Advanced Search Results

Hector Hoshang Mehta and ors. Vs. Marol Nand Dham Udyog Premises Co-op ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Property

Acts : Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947 - Sections 6(1); Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 106, 111, 114 and 114-A; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 20, Rule 12

Reported in : 2002(2)BomCR67

evidence is produced before the Court to prove this fact. I am not shown any provision under the Factories Act, 1948 or the Rules framed thereunder by the State Government which require the factory owners to insure the premises … of the Transfer of Property Act.14. Shri Merchant, the learned Advocate for the defendants however, pressed into service section 114 of the Transfer of Property Act, which gives the lessee a relief against forfeiture for non-payment of rent.

Yawalkar Pesticides Pvt .Ltd. Vs. Nagpur Municipal Corporation and anr ...

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956.; Municipal Corporation Act, 1948. - Section 114 (3) (1), 387

Civic Authority for the City of Nagpur is a body constituted under the City of Nagpur Municipal Corporation Act, 1948. Under section 114 of the said Act, it is entitled to impose taxes and collect cess in accordance

Sitaram Ramcharan and ors. Vs. M.N. Nagrashna and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Payment of Wages Act, 1936 - Sections 15, 15(2), 15(3) and 17; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 47, 115 and 244; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Limitation Act, 1908 - Sections 5 and 14; Factories Act - Sections 50, 51 and 54; Shops and Establishments Act, 1948 - Sections 70; Conveyancing Act, 1881; Transfer of Property Act - Sections 114; Workmen's Compensation Act

Reported in : AIR1954Bom537; (1954)56BOMLR930; ILR1954Bom1389; (1954)IILLJ703Bom

Factories Act the petitioners would not have satisfied the definition of 'worker', but Section 70, Shops and Establishments Act, 1948, extended the operation of the Factories Act and made the Factories Act applicable to persons working in the … to 30-6-1953; The basis of the claim was that the lights of these employees were governed by the Factories Act and under the provisions of the Factories Act, inasmuch as they had worked more than eight hours a … Court applied this observation also to a case of relief against forfeiture which in India is governed by Section 114, Transfer of Property Act. Turning to Section 114, Transfer of Property Act, and referring only to the relevant

Murali Mohanan.K. vs Inspector of Factories and Boilders Gr.I

Court : Kerala

Rule 115(3) and Rule 114 of the Kerala Factories Rules and Section 62(1) r/w. Section 92 of the Factories Act,1948 and sentenced to pay a fine of Rs.10,000/- in each count (total amount of Rs.30,000/-) and in default

Narsayya Sayanna Kunden Vs. Joint Regional Director, Esic, Pune

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 - Sections 1(4), (5), 2(9) and 82(2)

Reported in : [1995(70)FLR5]; (1999)IIILLJ440Bom

No. 6 of 1978. By the said application, the appellant herein had prayed for a declaration that the factories of the appellants referred to in the application were not covered by and under the Employee's State Insurance … by the said Order, the appellants had preferred this appeal under Section 82(2) of the Employee's State Insurance Act, 1948. Section 82(2) of the said Act provides that 'an appeal shall lie to the High Court from an order

The State of Mysore Vs. K. Srinivasa Upadya

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Labour and IndustrialCriminal

Acts : Factories Act, 1948 - Sections 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 18, 42, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 61, 62, 63, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 85, 85(1), 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 117 and 118; Madras Factories Rules

Reported in : AIR1961Kant169; AIR1961Mys169; [1961(3)FLR332]; (1962)IILLJ267Kant

judgment.2. The Inspector of Factories at Mangalore laid two complaints against the respondent under Section 92 of the Factories Act, 1948. It is alleged that the premises known as 'Siddartha Printers' is an establishment that had been notified under

Govindrao Atmaramji Warjurkar and anr. Vs. the State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 1, Rule 1

Reported in : AIR1976Bom383; 1977MhLJ320

the issuance of the notices under the Bye-laws framed under the provisions of the City of Nagpur Corporation Act, 1948. In that petition it was contended that the provisions of Section 114(i) of the said Act were unconstitutional

Kajaria Ceramics Limited Vs. Trade Tax Tribunal and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Trade Tax Act, 1948 - Sections 4A and 4A(5)

Reported in : [2000]119STC117(All)

notification included making sweetmeats, namkin, reori, gazak (but excluding such confectionery manufacturing units as are registered under the Factories Act, 1948) and restaurant. While arguing before the honourable Supreme Court that sweetmeats does not include confectionery items like toffee … Supreme Court in Commissioner of Sales Tax v. Industrial Coal Enterprises [1999] 114 STC 365 ; 1999 UPTC 250.16. In the first case of Pappu … 26, 1985, the State of Uttar Pradesh issued Notification No. ST-II-7558/X-9(208)-1981-U.P. Act 15/48-Order-85, dated December 26, 1985, Under Section 4-A of the then existing U.P. Sales Tax Act with a view to promote development of certain industries

Indian Young Lawyers Association Vs. The State of Kerala

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Education

whether the Petitioner’s salt works could be included within the definition of ‘factory’ in Section 2(m) of the Factories Act, 1948. Section 2(m) defines ‘factory’ as “any premises including the precincts thereof”. This Court rejected the appellant’s claim that the … Gidla, Ants among Elephants: An Untouchable Family and the Making of Modern India, Harper Collins (2017), at page 114 101 Diane Coffey and Dean Spears, Where India Goes: Abandoned Toilets, Stunted Development and the Costs of Caste,

Vasantha R. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Factories Act, 1948 - Sections 66(1); Constitution of India - Articles 14, 15(1) and 19(1)

Reported in : (2001)IILLJ843Mad

a factory can employ female workers up to 10-00 P.M. after getting exemption under Section 66(1)(b) of the Factories Act, 1948. Section 66(1)(b) of the Factories Act is to protect the weaker section from exploitation rather than decreasing employment opportunity … general welfare in a democratic society.' The concept of equality and equal protection of law guaranteed by Article 114 of the Constitution in its proper spectrum encompasses social and economic justice in a political democracy as its