Advanced Search Results

Jugal Kishore More Vs. Chief Presidency Magistrate Calcutta and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 46, 75 to 86, 186 to 189, 403, 429, 439, 514 and 555; ;Constitution of India - Articles 21, 73, 227 and 394; ;Extradition Act, 1962 - Sections 2, 3(1), 19, 35 and 37; ;Fugitive Offenders Act, 1881 - Sections 13 and 26; ;General Clauses Act, 1897 - Section 3; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 3, 4, 120B, 216, 420, 467 and 471

Reported in : AIR1968Cal220,1968CriLJ604,71CWN508

strongly contended by Mr. Dutt in the very fact that after the Supreme Court decision and beforeenactment of Extradition Act, 1962, instructions were given' as above. But his Lordship finds 'an incorrectitude' in instruction (b) just reproduced, which, to … or Section 12'; (ii) Section 36 conferring on the Central Government the power to make rules; and (iii) Section 37 repealing, among others, the Extradition Act 15 of 1903 and the Fugitive Offenders Act 1881 'dead' already by

Yatindra Kumar Aggarwal and Another Vs. Union of India and Another

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

that is whether the considerations which are required to be taken into account under Section 31(1)(d) of the Extradition Act, 1962 are to be examined by the Central Government prior to the issuance of an order of Magisterial Inquiry

Himanshu Kulshrestha Vs. Union of India and Another

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

that is whether the considerations which are required to be taken into account under Section 31(1)(d) of the Extradition Act, 1962 are to be examined by the Central Government prior to the issuance of an order of Magisterial Inquiry

Brij Bhushan Bansal Vs. Union of India and Another

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

that is whether the considerations which are required to be taken into account under Section 31(1)(d) of the Extradition Act, 1962 are to be examined by the Central Government prior to the issuance of an order of Magisterial Inquiry

Verhoeven, Marie-Emmanuelle Vs. Union of India Through Ministry of Ext ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Right to Information

Extradition Act, 1962 has been enacted and the said Act has come into force with effect from 05.01.1963. Section 37 of the Extradition Act, 1962 declare that the Indian Extradition Act, 1903 and any law corresponding thereto as … dated 24.02.2015 of the Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Patiala House Courts, New Delhi under Section 34-B of the Extradition Act, 1962. Thereafter, accepting the extradition request dated 24.03.2015 made by the Republic of Chile, by order dated 18.05.2015 the

Niranjan Patel Vs. Uoi

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

passed by the learned Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate-01, Patiala House Courts, New Delhi under Section 5 of the Extradition Act, 1962 in CC. No.79/1/08 whereby the learned Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate recommended extradition of the Petitioner to the United … is an extraditable offence. The Petitioner has been convicted and sentenced to undergo imprisonment for a period of 37 months for offences relating to visa frauds. The offences relating to visa frauds cannot fall in the category

Ram K. Mahbubani Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Extradition Act, 1962 - Sections 2, 3, 3(3), 4 to 11, 5, 6, 12 to 18, 24, 34, 34B and 1343; Extradition Act, 1870; Fugitive Offenders Act, 1881; Extradition Act, 1903; Bare Act; Extradition (Amendment) Act, 1993 - Sections 8; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 228; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 415, 417 and 420; Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908

Reported in : 153(2008)DLT471; 2008(106)DRJ906

issuance of a writ of Habeas Corpus securing the release of the Petitioner under Section 24 of the Extradition Act, 1962 ('Extradition Act' for short); secondly, for quashing of the Orders of the learned ACMM dated 31.5.2007 and 28.7.2007 … offences.2. Whereas the Government of the United States of America has submitted a formal request on 10.10.2006 (at) 37-39, through diplomatic channels, for the extradition of the said fugitive to the United States of America; and3. Whereas

Kanwarjeet Singh Batth vs Union of India

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

by Amritsar Police, the Petitioner was sent to judicial custody on 22.10.2014.8. As per Section 34(b)(2) of the Extradition Act, 1962 any fugitivearrested under sub-section (1), is entitled to be discharged if no request for his Surrender or Return … my opinion death resulted from: la. Haemorrhage 1b. Stab wound to the abdomen. Signed By:VIKAS W.P.(CRL.) 1188/2019 Page 37 of 39144. The definitive medical evidence comes from the Post-MortemExamination conducted by Robert Chapman, Ex. CW-1/15, Consultant Forensic

Aman Vyas vs.union of India

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

fugitive from India to a foreign country or vice versa is governed by the provisions of the Indian Extradition Act, 1962. Thus contention of learned counsel for the petitioner at this stage that since no charge-sheet has been filed … 463. Kamlesh Babulal Aggarwal v. Union of India, 2008 VI AD (Delhi) 37 was recently decided by a Division Bench of which one of us … the petitioner has made combined submissions on the second and the third issues.16. He states that as per section 7(3) and (4) of the Extradiiton Act, the Court is only to satisfy itself that a prima facie

Salwant Singh Sandhu Vs. State of Delhi and Others

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 439; Extradition Act, 1962 - Sections 4, 5, 6, 9, 25, 34, 41(1) and 43(2); Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 420

Reported in : 2001IVAD(Delhi)576; 2001CriLJ3030; 91(2001)DLT577; 2001(59)DRJ116

the Code of Criminal Procedure (hereinafter referred to as 'the Code' only) read with Section 25 of the Extradition Act, 1962 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act' only) is for grant of bail to the petitioner arrested under Section … of his submissions, learned counsel for respondent No.3 relies upon judgments in M. Bhaskaran Vs . State, : 37(1989)DLT298 , Darshan Kumar Vs . State, : 65(1997)DLT933 and Flemming Ludin Larsen Vs . Union of India :