Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: extradition act 1962 section 8 · Page 1 of about 124 results (0.029 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Dec 27 1988

M. Baskaran Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Dec-27-1988

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 41(8) and 439; Extradition Act, 1962 - Sections 25

Reported in : 37(1989)DLT298

amounted to rejection of bail. Even otherwise, he could move the High Court under Section 25 of the Extradition Act, 1962 (hereinafter referred to as 'Extradition Act') after the rejection of the bail by the Magistrate as Magistrate has … any written statement which the fugitive criminal may desire to submit for the consideration of the Central Government. Section 8 provides for that if the Central Government forms an opinion that the fugitive criminal ought to be surrendered

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 22 1995

In Re: State of Kerala and ors.

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Jun-22-1995

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Extradition Act, 1962 - Sections 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 9(1) and 25; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 438; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 1996CriLJ160

Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvananthapuram granted granted bail in the purported exercise of powers envisaged in Section 9 of the Extradition Act, 1962 (for short 'the Act'). Section 2(f) of the Act defines a fugitive criminal as 'an individual who is … fugitive criminal to prison and he has to report the result of the enquiry to the Central Government. Section 8 deals with the surrender of the fugitive criminal to the commonwealth country. There can be no doubt that

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 07 2009

Bhavesh Jayanti Lakhani Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-07-2009

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Extradition Act, 1962 - Sections 2, 3, 5, 6, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 29 and 34B; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 41, 41(1), 105A to 105L and 154; Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946 - Sections 3, 5; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) (Amendment) Act, 1993; Foreigners Act; Delhi Special Police Ordinance, 1946; Police Act, 1861; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 13 and 44A; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 363, 363A, 365 and 368; Punjab Police Rules; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19, 21, 32, 73 and 226; Madhya Pradesh Police Regulations

Reported in : 2009(5)LHSC2857; JT2009(11)SC279; 2009(11)SCALE467; (2009)9SCC551; 2009AIRSCW6309

there shall be no order as to costs. - Interpol Notice: [S.B. Sinha & Dr. Mukundakam Sharma, JJ] Extradition Act, 1962, Section 6, 16, 34-B and 15 - Matrimonial Dispute - Whether the CBI established under the DPSE Act has … 20th May, 2005 which was extended till 24th May, 2005.iv) Although the appellant appeared before the Court on 8th July, 2005 he neither sought any modification of the order nor the custody of the child.v) Appellant having

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Sep 12 2008

Ram K. Mahbubani Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Sep-12-2008

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Extradition Act, 1962 - Sections 2, 3, 3(3), 4 to 11, 5, 6, 12 to 18, 24, 34, 34B and 1343; Extradition Act, 1870; Fugitive Offenders Act, 1881; Extradition Act, 1903; Bare Act; Extradition (Amendment) Act, 1993 - Sections 8; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 228; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 415, 417 and 420; Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908

Reported in : 153(2008)DLT471; 2008(106)DRJ906

issuance of a writ of Habeas Corpus securing the release of the Petitioner under Section 24 of the Extradition Act, 1962 ('Extradition Act' for short); secondly, for quashing of the Orders of the learned ACMM dated 31.5.2007 and 28.7.2007 … the Extradition Act in the AIR . is not accurate. This would be evident from a perusal of Section 8 of Act 66 of 1993 since the amendments are not restricted to Section 11 but span the entire

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 27 2012

State Through the Idol Wing Crime Investigation Department. Vs. Subash ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Apr-27-2012

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code(IPC) 1860 - Section Sections 457, 380; Code of Criminal Procedure(CrPC) - Section 437, 70(2), 482, 446A, 173(8); Extradition Act, 1962 - Section 29

appropriate to cancel the Non Bailable Warrant when the extradition proceeding is in progress. Section 29 of the Extradition Act, 1962 reads thus:-29. Power of Central Government to discharge any fugitive criminal -. If it appears to the Central

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 01 2008

Kamlesh Babulal Aggarwal Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-01-2008

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Extradition Act, 1962 - Sections 5, 7, 7(3), 7(4), 8, 10 and 17; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 228

Reported in : 2008(104)DRJ78

the order dated 30.10.2002 of the Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, New Delhi (ACMM) under Section 7 of the Extradition Act, 1962 (hereinafter called as the Act). The ACMM held that there existed a prima facie case in support of … of the Act within two weeks and directed the Central Government to pass an order in terms of Section 8 of the Act. It was further ordered that the order, if any, passed by the Central Government under

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 21 2015

Verhoeven, Marie-Emmanuelle Vs. Union of India Through Ministry of Ext ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Sep-21-2015

Subject : Right to Information

thereto as well as the Extradition Acts, 1870 to 1932 and the Fugitive Offenders Act, 1881 stood repealed. 8. A careful analysis of the provisions of the Extradition Act, 1962 (for short the Act') shows that it … dated 24.02.2015 of the Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Patiala House Courts, New Delhi under Section 34-B of the Extradition Act, 1962. Thereafter, accepting the extradition request dated 24.03.2015 made by the Republic of Chile, by order dated 18.05.2015 the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 21 2012

Yatindra Kumar Aggarwal and Another Vs. Union of India and Another

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Dec-21-2012

Subject : Education

that is whether the considerations which are required to be taken into account under Section 31(1)(d) of the Extradition Act, 1962 are to be examined by the Central Government prior to the issuance of an order of Magisterial Inquiry … an order of Magisterial Inquiry passed under Section 5 thereof or at the stage of consideration indicated in Section 8 of the said Act 2. On 29.01.2010, a note verbale was issued by the Embassy of the United

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 21 2012

Himanshu Kulshrestha Vs. Union of India and Another

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Dec-21-2012

Subject : Education

that is whether the considerations which are required to be taken into account under Section 31(1)(d) of the Extradition Act, 1962 are to be examined by the Central Government prior to the issuance of an order of Magisterial Inquiry … an order of Magisterial Inquiry passed under Section 5 thereof or at the stage of consideration indicated in Section 8 of the said Act 2. On 29.01.2010, a note verbale was issued by the Embassy of the United

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 09 2017

Omesh Chander Kashyap vs.union of India

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Aug-09-2017

Subject : Land Acquisition

Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate vide order dated 31.03.2015, after a full fledged enquiry under Section 7 of the Extradition Act, 1962 (hereinafter called as „Act‟) recommended for the extradition of the petitioner to Canada, the requesting State. The W.P(Crl.) … inquiry report under Section 7 of the Act or the decision of the Central Government in terms of Section 8 of the Act.12. In order to appreciate the contentions of the parties i.e. the petitioner and the Central

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial