Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: finance act 1965 section 37 · Page 1 of about 1,336 results (0.135 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jan 29 1976

Commissioner of Income-tax, Gujarat I Vs. Ahmedabad Manufacturing and ...

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Jan-29-1976

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 30, 34, 37, 40, 147 and 148; Finance Act, 1965

Reported in : [1977]106ITR159(Guj)

purpose of taxation. He further held that rebate under clause 1(b)(ii) of Paragraph F of Schedule I of Finance Act, 1965, had been wrongly allowed at the rate of 35 per cent. in the original assessment order but on … was taken into use or not, then no deduction on account of such tax could be given under section 37 of the Act. This decision of the Allahabad High Court had been brought to the notice of the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 01 1967

Kalawati Devi Harlalka Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax, West Bengal and ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : May-01-1967

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Indian Income-tax Act 1922 - Sections 18A, 23, 23A, 25, 25A, 29, 31, 33, 33B, 34, 35, 44, 60(1), 131 to 136, 140 to 146, 147, 148, 149, 150, 153, 156 to 158, 185, 187 to 189, 282 to 284 and 288; Constitution of India - Article 226; Income-tax Act, 1961 - Sections 297, 297(1), 297(2) and 298; General Clauses Act - Sections 6; Income-tax (Removal of Difficulties) Order, 1962; Finance Act, 1950 - Sections 3, 11, 12, 13 and 13(1); Payment of Bonus Act, 1965 - Sections 37

Reported in : AIR1968SC162; [1967]66ITR680(SC); [1967]3SCR833

cover the validity of the section itself. Furthermore, the terms of s. 37 of the Payment of Bonus Act, 1965 are different and the Bonus Act is not a taxing law. 27. In the result the appeal fails … 'Now the question is in what sence has the work 'assessment' been used in section 13(1) of the Finance Act, 1950. Two circumstances may be noticed at once. The long title says that the Finance Act, 1950, is

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 05 1982

income-tax Appellate Tribunal Vs. B. Hill and Co. (P.) Ltd.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Mar-05-1982

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Finance Act, 1965 - Sections 2(5); Finance Act, 1966 - Sections 2(5); Finance Act, 1967 - Sections 2(4); Finance Act, 1964; Finance Act, 1968; Finance Act, 1969; Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2(18), 31, 37, 108 and 256

Reported in : (1982)29CTR(All)301; [1983]142ITR185(All)

of goods by the assessee and accordingly not entitled to tax concession provided under Section 2(5)(a)(i) of the Finance Act, 1965 (2) Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal is right … facts found, an expenditure in its true character and nature is business expenditure it can be allowed under Section 37 of the Act of 1961 (which corresponds to Section 10(2)(xv)) even though it may have been originally claimed

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jun 04 1981

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Khem Chand Bahadur Chand

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jun-04-1981

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Indian Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 10(2); Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 37(1), 37(2), 37(2A) and 37(2B)

Reported in : [1981]131ITR336(P& H)

indiscriminate business expenditure and that Section 15(5) of the Finance Act of 1965 was enacted in the following terms :'15. (5) For the purposes 'of … designedly on the indiscriminate allowance of such entertainment expenditure. The first of such restrictions was introduced by the Finance Act of 1961 (vide Section 6 of the Finance Act, 1961, with effect from April 1, 1962) in the … the phrase 'in the nature of entertainment expenditure' designedly employed by the Legislature in Sub-sections (2) and (2A)of Section 37 of the I.T. Act, 1961, is the somewhat ticklish question which has necessitated this reference to the Full

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 18 1985

C.J. Patel and Co. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Jun-18-1985

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 37(1), 38, 39, 40, 57 and 80V

Reported in : (1986)51CTR(Guj)52; [1986]158ITR486(Guj)

the business of the firm since the assessee was under an obligation, on making a disclosure under the Finance Act, 1965 (No. 10 of 1965), to make payment within a period not exceeding six months. Secondly, it was entailed … whether a particular item of expense qualifies itself to be admissible for purposes of computation of profit under section 37 depends on whether the expenses have been wholly and exclusively laid out for the purposes of business. It

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 26 2014

M/s. Bharti Airtel Ltd. Vs. The Commissioner of Central Excise

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-26-2014

Subject : Service Tax

amount of Rs.2,04,39,093/- under provisions of Rule 14 of the Credit Rules read with Section 73 of the Finance Act,1994. In respect of towers and parts thereof, prefabricated building, printers and office chairs, the Commissioner observed that the … (e) M/s. J.K. Cotton Spinning and Weaving Mills Co. Ltd. Vs. Sales Tax Officer, Kanpur and Anr., (AIR 1965 SC 1310); (f) CCE Vs. Jay Engineering Works Ltd., (1989(39) ELT 169 (S.C.) (g) Indus Towers Ltd. Vs. … Steel Tubes (P) Ltd) versus Collector of C. Ex., ((1995) 2 SCC 372) (III) Triveni Engineering and Industries Ltd and Anr Versus Comm. Of C.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 12 1992

Mangalam Cement Ltd. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Jaipur

Decided on : Feb-12-1992

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (1992)43ITD292(JP.)

High Court In Patel Bros. & Co. Ltd. 's case (supra) at page 438 reference is made to Finance Act, 1965 passed by the British Parliament wherein Sub-section (8) had been added to Section 15 of the Finance Act, … the entire amount of Rs. 2,78,896.58 in respect of presentation items be not disallowed fully in terms of Section 37(2A) treating it as an expenditure in the nature of entertainment observing that it was a clear case of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 05 2016

The Commissioner of Income Tax and Another Vs. V.S. Dempo and Co. Pvt. ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-05-2016

Subject : Direct Taxation

w.e.f. 1-4-1989. Earlier, it was amended by the Finance Act, 1963, w.e.f. 1-4-1963, Finance Act, 1964, w.e.f. 1-4-1964, Finance Act, 1965, w.e.f. 1-4-1965, Finance Act, 1968, w.e.f. 1-4-1969, Finance (No. 2) Act, 1971, w.e.f. 1-4-1972, Finance Act, 1984, w.e.f. … 35E deals with deduction for expenditure on prospecting etc. for certain minerals. Section 36 deals with other deductions. Section 37 deals with general expenditure and not being expenditure of the nature described in sections 30 to 36 and

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 06 1999

Zunjarrao Bhikaji Nagarkar Vs. U.O.i. and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-06-1999

Subject : Service

Acts : Central Civil Services(Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1965 - Rule 14; Central Excise Act, 1944; Finance Act, 1995 Sections 11-A, 33, 35B and 37; Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rules 9, 49, 52A, 53, 173G,Q and 226; Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 129, 139, 142, 143(1), 144A, 148 and 271; CCS(Conduct) Rules, 1964 - Rule 3(1); Orissa Sales Tax Act, 1947 - Sections 7, 11, 12(5) and 25(1); Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 63 and 325; Drug and Cosmetics Act, 1940 - Sections 18, 27 and 34; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 7, Rule 11; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 482; Constitution of India - Article 14 and 19

Reported in : AIR1999SC2881; 1999(66)ECC40; 1999LC29(SC); 1999(112)ELT772(SC); JT1999(5)SC366; (2000)ILLJ728SC; 1999(4)SCALE480; (1999)7SCC409; [1999]Supp1SCR87; 2000(1)SLJ291(SC)

is now called Commissioner after amendment of the Central Excise Act, 1944 (for short the 'Act') by the Finance Act of 1995. Presently the appellant is posted as Director, National Academy of Customs, Excise and Narcotics, Mumbai. He … Rule 14 of the Central Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1965 informing him that the President proposes to hold an inquiry against him … this section, the duty as reduced or increased, as the case may be, shall be taken into account.15. Section 37 of the Act empowers the Central Government to make rules carrying into effect the purposes of the Act.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 06 1991

Sri Madhusudan Mills Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on : Mar-06-1991

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (1993)LC218Tri(Delhi)

case, the Supreme Court held that the Special Excise Duty which was levied under Section 80 of the Finance Act, 1965 cannot be regarded as having been levied under the Excise Act. In the judgment reported in 1986 (25) … 20-2-1982. The text of this Notification is as follows : - In exercise of the powers conferred by section 37 of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 (1 of 1944), the Central Government hereby makes the following

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial