Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: finance act 1961 section 1 · Page 1 of about 12,491 results (0.145 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

May 09 2008

American Hotel and Lodging Association Educational Institute Vs. Centr ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : May-09-2008

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Finance Act, 1998; Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 10(20A), 10(22), 10(22B), 10(23C), 11, 11(1), 11(5), 12, 12AA, 13, 60 to 63 and 245Q(1); Finance Act, 2001; Finance Act, 2002; Finance Act, 2007; Central Boards of Revenue Act, 1963; Income Tax Rules, 1962 - Rule 2CA

Reported in : (2008)216CTR(SC)377; [2008]301ITR86(SC); JT2008(6)SC379; 2008(7)SCALE588; (2008)10SCC509; 2008AIRSCW4996

scope of enquiry by the Prescribed Authority under Section 10(23C)(vi) read with the third proviso thereto inserted by Finance Act, 1998 w.e.f. 1.4.1999. In this case, Central Board of Direct Taxes ('CBDT') being the Prescribed Authority, at the … on the following questions:(i) Whether the applicant would be entitled to exemption wider Section 10(22) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, in respect of its various amounts of income from the following sources in India:(a) Conducting various courses and

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 04 2008

Commissioner of Income Tax, Bangalore Vs. Infosys Technologies Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jan-04-2008

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 17(1), 17(2) and 192; Finance Act, 1999; Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1956 - Sections 2; Fourth Schedule Rules - Rules 6, 11(2) and 11(4)

Reported in : 2008BusLR235(SC); (2008)214CTR(SC)293; [2008]297ITR167(SC); JT2008(1)SC225; 2008(1)SCALE92; (2008)2SCC272

do not find merit in the contention advanced on behalf of the Department that Section 17(2)(iiia) inserted by Finance Act, 1999 w.e.f. 1.4.2000 was clarificatory and, therefore, retrospective in nature.11. We quote hereinbelow Section 17(2)(iiia), which reads as … the employee for participating in the scheme was not a 'perquisite' under Section 17(2)(iii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ('1961 Act'). This decision of the Tribunal stood confirmed by the impugned judgment delivered by the Karnataka High

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 25 1985

Lohia Machines Ltd. and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jan-25-1985

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2, 2(8), 2(33), 5, 11, 28 to 43A, 43(6), 80A to 80VV, 84, 84(1), 295(1), 295(2) and 296; Finance Act, 1980 - Sections 15C, 80H, 80I, 80J, 80J(1), 80J(2), 80J(3), 84 and 84(1); Income Tax Rules, 1962 - Rule 19, 19A, 19A(2) to (4), 19A(5), 19(1), 19(1A), 19(3) and 19(6); Indian Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 15C(1), 15C(2), 51C and 59(1); Taxation Laws (Amendment) Ordinance, 1949; Indian Income tax (Computation of Capital of Industrial undertakings) Rules, 1949 - Rule 3 and 3(1); Business Profits Tax Act, 1947 - Sections 13; Taxation Laws (Extension to Merged States and Amendment) Act, 1949 - Sections 13, 15C, 15C(1), 15C(2), 15C(4), 15C(6) and 34(2); Finance (Amendment) Act, 1976 - Sections 29; Finance (Amendment) Act, 1967; State Financial Corporati

Reported in : AIR1985SC421; (1985)1CompLJ249(SC); (1985)44CTR(SC)328; [1985]152ITR308(SC); 1985(1)SCALE115; (1985)2SCC197; [1985]2SCR686; [1985] 1 SCR 192

Rules 1962 which have been framed by virtue of the authority conferred under Section 295 of the Income-tax Act 1961. Section 295 lays down: (1). The Board may subject to the control of the Central Government, by notification in … computed in accordance with the provisions of the Second Schedule" and the Second Schedule after its amendment by Finance Act 66 of 1976 does not provide for inclusion of borrowed monies and debts in computation of the capital

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jan 07 2008

Commissioner of Income Central Ii Vs. Suresh N. Gupta

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jan-07-2008

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2, 4, 4(1), 32, 32(2), 68, 69, 69A, 69B, 69C, 112, 113, 115A, 115AB, 115AC, 115ACA, 115AD, 115B, 115BB, 115BBA, 115E, 115JB, 132, 132A, 132B, 139, 139(1), 142, 142(1), 143, 143(1B), 143(2), 143(3), 144, 147, 148, 158B, 158BA, 158BA(1), 158BA(2), 158BB, 158BB(1), 158BC, 158BH, 161, 161(1A), 164, 164A, 167B, 245D and 245D(4); Finance Act, 2001 - Sections 2(1), 2(2) and 2(3); Finance Act, 2002 - Sections 113; Finance Act, 1995; Constitution of India - Articles 269, 270 and 271

Reported in : (2008)214CTR(SC)274; [2008]297ITR322(SC); JT2008(1)SC208; 2008(1)SCALE99; (2008)4SCC362; 2008AIRSCW1066

appeal.Points for determination:4. Two points arise for determination: Whether on the facts and circumstances of this case, the Finance Act, 2001 ('FA' for short) was applicable to 'block assessment' under Chapter XIV-B in respect of the search carried … in imposing surcharge at 17% on the tax amount of Rs. 97,456/- under Section 113 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 ('1961 Act') for the 'block period' comprising of previous years relevant to 10 assessment years, i.e., 1991-92 to … J.1. Leave granted.2. Whether the AO had erred in imposing surcharge at 17% on the tax amount of Rs. 97,456/- under Section 113 of the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 21 2008

Agricultural Produce Market Committee, Narela, Delhi Vs. Commissioner ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-21-2008

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2(1), 10, 10(20), 10(26AAB) and 260A; Finance Act, 2002; Cantonments Act, 1924 - Sections 3; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 3(31); Delhi Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation) Act, 1998 - Sections 5, 22(1), 22(2), 62 65, 88, 88(1), 88(2) and 88(3); Delhi Development Act, 1957; Payment of Bonus Act, 1965 - Sections 32; Constitution of India (Seventy-third Amendment) Act, 1992; Constitution of India (Seventy-fourth Amendment) Act, 1992; Constitution of India - Articles 243, 243P, 243 and 243ZF

Reported in : (2008)218CTR(SC)433; [2008]305ITR1(SC); JT2008(10)SC17; 2008(11)SCALE540; (2008)9SCC434; 2008AIRSCW6285; 2008(6)Supreme520; 2008(11)SCALE540

were enjoying exemption from income tax under Section 10(20) of the 1961 Act prior to its amendment by Finance Act, 2002 w.e.f. 1.4.03.10. Prior to the amendment by Finance Act, 2002, Section 10(20) of the Income-tax Act, 1961

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 18 1969

JaIn Bros. and ors. Vs. the Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Nov-18-1969

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 2(2), 3, 22, 22(2), 23, 23(5) and 26A; Finance Act, 1956 - Sections 14, 14(1), 14(2), 14(3), 14(4) and 23(5); Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 271, 271(1), 271(2), 274, 274(1), 275, 276 and 297(2); General Clauses Act - Sections 3(42); Payment of Bonus Act, 1965 - Sections 33

Reported in : AIR1970SC778; [1970]77ITR107(SC); (1969)3SCC311; [1970]3SCR253

Act, 1956, Sections 271, 271 (1) and (2), 274, 274 (1), 275, 276 and 297 (2) of Income-tax Act, 1961, Section 3 (24) of General Clauses Act and Section 33 of Payment of Bonus Act, 1965 - notice under … computing the total income of the firm at Rs. 4,75,368. In view of the amendment made by the Finance Act of 1956 in Section 23(5) of the Act of 1922 the tax payable by the firm as also

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 02 1974

Commissioner of Wealth-tax Vs. Girdhari Lal

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-02-1974

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Finance Act, 1965 - Sections 68, 68(1) and 68(3); Wealth Tax Act, 1957 - Sections 2; Income Tax Act, 1961; Income Tax Act, 1922

Reported in : [1975]99ITR79(Delhi)

assessed of the income-tax paid by the firm on the amounts disclosed voluntarily under Section 68 of the Finance Act, 1965, is a debt under Section 2(m) of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957, on the dates of valuation for … the 1st day of March, 1965, under the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922 (11 of 1922), or the income-tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961), or (b) which has escaped assessment for any assessment year for which an assessment has … as ' the Tribunal ') under Section 27(1) of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957 (hereinafter called ' the Act '):' Whether, on the facts and in

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 08 1981

Jamnaprasad Kanhaiyalal Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax, M.P., Bhopal

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : May-08-1981

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 68, 139, 256 and 257; Voluntary Disclosures of Income and Wealth Act, 1976 - Sections 18; Indian Income Tax Act, 1922; Finance Act, 1965 - Sections 24, 24(1), 24(3), 24(6) and 24(8)

Reported in : AIR1981SC1759; (1981)23CTR(SC)146; [1981]130ITR244(SC); (1981)3SCC441; [1981]3SCR849

declarant is a company, at the rates specified in Paragraph F,of Part I of First Schedule to the Finance Act (X of 1965) as if such amount were the total income of the declarantSub-section (8) on which strong … costs of the reference.A.P. Sen, J.3. This is a direct reference under Section 257 of, the Income Tax Act, 1961 made by the Income Tax Appellate (Tribunal, Jabalpur, for short, The Appellate Tribunal), at the instance of the … 1. I agree. The acceptance of a disclosure statement made by a declarant

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 14 1993

Atul Drug House Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jan-14-1993

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2(45), 3, 5, 80A, C, J and U, 81 and 104; Finance Act, 1968 - Sch. I, Part I and Para. F

Reported in : [1995]216ITR584(Bom)

so declared amounted to Rs. 3,90,000. Such excess dividend entailed an additional income-tax under the provisions of the Finance Act, 1968. The Income-tax Officer, however, failed to take note of this fact at the time of the assessment … at the time of the assessment proceedings. He thereupon initiated rectification proceedings under section 154 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The assessee resisted the proceedings. The assessee contended that the declaration of dividend of Rs. 6,90,000 was out … Mrs. Sujata Manohar J.1. For the assessment year 1968-69, the applicant (hereinafter referred to as 'the assessee') declared a total dividend

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 28 1976

Rambhai Jethabhai Patel Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax, Gujarat-i

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Jun-28-1976

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2(30), 2(46), 6(6), 24(7), 113, 113(1), 113(3), 113(4), 113(5), 143, 146, 147, 155, 155(1) and 263; Finance Act, 1965

Reported in : [1977]108ITR771(Guj)

enacted, section 113 took the place of section 17, sub-section (1), of the Act of 1922. By the Finance Act, 1965, section 113 was deleted from the Act with effect from April 1, 1965, and section 2, sub-section … that the Income-tax Officer had made this mistake, he applied for rectification under section 154 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The assessment order was passed by the Income-tax Officer on December 16, 1965. Thereafter on November 11, 1966,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial