Advanced Search Results

Abu Salem Abdul Qayoom Ansari Vs. State of Maharashtra and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 - Sections 3(2)(i), 3(2)(ii), 3(3), 3(5), 5, 19; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 120B, 302, 307, 387, 382; Constitution of India - Article 32

Blast Case No. 1 of 1993, as violative of the Rule of Speciality and Section 21 of the Extradition Act, 1962; (d) issue a writ of Mandamus to release and discharge the writ petitioner by quashing all the proceedings … of the abovesaid appeals, the appellant has also filed Writ Petition (Crl.) No. 171 of 2006 under Article 32 of the Constitution of India seeking a) to issue a writ of Certiorari to quash the charges framed

Rosiline George Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Extradition Act, 1962 - Sections 2, 3, 5 and 10; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 177, 188 and 190; Constitution of India - Articles 32 and 372(1); International Law; Government of India Act, 1935 - Sections 11; India (Adaptation of Existing Indian Laws) Order, 1947; Adaptation of Laws Order, 1950; Indian Independence (International Agreements) Order, 1947

Reported in : 1993(3)Crimes583(SC); JT1993(6)SC51; 1993(4)SCALE230; (1994)2SCC80; [1993]Supp3SCR141; 1994(1)LC628(SC)

The Ministry of External Affairs, Government of India, in exercise of its powers under Section 5 of the Extradition Act, 1962 (the 'Act') passed an order dated December 5, 1988 requesting the Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Patiala House, New … by Rosiline and George, are against the judgment of the Delhi High Court. The writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution of India has been filed by George challenging the extradition proceedings on various grounds.3. The

Kanwarjeet Singh Batth vs Union of India

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

by Amritsar Police, the Petitioner was sent to judicial custody on 22.10.2014.8. As per Section 34(b)(2) of the Extradition Act, 1962 any fugitivearrested under sub-section (1), is entitled to be discharged if no request for his Surrender or Return … highest, establish that the Petitioner stabbed the Victim with the intent of murder. Signed By:VIKAS W.P.(CRL.) 1188/2019 Page 32 of 39130. In the present case, not even one single witness actually saw thePetitioner stab the Victim. The

Jugal Kishore More Vs. Chief Presidency Magistrate Calcutta and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 46, 75 to 86, 186 to 189, 403, 429, 439, 514 and 555; ;Constitution of India - Articles 21, 73, 227 and 394; ;Extradition Act, 1962 - Sections 2, 3(1), 19, 35 and 37; ;Fugitive Offenders Act, 1881 - Sections 13 and 26; ;General Clauses Act, 1897 - Section 3; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 3, 4, 120B, 216, 420, 467 and 471

Reported in : AIR1968Cal220,1968CriLJ604,71CWN508

strongly contended by Mr. Dutt in the very fact that after the Supreme Court decision and beforeenactment of Extradition Act, 1962, instructions were given' as above. But his Lordship finds 'an incorrectitude' in instruction (b) just reproduced, which, to … Alak Gupta does not.11. On a difference as this, what is apt to call one's attention first is Section 32 of the Procedure Code, which bears:'A warrant of arrest may be executed at any place in India.'We all

George Kutty Kuncheria Vs. Union of India and Another

Court : Delhi

Subject : CriminalConstitution

Acts : Extradition Act, 1962 - Sections 24; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 1998IIAD(Delhi)842; 1998CriLJ1871; 71(1998)DLT726; 1998(44)DRJ627

the Ministry of External Affairs, Government of India for extradition of the petitioner under Section 4 of the Extradition Act, 1962 (for short 'the Act') to United States of America on the ground that the petitioner embezzled $ 1.5 … by way of special leave petitions against the judgment of this Court. Besides, a writ petition under Article 32 was also filed before the Supreme Court challenging the extradition proceedings. On February 20, 1991 the Supreme Court

Christian Michel James vs Union of India and Ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Right to Information

sections into the chargesheet filed against a fugitive Extradited from UAE, Ultra virus of Section 21 of the Extradition Act 1962.Digitally Signed WP(Crl) 3868/2025 Page 1 of 19b) Issue appropriate Writ order direction declaring that non application of the … Mr. Carlo Gerosa, in conspiracy with Mr. Bruno Spagnolini, CEO of M/s AgustaWestland International Ltd., had paid Euro 326,000/- to Mr. S.P. Tyagi as kickbacks in order to subvert the mandatory flying altitude of 6000 metres to

Union of India Vs. Ashok Kumar Sharma

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

an offence, and for which he is, under any law relating to extradition, or otherwise, liable to be apprehended or detained in custody in India; … Revenue Intelligence (DRI), invested with powers of investigation under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Customs Act, 1962 and under the Railway Property (Unlawful Possession) Act, 1966, are not Police Officers. It is, therefore, the case … 1 a FIR can be registered under Section 154 of the CrPC and the case investigated or whether Section 32 of the Act supplants the procedure for investigation of offences under CrPC and the taking of cognizance of

Verhoeven, Marie-Emmanuelle Vs. Union of India Through Ministry of Ext ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Right to Information

dated 24.02.2015 of the Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Patiala House Courts, New Delhi under Section 34-B of the Extradition Act, 1962. Thereafter, accepting the extradition request dated 24.03.2015 made by the Republic of Chile, by order dated 18.05.2015 the … the provisional arrest and detention of the petitioner cannot be held to be illegal on any ground whatsoever. 32. As mentioned above, the contention on behalf of the petitioner is that in the absence of a direction

Verhoeven, Marie-Emmanuelle Vs. Union of India and Ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Right to Information

order is purported to have been issued in exercise of powers conferred by Section 4(1) of the Indian Extradition Act, 1962. Section 4(1) has no relevance to the context. What is relevant is Section 3(1) of the Act. The third … applicable to the Republic of Chile.31. The notified order contains three errors and it is reproduced below:- “G.S.R. 328(E) - Whereas the Extradition Treaty between the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland, and the Republic of

Yatindra Kumar Aggarwal and Another Vs. Union of India and Another

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

that is whether the considerations which are required to be taken into account under Section 31(1)(d) of the Extradition Act, 1962 are to be examined by the Central Government prior to the issuance of an order of Magisterial Inquiry