Advanced Search Results

Yatindra Kumar Aggarwal and Another Vs. Union of India and Another

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

that is whether the considerations which are required to be taken into account under Section 31(1)(d) of the Extradition Act, 1962 are to be examined by the Central Government prior to the issuance of an order of Magisterial Inquiry … (Habeas Corpus Petition No. 1243/2005 decided on 26.04.2006). Mr Amit Bansal submitted that the Central Government, in para 9 of its counter-affidavit, has clearly stated that the offence for which extradition has been sought is different from

Himanshu Kulshrestha Vs. Union of India and Another

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

that is whether the considerations which are required to be taken into account under Section 31(1)(d) of the Extradition Act, 1962 are to be examined by the Central Government prior to the issuance of an order of Magisterial Inquiry … (Habeas Corpus Petition No. 1243/2005 decided on 26.04.2006). Mr Amit Bansal submitted that the Central Government, in para 9 of its counter-affidavit, has clearly stated that the offence for which extradition has been sought is different from

Brij Bhushan Bansal Vs. Union of India and Another

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

that is whether the considerations which are required to be taken into account under Section 31(1)(d) of the Extradition Act, 1962 are to be examined by the Central Government prior to the issuance of an order of Magisterial Inquiry … (Habeas Corpus Petition No. 1243/2005 decided on 26.04.2006). Mr Amit Bansal submitted that the Central Government, in para 9 of its counter-affidavit, has clearly stated that the offence for which extradition has been sought is different from

Salwant Singh Sandhu Vs. State of Delhi and Others

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 439; Extradition Act, 1962 - Sections 4, 5, 6, 9, 25, 34, 41(1) and 43(2); Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 420

Reported in : 2001IVAD(Delhi)576; 2001CriLJ3030; 91(2001)DLT577; 2001(59)DRJ116

the Code of Criminal Procedure (hereinafter referred to as 'the Code' only) read with Section 25 of the Extradition Act, 1962 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act' only) is for grant of bail to the petitioner arrested under Section … the petitioner could be arrested only after obtaining warrants of arrest from the Magistrate under Section 6 or Section 9 of the Act. He also argues that even provisional warrants of arrest could be obtained under Section 34(b)

Bansil Mutei Shiblaq Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Extradition Act, 1962 - Sections 4, 5, 7, 7(3), 7(4), 9, 34B, 34B(1), 34B(2), 34B(3) and 34(2); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 397; Constitution of India - Article 21

Reported in : 2007(96)DRJ120

the Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate (ACMM) dated 21-3-2007, rejecting his application for discharge under Section 34-B(2) of the Extradition Act, 1962 (hereafter 'the Act').2. The facts necessary to decide the petition are that the petitioner, a UK national, professes … of the Act; the second eventuality under which arrest of a fugitive criminal can be made is under Section 9 of the Act when it appears to any Magistrate that a person within the local limits of his

In Re: State of Kerala and ors.

Court : Kerala

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Extradition Act, 1962 - Sections 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 9(1) and 25; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 438; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 1996CriLJ160

Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvananthapuram granted granted bail in the purported exercise of powers envisaged in Section 9 of the Extradition Act, 1962 (for short 'the Act'). Section 2(f) of the Act defines a fugitive criminal as 'an individual who is

Abu Salem Abdul Qayoom Ansari Vs. State of Maharashtra and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 - Sections 3(2)(i), 3(2)(ii), 3(3), 3(5), 5, 19; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 120B, 302, 307, 387, 382; Constitution of India - Article 32

Blast Case No. 1 of 1993, as violative of the Rule of Speciality and Section 21 of the Extradition Act, 1962; (d) issue a writ of Mandamus to release and discharge the writ petitioner by quashing all the proceedings … country and he can be tried only for the offences mentioned in the extradition decree.2) Criminal Appeal No. 990 of 2006, filed under Section 19 of the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 (hereinafter referred to

Verhoeven, Marie-Emmanuelle Vs. Union of India Through Ministry of Ext ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Right to Information

dated 24.02.2015 of the Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Patiala House Courts, New Delhi under Section 34-B of the Extradition Act, 1962. Thereafter, accepting the extradition request dated 24.03.2015 made by the Republic of Chile, by order dated 18.05.2015 the … (International Arrangements) Order, 1947 which was issued in exercise of the powers conferred upon the Governor General by Section 9 of the Indian Independence Act, 1947. The agreement set out in the Schedule to the above said Order

Niranjan Patel Vs. Uoi

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

passed by the learned Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate-01, Patiala House Courts, New Delhi under Section 5 of the Extradition Act, 1962 in CC. No.79/1/08 whereby the learned Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate recommended extradition of the Petitioner to the United … USA was in breach of mandatory provisions of the Indo-US Extradition Treaty (in short „the Treaty‟), especially Article 9(4)(a) of the said Treaty which provides that the request for extradition relating to a person, who has been

Verhoeven, Marie-Emmanuelle Vs. Union of India and Ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Right to Information

order is purported to have been issued in exercise of powers conferred by Section 4(1) of the Indian Extradition Act, 1962. Section 4(1) has no relevance to the context. What is relevant is Section 3(1) of the Act. The third … notified by the Secretariat of the Governor-General (Reforms) on 14th August, 1947 in exercise of powers conferred by Section 9 of the Indian Independence Act, 1947. The Order has the effect of an agreement duly made between the