Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: extradition act 1962 section 31 · Page 1 of about 75 results (0.028 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Feb 15 1980

Prem Swarup Puri Vs. Delhi Administration and Union of India

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Feb-15-1980

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Extradition Act, 1962 - Sections 21; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : ILR1980Delhi184

bases his claim on the mandate in Article one of the decree and section 21 of the Indian Extradition Act 1962 (the Act). The Union of India, on the other hand, contend that they are entitled to try him … The offences disclosed in Nos. (i) and (ii) above are the subject matter of cases RCI/FS(1)162 and Rcr 31lEW;65 and the offence in (iii) was RC. 4/EW/68. The French Government granted extradition of the petitioner by an

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 21 2012

Yatindra Kumar Aggarwal and Another Vs. Union of India and Another

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Dec-21-2012

Subject : Education

that is whether the considerations which are required to be taken into account under Section 31(1)(d) of the Extradition Act, 1962 are to be examined by the Central Government prior to the issuance of an order of Magisterial Inquiry

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 21 2012

Himanshu Kulshrestha Vs. Union of India and Another

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Dec-21-2012

Subject : Education

that is whether the considerations which are required to be taken into account under Section 31(1)(d) of the Extradition Act, 1962 are to be examined by the Central Government prior to the issuance of an order of Magisterial Inquiry

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Dec 21 2012

Brij Bhushan Bansal Vs. Union of India and Another

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Dec-21-2012

Subject : Education

that is whether the considerations which are required to be taken into account under Section 31(1)(d) of the Extradition Act, 1962 are to be examined by the Central Government prior to the issuance of an order of Magisterial Inquiry

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 09 2017

Omesh Chander Kashyap vs.union of India

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Aug-09-2017

Subject : Land Acquisition

Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate vide order dated 31.03.2015, after a full fledged enquiry under Section 7 of the Extradition Act, 1962 (hereinafter called as „Act‟) recommended for the extradition of the petitioner to Canada, the requesting State. The W.P(Crl.)

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 17 2012

Niranjan Patel Vs. Uoi

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Apr-17-2012

Subject : Land Acquisition

passed by the learned Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate-01, Patiala House Courts, New Delhi under Section 5 of the Extradition Act, 1962 in CC. No.79/1/08 whereby the learned Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate recommended extradition of the Petitioner to the United … foregoing offenses, or aiding or abetting a person who commits or attempts to commit such offenses.” 9. Section 31(1) (a) of the Extradition Act provides that a fugitive criminal shall not be surrendered or returned to a

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 16 2026

Kanwarjeet Singh Batth vs Union of India

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-16-2026

Subject : Criminal

by Amritsar Police, the Petitioner was sent to judicial custody on 22.10.2014.8. As per Section 34(b)(2) of the Extradition Act, 1962 any fugitivearrested under sub-section (1), is entitled to be discharged if no request for his Surrender or Return … cooled down, while Opinderpal could calm down in the house. At this time, Signed By:VIKAS W.P.(CRL.) 1188/2019 Page 31 of 39 Amanpreet received a telephonic call which lasted around 5-7 minutes, after which he returned to the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 20 1967

Jugal Kishore More Vs. Chief Presidency Magistrate Calcutta and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Apr-20-1967

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 46, 75 to 86, 186 to 189, 403, 429, 439, 514 and 555; ;Constitution of India - Articles 21, 73, 227 and 394; ;Extradition Act, 1962 - Sections 2, 3(1), 19, 35 and 37; ;Fugitive Offenders Act, 1881 - Sections 13 and 26; ;General Clauses Act, 1897 - Section 3; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 3, 4, 120B, 216, 420, 467 and 471

Reported in : AIR1968Cal220,1968CriLJ604,71CWN508

strongly contended by Mr. Dutt in the very fact that after the Supreme Court decision and beforeenactment of Extradition Act, 1962, instructions were given' as above. But his Lordship finds 'an incorrectitude' in instruction (b) just reproduced, which, to … Central Government is empowered to discharge a fugitive criminal in certain circumstances, e. g., on political reasons,) and Section 31 (by which are imposed restrictions on surrender of a fugitive criminal involved, amongst others, in an offence of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 22 1973

State Vs. Prem Sarup Purl

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-22-1973

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Extradition Act, 1962 - Sections 20

Reported in : ILR1973Delhi803

this regard he may apply to the trying Magistrate. Cr. Misc. 799 of 1972 is ordered accordingly. Indian Extradition Act (1962) - Sections 20 & 21-Scope and applicability of, with respect to facts of instant case-legal position to be … we consider is the legal position to be gathered from Sections 20 and 21 of the Act. (43) Section 31 ofthe Indian Act deals with the situation, the obverse of the present one, as to what the Indian

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 21 2015

Verhoeven, Marie-Emmanuelle Vs. Union of India Through Ministry of Ext ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Sep-21-2015

Subject : Right to Information

dated 24.02.2015 of the Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Patiala House Courts, New Delhi under Section 34-B of the Extradition Act, 1962. Thereafter, accepting the extradition request dated 24.03.2015 made by the Republic of Chile, by order dated 18.05.2015 the … arrest and detention of the petitioner in purported exercise of the powers conferred under the Act are illegal. 31. On the other hand, the contention of the respondents is that the Republic of Chile is a treaty

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial