Advanced Search Results
Gujarat Beedi Karkhana Owners' Association and Ors. Vs. Union of India ...
Gujarat
Oct-15-1970
Labour and Industrial
Maternity Benefit Act 1961 - Sections 2; Workmen's Compensation Act 1928 - Sections 12; Factories Act 1948 - Sections 1(2), 3, 38(1), 38(2) and 85; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2
(1971)GLR690; (1972)ILLJ253Guj
High Court of Patna in Ram Chandra Prasad v. State of Bihar, A.I.R. 1957 Pat. 247, that the Factories Act, 1948, would cover these establishments in which beedi making was carried on because the expression 'employed' in S. 2(1) … relevant provisions of the Act to consider the entire scheme. (a) The provisions regarding health and welfare : Sections 8 to 16 deal with the provisions regarding health and welfare and along with the relevant Rules 10
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNarra Koteswara Rao Vs. Appellate Authority Under Payment of Gratuity ...
Andhra Pradesh
Sep-29-2000
Labour and Industrial
Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 - Sections 2, 4 & 7(4); Constitution of India - Article 226; A.P. Payment of Gratuity Rules - Rule 10(1); Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 408, 420, 468 and 471; A.P. Shops and Establishments Act, 1988 - Sections (10) & 2(5); Factories Act, 1948 - Sections 2; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 1(3), 2 & 3
2001(1)ALD66; 2000(6)ALT320; [2002(94)FLR698]; (2001)ILLJ685AP
2(g) reads as follows:'Factory' has the meaning assigned to it in clause (m) of Section 2 of the Factories Act, 1948.'Section 2(m) of the Factories Act reads asfollows:'factory' means any premises including the precincts thereof--(i) whereon ten or more … by the State against the petitioner in the Court of IV Metropolitan Magistrate, Vijayawada for offences punishable under Sections 408, 420, 468 and 471 IPC and the same is pending for trial. He further stated that both … records and quash the order dated 28-2-2000 made in PGA No.5 of 1999 on the file of the first respondent by declaring as illegal arbitrary
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskUday Shankar Bhat Vs. Union of India and ors.
Karnataka
Oct-04-2001
Civil
Karnataka Panchayat Raj Act, 1993 - Sections 2(13), 66 and 321; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 226 and 227; Factories Act, 1948 - Sections 2; Mines Act, 1952; Punjab Cinemas (Regulations) Act, 1952
ILR2002KAR2056; 2002(1)KarLJ190
Section 2(13) of the Karnataka Panchayat Raj Act, 1993 (the Act' for short) and Section 2(m) of the Factories Act, 1948 and also to the definition of the term 'manufacturing process' as contained in Section 2(k) of the Act, … and impugned circular issued cannot be characterized as illegal, arbitrary, unjust and contrary to provisions of Act. - Sections 13(1)(d), 13(2) & 19: [Ram Mohan Reddy,J] Offence under - Order of Sanction - Cognizance of the offence
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
State Vs. Ardeshir Hormusji Bhiwandiwala
Mumbai
Oct-10-1955
Labour and Industrial
Factories Act, 1948 - Sections 2, 6, 7, 17, 34, 35, 44, 51, 52, 53, 54, 59, 67, 69, 79, 92, 106 and 112; Bombay Factories Act, 1947; Bombay Factories Rules, 1950 - Rules 3 and 4; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908; Factories Act, 1911 - Sections 2 and 2(3); Factories (Amendment) Act, 1954; Mines Act, 1952; Public Health Act, 1875 - Sections 4; Workmen's Compensation Act, 1925
AIR1956Bom219; (1956)58BOMLR66; 1956CriLJ488; ILR1956Bom321; (1956)IILLJ26Bom
this offence and sentence him topay a fine of Rs. 25/-. 20. Judgment reversed. Factories Act (LXIII of 1948), Sections 2(m) and (k)(i), 7(1)(bb) -- Bombay Factories Rules, 1950, Rules 3 and 4, Forms Nos. 1 and 2 … Chief Presidency Magistrate, Bombay, acquitting the respondent who was charged with having committed an offence under Section 92, Factories Act 1948, for breach of the provisions of Section 6, Factories Act, 1948, read with Rule 4 of the Bombay
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskS.G. Chemicals and Dyes Trading Employees' Union Vs. S.G. Chemicals an ...
Supreme Court of India
Apr-03-1986
Labour and Industrial
Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 - Sections 28; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 18, 25-K, 25-O and 25-T; Constitution of India - Articles 136, 226 and 227; Labour Practices Act, 1971 - Sections 25-O(1)
[1986(52)FLR661]; 1986LabIC863; (1986)ILLJ490SC; 1986(1)SCALE1048; (1986)2SCC624; [1986]2SCR126; 1986(3)SLJ29(SC)
(Bombay Act No. 79 of 1948) while the establishment at Trombay was a factory as defined in the Factories Act, 1948 (Act No. 63 of 1948), and, therefore, these were two separate legal entities governed by the provisions of … Industrial Disputes (Amendment) Act, 1976 (Act No. 32 of 1976), with effect from March 5, 1976, and contains Sections 25K or 25S. Section 25-O as originally enacted was substituted by Section 14 of the Industrial Disputes (Amendment) … Court, Maharashtra dismissing a complaint filed by the Appellant Union under Section 28 of the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour … Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 (Maharashtra Act No.l of 1972) complaining of an unfair labour practice on
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHaldia Refinery Canteen Employees Union and ors. Vs. Indian Oil Corpor ...
Supreme Court of India
Apr-29-2005
Labour and IndustrialConstitution
Indian Factories Act, 1948 - Sections 2(1) and 46; Factories Rules; Constitution of India - Article 16(4)
AIR2005SC2412; 2005(5)ALLMR(SC)922; (SCSuppl)2005(3)CHN164; [2005(105)FLR1051]; JT2005(5)SC62; (2005)IILLJ684SC; (2005)5SCC51; 2005(2)SLJ440(SC); 2005(2)LC891(SC)
that the factory of the respondent where the workmen are employed is governed by the provisions of Indian Factories Act 1948 (for short 'the Factories Act') and the canteen where the said workman are employed is a statutory canteen … this appeal and dismiss the same with no orders as to costs. Labour and Industrial - 'workman' - Sections 2(1) and 46 of Indian Factories Act, 1948 and Factories Rules - whether appellants working in statutory canteen
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Tamil Nadu Labour Welfare Board Rep. by Its Secretary Vs. Council ...
Chennai
Jul-06-2009
Labour and Industrial
Tamil Nadu Labour Welfare Fund Act, 1972 - Sections 2; Factories Act, 1948 - Sections 2 and 85(2); Societies Registration Act, 1860; Motor Transport Workers Act, 1961 - Sections 2; Plantations Labour Act, 1951 - Sections 2; Tamil Nadu Catering Establishments Act, 1958 - Sections 2(1); Tamil Nadu Societies Registration Act, 1975; Tamil Nadu Labour Welfare Fund (Amendment) Act, 1982 - Sections 2; Constitution of India - Article 12
(2010)ILLJ88Mad
Adyar, Madras, being a place deemed to be a factory under Sub-section 2 of Section 85 of the Factories Act, 1948 and being a factory as defined in Clause (m) of Section 2 of the Factories Act, 1948, is … respondent Leather Research Institute, Adyar, Madras, being a place deemed to be a factory under Sub-section 2 of Section 85 of the Factories Act, 1948 and being a factory as defined in Clause (m) of Section 2 … against the order of the learned Judge dated 3.12.1999 in W.P.No.13340 of 1988.2. By the said order, the learned Judge, presumed that the Council of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState Vs. Shankar Balaji Waje
Mumbai
Oct-09-1959
Labour and IndustrialCriminal
Factories Act, 1948 - Sections 2(1), 79 and 80
(1959)61BOMLR1676; 1960CriLJ896; (1961)IILLJ8Bom
owner of the establishment and will not fall within the definition of `worker' in S. 2(1) of the Factories Act, 1948,' Learned counsel for the accused has also relie on certain observations in the case of : 1958CriLJ803 recently … of work and no fixed daily wage in case of such worker S. 79 can have no operation. Sections 79 and 80 read together make it abundantly clear that wages for period of leave are payable to
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPrema Vs. Thangappan
Karnataka
Nov-09-1996
Labour and Industrial
Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 - Sections 2(1); Factories Act, 1948 - Sections 2
ILR1997KAR401; (1999)IIILLJ454Kant
or within the precincts whereof a manufacturing process as defined in Clause (k) of Section 2 of the Factories Act, 1948, is being carried on, .............................and mechanical power or electrical power is used.10. In the Saw Mill of the … Workmen's Compensation Act.5a. The Commissioner has held that the appellant was not a workman within the definition of Section 2(1)(n) of the Workmen's Compensation Act. The Commissioner, therefore, dismissed the claim of the appellant for compensation.6. The
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAndhra Pradesh State Electricity Employees Union and anr. Vs. Commissi ...
Andhra Pradesh
Jul-21-1995
Labour and Industrial
Factories Act, 1948 - Sections 2(1) and 62; Andhra Pradesh Factories Rules - Rule 103; Industrial Disputes Act - Sections 2(1)
1995(2)ALT666; [1996]85CompCas625a(AP); (1996)ILLJ939AP
furnish a copy of the order to the learned Government Pleader forthwith. Labour and Industrial - interpretation - Sections 2 (1) and 62 of Factories Act, 1948, Rule 103 of Andhra Pradesh Factories Rules and Section 2 (1) of … all the members of the petitioner Union satisfy the definition of 'worker' as defined under Section 2(1) of Factories Act, 1948 and therefore, the names of all those members are required to be included in the muster roll as
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »