Advanced Search Results

Grand Kakatiya Sheraton Hotel and Towers Employees and Workers Union V ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Andhra Pradesh Shops and Establishments Act, 1988 - Sections 16(3), 47, 47(3) and 47(4), 47(5), 50 and 51; Companies Act; Andhra Pradesh Shops and Establishments Act, 1966 - Sections 40, 40(1) and 40(3); Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 - Sections 1(3), 2, 3A, 4(1), 7, 7(1), 7(2) and 7(3); Factories Act, 1948 - Sections 2(5), 2(8), 2(10) and 2(11); Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 25F; Orissa Administrative Service, Class II (Appointment of Officers Validation) (Amendment) Act, 1992 - Sections 2; Constitution of India - Articles 13, 14 and 19(1), 254(2) and 309

Reported in : AIR2009SC2337; [2009(121)FLR407]; JT2009(4)SC550; (2009)IIILLJ161SC; 2009(3)SCALE371; (2009)5SCC342:2009AIRSCW3149:2009(5)LHSC3456

co-operative society, an establishment of a factory or an industrial undertaking which falls outside the scope of the Factories Act, 1948 (Central Act 63 of 1948), and such other establishment as the Government may, by notification, declare to be … V.S. Sirpurkar, J.1. This appeal is directed against the judgment and order passed by the High Court, whereby, Sections 47(3) and 47(4) of the Andhra Pradesh Shops & Establishments Act, 1988 (hereinafter referred to as `the Shops

Chhotabhai Purushottam Patel and ors. Vs. the State of Maharashtra by ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908; Beedi and Cigar Workers (Conditions of Employment) Act, 1966 - Sections 1, 2, 3, 4, 4(1), 4(3), 4(4), 4(5), 4(6), 4(7), 4(8), 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 21(3), 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 26(1), 27, 27(1), 28, 29(1), 29(2), 31, 31(1), 31(2), 31(3), 33, 39(2), 40, 41, 42 and 44; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19, 19(1) and 246; Industrial Employment Standing Orders Act, 1946 - Sections 2, 2(1), 2-A, 37(1), 37(2), 61, 71, 63, 85 and 85(1); Beedi and Cigar Workers (Conditions of Employement) Rules, 1968 - Rules 34, 36, 37, 37(1) and 37(2); Minimum Wages Act; Factories Act, 1948 - Sections 79, 79(11), 80, 80(1), 85, 92 and 101; Bombay Industrial Relations Act, 1946; Central Provinces and Berar Regulation of Manufacture of

Reported in : AIR1971Bom244; 1971LabIC1080; 1971MhLJ413

the Manager of a factory was prosecuted for violation of Section 79(11) read with Section 92 of the Factories Act, 1948. The trial Court convicted him but in the revision application filed in the Court of Session the Sessions

Vijay Kumar Singh and ors. and Krishna Kamal Prasad @ Krishna Kant Pra ...

Court : Patna

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Factories Act, 1948 - Sections 2, 6, 7, 92, 105, 106 and 119; Bihar Factory Rule, 1950 - Rules 3, 3A, 4, 5 and 11; Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957; Mines Act, 1952 - Sections 2; Bihar Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1972 - Rules 9 and 21

and prayed before the learned court below to take cognizance under Sections 105, 106 and 119 of the Factories Act, 1948, for violation of the provisions of Section 6 read with Section 7 of the Factories Act and under … verifying any fact and prayed before the learned court below to take cognizance under Sections 105, 106 and 119 of the Factories Act, 1948, for violation of the provisions of Section 6 read with Section 7 of

Ferro Alloys Corporation Ltd., Vizianagaram Vs. Government of A.P. and ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Factories Act, 1948 - Sections 46; Andhra Pradesh Factories Rules - Rules 65 and 70; Contract Labour (Abolition and Regulation) Act, 1970 - Sections 2(1), 4 and 10; Constitution of India - Articles 19(1), 226 and 227; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947

Reported in : 1999(6)ALD550

Labour Abolition Act') abolishing the contract labour in all operation of canteens required to be provided under the Factories Act, 1948. In WP No. 15707 of 1989, G.O. Ms. No.287, dated 7-5-1981, issued by the Government of Andhra Pradesh … have challenged the validity of G.O. Ms. No.11, dated 12-2-1990, issued by the Government of Andhra Pradesh under Section 10 of the Contract Labour (Abolition and Regulation) Act, 1970 (hereinafter referred to as 'Contract Labour Abolition Act')

Kay Kay Embroideries Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Cloth Markets and Shops Board and o ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Maharashtra Mathadi, Hamal and Other Manual Workers (Regulation of Employment and Welfare) Act, 1969 - Sections 2, 2(3), 2(4), 2(9), 2(11), 2(12), 3, 3(1), 3(2), 4, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 25F and 170B; Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2; Factories Act, 1948; Employees State Insurance Act, 1948; Minimum Wages Act, 1948; Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952; Payment of Bonus Act, 1965; Maharashtra Factories Rules, 1963; Bombay Shops and Establishments Act, 1923; Security Guards Act; Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923; Payment of Wages Act, 1936; Maternity Benefit Act, 1961; Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972; Employees Provident Funds and Family Pension Act, 1952; Contract Labour (Regulation and Abo

Reported in : 2006(6)ALLMR5; 2006(6)BomCR739; [2007(112)FLR273]; (2007)ILLJ865Bom; 2006(6)MhLj377

labour legislation like : (1) Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946, (2) Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, (3) The Factories Act, 1948, (4) The Employees State Insurance Act, 1948, (5) Minimum Wages Act, 1948, (6) The Employees' Provident Funds and … judgment of this Court in Century Textiles and Industries Ltd., v. State of Maharashtra : (2000)IILLJ815Bom relating to Section 2 definitions defining the words 'unprotected workers' (section 2(11) and 'worker' (section 2(12) of the Mathadi Act, 1969

Employees State Insurance Corporation Vs. S.K. Aggarwal and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Labour and IndustrialCriminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 401 and 482; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 405 and 406; Employees State Insurance Act, 1948 - Sections 2(17), 11, 40 and 85B; Employees State Insurance (Amendment) Act, 1975; Factories Act, 1948 - Sections 100

Reported in : 1998VAD(SC)588; AIR1998SC2676; 1998(2)ALD(Cri)322; 1998(4)ALLMR(SC)389; 1998(2)ALT(Cri)316; [1998]94CompCas75(SC); 1998CriLJ4027; JT1998(5)SC233; (1998)IILLJ794SC; 1999(1)M

of a factory is defined in Section 2(15) as having the same meaning assigned to it in the Factories Act, 1948. Section 2(n) of the Factories Act, 1948 as it stood at the relevant time, defined an 'Occupier' to mean … if he commits a default in the payment of such contribution to the Employees' State Insurance Fund. Under Section 11 of the Indian Penal Code the word 'person' includes any company or association or body of person whether

Tradesvel Security Services Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Service

Reported in : (1982)84BOMLR608

Sub-section (5) defines factory to mean a factory as defined in Clause (m) of Section 2 of the Factories Act, 1948. Sub-section (8) defines principal employer to mean an employer who has engaged Security Guards through an agency or … casual leave of 12 days. Out of the said 50 agents again, 6 were giving privilege leave between 11 to 15 days while one was giving between 16 and 20 days and 19 were giving over 20

Rai Bahadur Diwan Badri Das Vs. the Industrial Tribunal, Punjab

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Indian Factories Act, 1948 - Sections 79; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 10(1); Constitution of India - Article 19

Reported in : AIR1963SC630; [1962(5)FLR354]; (1962)IILLJ366SC; [1963]3SCR930

category of workmen, the new Rule made the following provision : 'Subject to the provisions of the Indian Factories Act, 1948, every workman in the service of the Tribune on the 1st July, 1956, will be entitled to 30 … dearness allowance payable in January every year if he had worked for 11 Months. In addition, the said press worker was entitled to Quarantine leave … their employees into two categories (1) the Lino-operations and (2) the rest of the workmen in the Press Section; and Rule 57 made provision for leave on the basis of the said classification. The effect of the

Madhu Fantasy Land Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai and anr. Vs. Maharashtra General ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2, 18 and 25L; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 11; Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1972; Factories Act, 1948 - Sections 2K and 2(12); Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971

Reported in : 2002(4)BomCR692; [2002(95)FLR245]; (2002)IIILLJ587Bom; 2002(3)MhLj534

is necessary for running the Rides and games in good repair. This being a factory as defined under Factories Act, 1948, the Park would be an industrial establishment governed by the provisions of 25-L of the Industrial Disputes Act … paid on 7th of the next month, as usual.3. On 8-7-1994, a notice of closure was issued under Section 25-FFA of the Industrial Disputes Act. All the workers, according to the petitioners, were members of respondent No.

Mr Ravindra Pisharody and Anr Vs. The State of Jharkhand and Anr

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Land Acquisition

the Court of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jamshedpur whereupon cognizance as aforesaid under Section 92 of the Factories Act, 1948 has been taken against the petitioners 2 alleging petitioner No.1 as Occupier and petitioner No.2 as Manager of