Advanced Search Results

Flemming LudIn Larsen Vs. Union of India

Court : Delhi

Subject : Narcotics

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Extradition Act, 1962 - Sections 5 and 7(1); Narcotic Drugs Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 36-A

Reported in : 1999IVAD(Delhi)447; 1999CriLJ3114; 80(1999)DLT324; 1999(50)DRJ507

New Delhi, to issue a provisional warrant for the arrest of the petitioner under section 34B(1) of the Extradition ACt, 1962 (for short 'the Act). Acceding to the request the learned A.C.M.M, New Delhi, on August 12, 1997 issued … offences thereunder. In support of his submission, learned counsel relied upon clause (a) of sub-section (1) of Section 36-A of the NDPS Act. According to the said provisions, any offence under the NDPS Act is triable only

Narendra Gudgud Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation (Eow)

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Section 13(1) and 13(2); ;Provisions of the Extradition Act, 1962 - Sections 19 and 36; ;Copyright Act; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 120B and 420; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Section 75; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 70, 77, 78, 79 and 482; ;Indian Law; ;Constitution of India - Articles 2, 9, 10 and 12

Reported in : 2009CriLJ4278

but is now in the USA the judiciary does not have any role to play. Provisions of the Extradition Act, 1962 and the Extradition Treaty between the USA and India would clearly reveal that the extradition proceedings can only … for the surrender or return to India of accused or convicted person who is in a foreign State. Section 36 empowers the Central Government to make rules to carry out the purposes of this Act and the Rules

Yatindra Kumar Aggarwal and Another Vs. Union of India and Another

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

that is whether the considerations which are required to be taken into account under Section 31(1)(d) of the Extradition Act, 1962 are to be examined by the Central Government prior to the issuance of an order of Magisterial Inquiry … Court in the case of Hans Muller of Nurenburg v. Superintendent, Presidency Jail, Calcutta and Others: AIR 195.SC 367.wherein, according to Mr Chandhiok, the Supreme Court held that under the extradition law, if a person is extradited

Himanshu Kulshrestha Vs. Union of India and Another

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

that is whether the considerations which are required to be taken into account under Section 31(1)(d) of the Extradition Act, 1962 are to be examined by the Central Government prior to the issuance of an order of Magisterial Inquiry … Court in the case of Hans Muller of Nurenburg v. Superintendent, Presidency Jail, Calcutta and Others: AIR 195.SC 367.wherein, according to Mr Chandhiok, the Supreme Court held that under the extradition law, if a person is extradited

Jugal Kishore More Vs. Chief Presidency Magistrate Calcutta and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 46, 75 to 86, 186 to 189, 403, 429, 439, 514 and 555; ;Constitution of India - Articles 21, 73, 227 and 394; ;Extradition Act, 1962 - Sections 2, 3(1), 19, 35 and 37; ;Fugitive Offenders Act, 1881 - Sections 13 and 26; ;General Clauses Act, 1897 - Section 3; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 3, 4, 120B, 216, 420, 467 and 471

Reported in : AIR1968Cal220,1968CriLJ604,71CWN508

strongly contended by Mr. Dutt in the very fact that after the Supreme Court decision and beforeenactment of Extradition Act, 1962, instructions were given' as above. But his Lordship finds 'an incorrectitude' in instruction (b) just reproduced, which, to … withoutany modification to every commonwealth country, 'notwithstanding anything to the contrary in Section 3 or Section 12'; (ii) Section 36 conferring on the Central Government the power to make rules; and (iii) Section 37 repealing, among others, the

Omesh Chander Kashyap vs.union of India

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate vide order dated 31.03.2015, after a full fledged enquiry under Section 7 of the Extradition Act, 1962 (hereinafter called as „Act‟) recommended for the extradition of the petitioner to Canada, the requesting State. The W.P(Crl.) … remarked that he can appear and defend himself before the appropriate Court in Canada and face the trial.” 36. On the requisition/request of a foreign country, if the Central Government directs for an inquiry into the offence

Kanwarjeet Singh Batth vs Union of India

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

by Amritsar Police, the Petitioner was sent to judicial custody on 22.10.2014.8. As per Section 34(b)(2) of the Extradition Act, 1962 any fugitivearrested under sub-section (1), is entitled to be discharged if no request for his Surrender or Return … at the scene. I understand a knife had been found in a bathroom cabinet.”Signed By:VIKAS W.P.(CRL.) 1188/2019 Page 36 of 39143. The following were the conclusions given by Robert Chapman:1. Opinder Randhawa was a young man who

Brij Bhushan Bansal Vs. Union of India and Another

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

that is whether the considerations which are required to be taken into account under Section 31(1)(d) of the Extradition Act, 1962 are to be examined by the Central Government prior to the issuance of an order of Magisterial Inquiry … Court in the case of Hans Muller of Nurenburg v. Superintendent, Presidency Jail, Calcutta and Others: AIR 195.SC 367.wherein, according to Mr Chandhiok, the Supreme Court held that under the extradition law, if a person is extradited

Lennox James Ellis vs.union of India

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

August‟ 2016, issued by the Respondent W.P.(CRL) No.3432/ 2017 Page 1 of 45 under Section 5 of the Extradition Act‟ 1962 seeking an inquiry by the Court of the Ld. Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate 01, Patiala House Courts, New … as soon as may be after it is made or issued, be laid before each House of Parliament.51. Section 36 contains the rule making power of the Central Government to carry out the purpose of the Act. Section

Verhoeven, Marie-Emmanuelle Vs. Union of India and Ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Right to Information

order is purported to have been issued in exercise of powers conferred by Section 4(1) of the Indian Extradition Act, 1962. Section 4(1) has no relevance to the context. What is relevant is Section 3(1) of the Act. The third … 28th April, 2015. However, this makes no difference to the ultimate result of this case. The factual background 36. On 1st April, 1991 (the first Red Notice issued by Interpol erroneously shows the year as 1992) a