Advanced Search Results

Kanhaiya Lal Bansal Vs. State of Jharkhand and anr.

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Factories Act, 1948 - Sections 9, 21, 92, 95 and 96A; Bihar Factories Rule, 1950 - Rules 13, 102 and 139; Companies Act, 1956; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 482

Reported in : [2006(3)JCR436(Jhr)]

has taken cognizance as against the petitioner and two others for the offence under Section 92 of the Factories Act, 1948. Further prayer has been made to set aside all the proceedings consequent thereto, now pending in the Court … taking cognizance dated 24th February, 2001 in F.A. No. 251 of 2001, whereby cognizance of the offence under Section 96A of the Factories Act was taken against them. They also challenged the entire criminal proceeding, pending against them.

Dr K Raviprakash vs Union of India Rep by

Court : Karnataka

event of sickness, maternity and employment injury to workmen employed in or in connection with the work in factories other than seasonal factories.A scheme of this nature has to be planned on an all-India basis and administered … HOMES / CLINICS IN THE MATTER OF AVILAING MEDICAL RELIEF/HELP/TREATMENT TO THE EMPLOYEES OF THE INSURED UNDER ESI ACT 1948 AS AMENDED FROM TIME TO TIME AND TO DISPENSE AND DISCONTINUE WITH THE PROCEDURE FOLLOWED BY RESPONDENT NOS.1 … INSURANCE BUSINESS ACT, 1972 AND FURTHER PLEASE TO STRIKE DOWN PROVISIONS OF SECTION 57 AND 59 OF ESI ACT, 1948 AS BEING UNREASONABLE, OPPRESSIVE AND … of any medical treatment, as may be provided by the regulations. Regulation 96A and 96 B of the Employees State Insurance (General) Regulations, 1950 details