Advanced Search Results

Jugal Kishore More Vs. Chief Presidency Magistrate Calcutta and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 46, 75 to 86, 186 to 189, 403, 429, 439, 514 and 555; ;Constitution of India - Articles 21, 73, 227 and 394; ;Extradition Act, 1962 - Sections 2, 3(1), 19, 35 and 37; ;Fugitive Offenders Act, 1881 - Sections 13 and 26; ;General Clauses Act, 1897 - Section 3; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 3, 4, 120B, 216, 420, 467 and 471

Reported in : AIR1968Cal220,1968CriLJ604,71CWN508

strongly contended by Mr. Dutt in the very fact that after the Supreme Court decision and beforeenactment of Extradition Act, 1962, instructions were given' as above. But his Lordship finds 'an incorrectitude' in instruction (b) just reproduced, which, to … 2, Clause (h), means an order notified in the Official Gazette. Such definition is to be read with Section 35 in Chapter V, providing inter alia that every notified order shall, as soon as may be after it

Puneet vs.u O I

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

ASHUTOSH KUMAR JUDGMENT ASHUTOSH KUMAR, J1 The petitioner, who is facing inquiry under Section 7 of the Indian Extradition Act, 1962 (hereinafter called as „Act‟) has challenged the order bearing No.T-413/48/2009 dated 08.06.2000 passed by the Ministry of External … Treaty with Australia of the year 2011, have been laid before each house of Parliament, as mandated under Section 35 of the Act.4. Brief narration of facts which are necessary for deciding the present writ petition is set

Lennox James Ellis vs.union of India

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

August‟ 2016, issued by the Respondent W.P.(CRL) No.3432/ 2017 Page 1 of 45 under Section 5 of the Extradition Act‟ 1962 seeking an inquiry by the Court of the Ld. Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate 01, Patiala House Courts, New … Order dated 23rd August, 2016 has not been laid before either house of the Parliament as mandated by Section 35 of the Act. He submits that the use of the word „shall‟ in Section 35 of the Act

Abu Salem Abdul Qayoom Ansari Vs. State of Maharashtra and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 - Sections 3(2)(i), 3(2)(ii), 3(3), 3(5), 5, 19; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 120B, 302, 307, 387, 382; Constitution of India - Article 32

Blast Case No. 1 of 1993, as violative of the Rule of Speciality and Section 21 of the Extradition Act, 1962; (d) issue a writ of Mandamus to release and discharge the writ petitioner by quashing all the proceedings … Sections 3, 4 and 5 of the TADA Act read with Sections 3, 7(a), 25(1A), 25(1AA), 26, 29, 35 of the Arms Act, 1959 read with Sections 3, 4, 5 and 6 of the Explosive Substances Act,

Joseph Palanivel Jeyapaul Vs. Union of India

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

petition, it is mentioned that the Petitioner filed a representation dated 01.09.2014 in terms of Section 7(4) of Extradition Act, 1962 to the Government of India seeking his discharge but no communication has been received by the Petitioner in … Union of India (Supra), the Supreme Court has considered the scope and power of Extradition Magistrate. In para 35 of the report, it was held as under : ‘35. In a proceeding for extradition no witness is

Yatindra Kumar Aggarwal and Another Vs. Union of India and Another

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

that is whether the considerations which are required to be taken into account under Section 31(1)(d) of the Extradition Act, 1962 are to be examined by the Central Government prior to the issuance of an order of Magisterial Inquiry

Himanshu Kulshrestha Vs. Union of India and Another

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

that is whether the considerations which are required to be taken into account under Section 31(1)(d) of the Extradition Act, 1962 are to be examined by the Central Government prior to the issuance of an order of Magisterial Inquiry

Omesh Chander Kashyap vs.union of India

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate vide order dated 31.03.2015, after a full fledged enquiry under Section 7 of the Extradition Act, 1962 (hereinafter called as „Act‟) recommended for the extradition of the petitioner to Canada, the requesting State. The W.P(Crl.) … Court in Canada. The charges leveled against the petitioner were found to be akin to offences under Sections 354 and 509 of the IPC, punishment for which at both the places i.e. at the requesting State as

Brij Bhushan Bansal Vs. Union of India and Another

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

that is whether the considerations which are required to be taken into account under Section 31(1)(d) of the Extradition Act, 1962 are to be examined by the Central Government prior to the issuance of an order of Magisterial Inquiry

Kanwarjeet Singh Batth vs Union of India

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

by Amritsar Police, the Petitioner was sent to judicial custody on 22.10.2014.8. As per Section 34(b)(2) of the Extradition Act, 1962 any fugitivearrested under sub-section (1), is entitled to be discharged if no request for his Surrender or Return … of fluid around the heart. This scam was performed by Dr. Manojit Chaudhary, Signed By:VIKAS W.P.(CRL.) 1188/2019 Page 35 of 39specialist, registrar, A&E. Blood gas is performed at the time show that this was unlikely to be