Act, 1965 - Sections 68; Income Tax Act, 1961

Reported in : [1980]124ITR783(Bom)

and in the circumstances of the case, any part of the tax paid under Section 68 of the Finance Act, 1965, was a ' debt owed ' on the relevant valuation dates within the meaning of Section 2(m) of

Mannalal Soorana Vs. Wealth-tax Officer

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (1983)4ITD131(Delhi)

tax Act. In this case the Voluntary Disclosure was made by the assessee under Section 68 of the Finance Act, 1965. The income concealed in this disclosure was for the assessment years 1959-60 to 1964-65. The income disclosed was

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. India Steamship Co. Ltd.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 33, 43 and 43(1)

Reported in : [1992]196ITR917(Cal)

expenditure, but the intention of the Legislature as contained in Explanation 8 to Section 43(1) inserted by the Finance Act, 1986, is that the benefit of such capitalisation would be denied on and from the assessment year 1974-75.

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Khem Chand Bahadur Chand

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Indian Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 10(2); Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 37(1), 37(2), 37(2A) and 37(2B)

Reported in : [1981]131ITR336(P& H)

similarly compelled to place curbs on indiscriminate business expenditure and that Section 15(5) of the Finance Act of 1965 was enacted in the following terms :'15. (5) For the purposes 'of this section 'business entertainment' means entertainment … designedly on the indiscriminate allowance of such entertainment expenditure. The first of such restrictions was introduced by the Finance Act of 1961 (vide Section 6 of the Finance Act, 1961, with effect from April 1, 1962) in the … recorded as follows, in the ' Notes on clauses ' (see [1970] 75 ITR 73).' Clause 10 seeks to amend Section 37 of the Income-tax

Sri-la-sri Shanmuga Desiga Gnanasambanda Pandarasannadhi Avargal and H ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Trusts and Soieties

Reported in : (1994)2MLJ313

Madras on 16.7.1965. Subsequently Act XVI of 1965 was passed on the lines of the above ordinance. Thereunder, Section 75 of H.R. & C.E. Act was amended by introducing Sections 75(A), 75(B) and 75(C) of the Act. The … Bonus Act would not be eligible for payment of bonus. Thereupon L.I.C. was advised by the Ministry of Finance, Government of India, that no further payment of bonus should be made to its employees without getting the

Jeewanlal (1929) Ltd. Vs. Income-tax Officer, J-ward and anr.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Section 154; ;Finance Act, 1965 - Section 2(5)

Reported in : [1979]118ITR946(Cal)

at the rate applicable to priority income it is necessary to refer to the relevant provisions of the Finance Act, 1965. Section 2(5)(a)(i) proceeds as follows : 'In respect of any assessment for the assessment year commencing on the 1st

The Buckingham and Carnatic Company Ltd. and ors. Vs. the State of Mad ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Other TaxesConstitution

Reported in : (1966)2MLJ172

the assets of individuals may single out one of the assets for an additional levy as under the Finance Act, 1965; but that does not detract from the point. These observations relating to Entry 86 clearly bring out the … of which was ' a rate on buildings or lands or both situate within the municipal borough '. Section 75 prescribed the procedure to be followed preliminary to imposing any tax under Section 73. The section also used