Advanced Search Results

Abu Salem Abdul Qayoom Ansari @ Abdul Sa Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh R ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Education

else. India being a requesting State shall abide by the Extradition Order in view of Section 21 of Extradition Act, 1962. However, in gross infraction of Section 21(c) of the said Act, he was additionally tried, convicted and sentenced … On receipt of these reports, A4 despatched them to RPO, Secunderabad under the covering letter of SP dated 28- 06-2001 (vide Ex.P19).e) The further case of the prosecution is that on the strength of these reports, RPO

The Collector of Customs Now Known as the Commissioner of Customs (Air ...

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Customs

Acts : Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 108, 132 and 135; ;Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999; ;Extradition Act, 1962; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Section 105(B); ;Foreign Exchange Management (Export and Import of Currency) Regulation, 2000

the petitioner. However, there is nothing before this Court that necessary notification in this regard in terms of Extradition Act, 1962 has been issued.In this connection, in my opinion, it would be very relevant to refer an observation of … Kishore reported in : 1969CriLJ1559 . Where the Apex Court in Paragraph 28 held as follows;One more argument remains to be noticed. It is true … C.O. - 740121, withheld in connection with the Customs Case No. C-384/2008 relating to the offences punishable under Section 132/135 of the Customs Act, the petitioner moves the instant criminal revision.2. Mr. Biswa Ranjan Ghoshal, the learned

Verhoeven, Marie-Emmanuelle Vs. Union of India Through Ministry of Ext ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Right to Information

dated 24.02.2015 of the Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Patiala House Courts, New Delhi under Section 34-B of the Extradition Act, 1962. Thereafter, accepting the extradition request dated 24.03.2015 made by the Republic of Chile, by order dated 18.05.2015 the … of the Extradition Act, 1962, the other petition being W.P.(Crl.) No.1215/2015 has been filed assailing the Notification dated 28.04.2015 issued under Section 3(3) of the Extradition Act, 1962 as well as the order dated 18.05.2015 passed by

Abu Salem Abdul Qayoom Ansari Vs. State of Maharashtra and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 - Sections 3(2)(i), 3(2)(ii), 3(3), 3(5), 5, 19; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 120B, 302, 307, 387, 382; Constitution of India - Article 32

Blast Case No. 1 of 1993, as violative of the Rule of Speciality and Section 21 of the Extradition Act, 1962; (d) issue a writ of Mandamus to release and discharge the writ petitioner by quashing all the proceedings … MARTINS DA CRUZ bMINISTER FOR FOREIGN AFFAIRS PORTUGAL"20) In pursuance of all the above assurances and communications, on 28.03.2003, the Ministerial order came to be passed admitting extradition amongst others for Section 120B read with Section 302

Rajiv Chandrakant Shah vs.union of India

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Ministry of External Affairs vide letter dated 19.02.2002 directed for an enquiry under Section 5 of the Indian Extradition Act, 1962 regarding the allegations of commission of certain offences by the petitioner within the territory of United States of … No.1293/2017. Thereafter, the present writ petition was filed in which there is a prayer for release also. On 28.06.2017, a direction was given that the petitioner be not extradited till consideration of the present writ petition and

Omesh Chander Kashyap vs.union of India

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate vide order dated 31.03.2015, after a full fledged enquiry under Section 7 of the Extradition Act, 1962 (hereinafter called as „Act‟) recommended for the extradition of the petitioner to Canada, the requesting State. The W.P(Crl.) … * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + W.P(CRL) 2899/2015 OMESH CHANDER KASHYAP versus UNION OF INDIA Reserved on:26. 05.2017 Delivered on:09. 08.2017 ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates

P.Pushpavathy Vs. Ministry of External Affairs

Court : Chennai

Subject : Education

circumstances, the first respondent has passed an order vide proceedings No.T-413/18/2011, dated 08.03.2011, under Section 5 of the Extradition Act,1962, in short, ".the Act".. Pursuant to the said order, an application was filed by the first respondent before … of criminal sexual conduct. He is the subject of the second amended complaint in case No.68-CR-06-465 filed on 28.12.2010 in the District Court for the County of Roseau in the State of Minnesota which charged him with

Lennox James Ellis vs.union of India

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

August‟ 2016, issued by the Respondent W.P.(CRL) No.3432/ 2017 Page 1 of 45 under Section 5 of the Extradition Act‟ 1962 seeking an inquiry by the Court of the Ld. Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate 01, Patiala House Courts, New … the request of the Government of the Republic of Philippines. Thereafter, he was remanded to judicial custody on 28.06.2016. On 1st July 2016, the Ministry of External Affairs, Union of India moved a provisional arrest application against

Kanwarjeet Singh Batth vs Union of India

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

by Amritsar Police, the Petitioner was sent to judicial custody on 22.10.2014.8. As per Section 34(b)(2) of the Extradition Act, 1962 any fugitivearrested under sub-section (1), is entitled to be discharged if no request for his Surrender or Return … arrest. There is no evidence to prima facie establish that the murder was committed by the FC, on 28.12.2010. The Warrant is thus, without any evidence.37. The Statement of Lucy Nash dated 01.11.2013, Ex.CW-1/8 wasmade before the

Verhoeven, Marie-Emmanuelle Vs. Union of India and Ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Right to Information

order is purported to have been issued in exercise of powers conferred by Section 4(1) of the Indian Extradition Act, 1962. Section 4(1) has no relevance to the context. What is relevant is Section 3(1) of the Act. The third … [read with Section 3(3)]. of the Act. Apparently realizing this, the Government of India notified an Order dated 28th April, 2015 (gazetted on 29th April, 2015) under Section 3(1) read with Section 3(3) of the Act making