Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: extradition act 1962 section 34 · Page 1 of about 75 results (0.030 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Apr 17 2007

Bansil Mutei Shiblaq Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Apr-17-2007

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Extradition Act, 1962 - Sections 4, 5, 7, 7(3), 7(4), 9, 34B, 34B(1), 34B(2), 34B(3) and 34(2); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 397; Constitution of India - Article 21

Reported in : 2007(96)DRJ120

the Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate (ACMM) dated 21-3-2007, rejecting his application for discharge under Section 34-B(2) of the Extradition Act, 1962 (hereafter 'the Act').2. The facts necessary to decide the petition are that the petitioner, a UK national, professes

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 12 2008

Ram K. Mahbubani Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Sep-12-2008

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Extradition Act, 1962 - Sections 2, 3, 3(3), 4 to 11, 5, 6, 12 to 18, 24, 34, 34B and 1343; Extradition Act, 1870; Fugitive Offenders Act, 1881; Extradition Act, 1903; Bare Act; Extradition (Amendment) Act, 1993 - Sections 8; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 228; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 415, 417 and 420; Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908

Reported in : 153(2008)DLT471; 2008(106)DRJ906

issuance of a writ of Habeas Corpus securing the release of the Petitioner under Section 24 of the Extradition Act, 1962 ('Extradition Act' for short); secondly, for quashing of the Orders of the learned ACMM dated 31.5.2007 and 28.7.2007 … 14, 1999. The Respondents have further stated that the provisional arrest was pursuant to the powers contained in Section 34-B of the Extradition Act. The Orders dated 12.5.2005 are of the Judicial Magistrate, Alandur, Chennai. The Petitioner thereafter

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 21 2015

Verhoeven, Marie-Emmanuelle Vs. Union of India Through Ministry of Ext ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Sep-21-2015

Subject : Right to Information

dated 24.02.2015 of the Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Patiala House Courts, New Delhi under Section 34-B of the Extradition Act, 1962. Thereafter, accepting the extradition request dated 24.03.2015 made by the Republic of Chile, by order dated 18.05.2015 the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Mar 16 2026

Kanwarjeet Singh Batth vs Union of India

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-16-2026

Subject : Criminal

by Amritsar Police, the Petitioner was sent to judicial custody on 22.10.2014.8. As per Section 34(b)(2) of the Extradition Act, 1962 any fugitivearrested under sub-section (1), is entitled to be discharged if no request for his Surrender or Return

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 23 2001

Salwant Singh Sandhu Vs. State of Delhi and Others

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Apr-23-2001

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 439; Extradition Act, 1962 - Sections 4, 5, 6, 9, 25, 34, 41(1) and 43(2); Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 420

Reported in : 2001IVAD(Delhi)576; 2001CriLJ3030; 91(2001)DLT577; 2001(59)DRJ116

the Code of Criminal Procedure (hereinafter referred to as 'the Code' only) read with Section 25 of the Extradition Act, 1962 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act' only) is for grant of bail to the petitioner arrested under Section … 9 of the Act. He also argues that even provisional warrants of arrest could be obtained under Section 34(b) of the Act if immediate arrest of the fugitive was required. It is also submitted that on the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 10 2010

Abu Salem Abdul Qayoom Ansari Vs. State of Maharashtra and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-10-2010

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 - Sections 3(2)(i), 3(2)(ii), 3(3), 3(5), 5, 19; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 120B, 302, 307, 387, 382; Constitution of India - Article 32

Blast Case No. 1 of 1993, as violative of the Rule of Speciality and Section 21 of the Extradition Act, 1962; (d) issue a writ of Mandamus to release and discharge the writ petitioner by quashing all the proceedings … Criminal Case No. CR No. 52/2001 of Crime Branch -CID Mumbai. And Section 307 (Attempt to Murder); and 34 (Acts done by several persons in furtherance of common intention) of Indian Penal Code in connection with CR

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 08 2019

Lennox James Ellis vs.union of India

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-08-2019

Subject : Land Acquisition

August‟ 2016, issued by the Respondent W.P.(CRL) No.3432/ 2017 Page 1 of 45 under Section 5 of the Extradition Act1962 seeking an inquiry by the Court of the Ld. Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate 01, Patiala House Courts, New … the Ministry of External Affairs, Union of India moved a provisional arrest application against the petitioner under section 34B of the Extradition Act1962 (hereinafter referred to as „The Act‟) before the Ld. ACMM-01, Patiala House Courts,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 28 2016

Verhoeven, Marie-Emmanuelle Vs. Union of India and Ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-28-2016

Subject : Right to Information

order is purported to have been issued in exercise of powers conferred by Section 4(1) of the Indian Extradition Act, 1962. Section 4(1) has no relevance to the context. What is relevant is Section 3(1) of the Act. The third … extradition in respect of the offences specified in that Convention.” 26. Another important provision in the Act is Section 34-B relating to a provisional arrest. This Section provides that on receipt of an urgent request from a foreign

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 07 2017

Puneet vs.u O I

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Nov-07-2017

Subject : Land Acquisition

ASHUTOSH KUMAR JUDGMENT ASHUTOSH KUMAR, J1 The petitioner, who is facing inquiry under Section 7 of the Indian Extradition Act, 1962 (hereinafter called as „Act‟) has challenged the order bearing No.T-413/48/2009 dated 08.06.2000 passed by the Ministry of External

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 09 2017

Omesh Chander Kashyap vs.union of India

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Aug-09-2017

Subject : Land Acquisition

country. It has been submitted that this provision of the Treaty is in tune with the requirements under Section 34 & 34A of the Extradition Act, 1962 which provide that an extradition offence committed by any person in … Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate vide order dated 31.03.2015, after a full fledged enquiry under Section 7 of the Extradition Act, 1962 (hereinafter called as „Act‟) recommended for the extradition of the petitioner to Canada, the requesting State. The W.P(Crl.)

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial