Advanced Search Results

Jamnaprasad Kanhaiyalal Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax, M.P., Bhopal

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 68, 139, 256 and 257; Voluntary Disclosures of Income and Wealth Act, 1976 - Sections 18; Indian Income Tax Act, 1922; Finance Act, 1965 - Sections 24, 24(1), 24(3), 24(6) and 24(8)

Reported in : AIR1981SC1759; (1981)23CTR(SC)146; [1981]130ITR244(SC); (1981)3SCC441; [1981]3SCR849

Tax shall be entitled to his costs of the reference. Direct Taxation - disclosure - Section 24 of Finance Act, 1965, Section 68 of Income Tax Act, 1961 and Section 18 of Voluntary Disclosures Of Income and Wealth Act, 1976

Commissioner of Wealth Tax, Amritsar Vs. Suresh Seth Overruled

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Wealth Tax Act, 1957 - Sections 14, 14(1), 14(2), 14(3), 15, 16, 17, 18, 18(1) and 27(1); Wealth Tax (Amendment) Act, 1964 - Sections 18; Finance Act, 1969; Constitution of India - Articles 20(1) and 136; Indian Mines Act, 1923 - Sections 39; Factories Act, 1948; General Clauses Act - Sections 6

Reported in : AIR1981SC1106; (1981)21CTR(SC)349; [1981]129ITR328(SC); 1981(1)SCALE729; (1981)2SCC790; [1981]3SCR419; 1981(13)LC555(SC)

to maximum of 50% of the wealth-tax payable under Section 18(1)(a) before its amendments on 1.4.69 by the Finance Act, 1969 : Rs. 115/-(ii) For the period from 1.4.69 to 18.3.71 : Penalty at 1/2% of the net … department on the assessee under Section 18(1)(a) of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957, for the assessment years 1964-65 and 1965-66 respectively ?3. The assessee, the respondent in these appeals filed his wealth-tax returns for the assessment years 1964-65

Commissioner of Wealth-tax Vs. Smt. V. Pathummabi

Court : Kerala

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Wealth Tax Act, 1957 - Sections 18(1); Wealth Tax (Amendment) Act, 1964; Finance Act, 1969

Reported in : [1977]108ITR689(Ker)

is, under Section 18(1)(i) of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957, as it stood prior to its amendment by the Finance Act, 1969 ?'2. The returns for the two years 1964-65 and 1965-66 should have been filed by the assessee

State of Karnataka and ors. Vs. Thirumala Distilleries

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Excise

Acts : Karnataka Excise Act, 1965 - Sections 16(3), 22, 23, 36 and 45; Karnataka Excise (Distillery and Warehouse) Rules, 1967 - Rules 24, 25, 26 and 34; Karnataka Excise (Excise Duties and Fees) Rules, 1968 - Rule 2; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 3, 4, 17 and 114; Constitution of India

Reported in : 2004(6)KarLJ194

99, replacing earlier legislation). Further it was pointed out that the capital gains tax legislation (starting with the Finance Act, 1965) does not contain any provision corresponding to Section 460. The intention should be deduced, therefore, it was said, … the warehouse, which are under the joint lock and key of the Distillery Officer and the distiller. Rule 18 of the said rules provide that the Government shall not be responsible for the destruction or loss or

Commissioner of Wealth-tax Vs. R.D. Chand and

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Wealth Tax Act, 1957 - Sections 14(1) and 18(1); Wealth Tax (Amendment) Act, 1964; Finance Act, 1969

Reported in : [1977]108ITR787(AP)

Once again, the provisions of Section 18 of the Wealth-tax Act. were amended by Section 24 of the Finance Act, 1969, and Clauses (i) and (ii) of the Wealth-tax (Amendment) Act, 1964, were substituted by the following Clauses … levied a penalty of Rs. 4,650 under Section 18(1)(a) of the Act as it stood on April 1, 1965.5. The legal representative appealed to the Appellate Assistant Commissioner who did not accept the plea put forth on

Mcdowell and Co. Ltd. Vs. Commercial Tax Officer

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Direct TaxationSales Tax

Reported in : AIR1986SC649; (1985)2CompLJ137(SC); (1985)47CTR(SC)126; 1985(5)ECC259; [1985]154ITR148(SC); 1985(1)SCALE788; (1985)3SCC230b; [1985]3SCR791; [1985]59STC277(SC); 1986(1)LC595

99, replacing earlier legislation). Further it was pointed out that the capital gains tax legislation (starting with the Finance Act 1965) does not contain any provision corresponding to Section 460. The intention should be deduced, therefore, it was said, … A.B. Abdul Kadir v. State of Kerala : [1976]2SCR690 , this Court restated the position thus (at p. 189):Excise duty, it is now well settled, is a tax on articles produced or manufactured in the taxing country.

Balkrishna Binani Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2(45), 3 and 4; Wealth Tax Act, 1957 - Sections 2

Reported in : (1979)9CTR(Bom)62; [1980]121ITR442(Bom)

facts and in the circumstances of the case any part of the tax paid u/s 68 of the Finance Act, 1965, was a 'debt owed' on the relevant valuation dates within the meaning of s. 2(m) of the Wealth-tax … no such liability for payment of tax on the concerned valuation dates as the liability under the charging section of the Income-tax Acts could only be attracted if the income disclosed could be said to have formed … 1965-66 under consideration in this reference, all on the same day, namely, 18th January 1966. The WTO however, did not allow as a deduction any

income-tax Appellate Tribunal Vs. B. Hill and Co. (P.) Ltd.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Finance Act, 1965 - Sections 2(5); Finance Act, 1966 - Sections 2(5); Finance Act, 1967 - Sections 2(4); Finance Act, 1964; Finance Act, 1968; Finance Act, 1969; Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2(18), 31, 37, 108 and 256

Reported in : (1982)29CTR(All)301; [1983]142ITR185(All)

of goods by the assessee and accordingly not entitled to tax concession provided under Section 2(5)(a)(i) of the Finance Act, 1965 (2) Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal is right … For the assessment year 1964-65 profit on the sale of wool and wool tops and dyes was Rs. 18,84,498, whereas the loss in the export of carpets was Rs. 15,01,586.7. The net profit of the company in

M/s. Bharti Airtel Ltd. Vs. The Commissioner of Central Excise

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Service Tax

amount of Rs.2,04,39,093/- under provisions of Rule 14 of the Credit Rules read with Section 73 of the Finance Act,1994. In respect of towers and parts thereof, prefabricated building, printers and office chairs, the Commissioner observed that the … (e) M/s. J.K. Cotton Spinning and Weaving Mills Co. Ltd. Vs. Sales Tax Officer, Kanpur and Anr., (AIR 1965 SC 1310); (f) CCE Vs. Jay Engineering Works Ltd., (1989(39) ELT 169 (S.C.) (g) Indus Towers Ltd. Vs. … Excise Appeal no.116 of 2010 before this Court. By an order dated 18.11.2010 passed by this Court while admitting the appeal filed by the appellant,

Mannalal Soorana Vs. Wealth-tax Officer

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (1983)4ITD131(Delhi)

tax Act. In this case the Voluntary Disclosure was made by the assessee under Section 68 of the Finance Act, 1965. The income concealed in this disclosure was for the assessment years 1959-60 to 1964-65. The income disclosed was … 1980. By this order, the order(s) of the Commissioner (Appeals) was sustained upholding the penalties levied under Section 18(1)(c) of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957 ('the Act'), for each of the three assessment years. The assessee has now