Advanced Search Results

Ram K. Mahbubani Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Extradition Act, 1962 - Sections 2, 3, 3(3), 4 to 11, 5, 6, 12 to 18, 24, 34, 34B and 1343; Extradition Act, 1870; Fugitive Offenders Act, 1881; Extradition Act, 1903; Bare Act; Extradition (Amendment) Act, 1993 - Sections 8; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 228; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 415, 417 and 420; Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908

Reported in : 153(2008)DLT471; 2008(106)DRJ906

issuance of a writ of Habeas Corpus securing the release of the Petitioner under Section 24 of the Extradition Act, 1962 ('Extradition Act' for short); secondly, for quashing of the Orders of the learned ACMM dated 31.5.2007 and 28.7.2007

George Kutty Kuncheria Vs. Union of India and Another

Court : Delhi

Subject : CriminalConstitution

Acts : Extradition Act, 1962 - Sections 24; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 1998IIAD(Delhi)842; 1998CriLJ1871; 71(1998)DLT726; 1998(44)DRJ627

the Ministry of External Affairs, Government of India for extradition of the petitioner under Section 4 of the Extradition Act, 1962 (for short 'the Act') to United States of America on the ground that the petitioner embezzled $ 1.5 … Government of India of his intention to make an application to the High Court seeking his discharge under Section 24 of the Extradition Act. This application was received by the Government of India, but the petitioner was not

Sri R. Sadagopan Vs. Sri K. Rajaiah S/O Late Sri N. Kodandarama Naidu

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Contempt of Court

Acts : Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 - Sections 2, 12, 13 and 15(1); Companies Act; Extradition Act, 1962 - Sections 21; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 313; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 24 - Order 1, Rule 10 - Order 6, Rules 16 and 17 - Order 7, Rule 11; Constitution of India - Article 226; Contempt of Court Rules - Rule 11

Reported in : ILR2009KAR3302; 2009(6)KarLJ239

facing trial in eight cases, which is in complete violation of the provisions of Section 21 of the Extradition Act, 1962 and he had also pleaded that, he was being kept in solitary confinement without proper medical aid in … etc., of the estate left by K.Kuppuswamy Naidu.(f) Ex.C.6 - Misc. No. 893/07, is a petition filed under Section 24 of C.P.C by the accused against two respondents, which includes complainant's wife Smt. Rajalakshmi Sadagopan @ Mumtaz Begum,

Verhoeven, Marie-Emmanuelle Vs. Union of India Through Ministry of Ext ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Right to Information

dated 24.02.2015 of the Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Patiala House Courts, New Delhi under Section 34-B of the Extradition Act, 1962. Thereafter, accepting the extradition request dated 24.03.2015 made by the Republic of Chile, by order dated 18.05.2015 the

Jugal Kishore More Vs. Chief Presidency Magistrate Calcutta and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 46, 75 to 86, 186 to 189, 403, 429, 439, 514 and 555; ;Constitution of India - Articles 21, 73, 227 and 394; ;Extradition Act, 1962 - Sections 2, 3(1), 19, 35 and 37; ;Fugitive Offenders Act, 1881 - Sections 13 and 26; ;General Clauses Act, 1897 - Section 3; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 3, 4, 120B, 216, 420, 467 and 471

Reported in : AIR1968Cal220,1968CriLJ604,71CWN508

strongly contended by Mr. Dutt in the very fact that after the Supreme Court decision and beforeenactment of Extradition Act, 1962, instructions were given' as above. But his Lordship finds 'an incorrectitude' in instruction (b) just reproduced, which, to … with according to law.' B. arrest two days later, namely, on November 24, 1965, at Hong Kong of More, who appeared before the Central Magistrate … Bijayesh Mukherjee, J. 1. This is a case laid before me under Section 439, Sub-section (1), read with Section 429, of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 5 of 1898, with the

Abu Salem Abdul Qayoom Ansari Vs. State of Maharashtra and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 - Sections 3(2)(i), 3(2)(ii), 3(3), 3(5), 5, 19; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 120B, 302, 307, 387, 382; Constitution of India - Article 32

Blast Case No. 1 of 1993, as violative of the Rule of Speciality and Section 21 of the Extradition Act, 1962; (d) issue a writ of Mandamus to release and discharge the writ petitioner by quashing all the proceedings … the application for his extradition."Similar principle is found in Halsbury's laws of England, 4th Ed., Vol. 18, Para 246:"Extradition and Fugitive Offenders246. Trial on other charges. Where a person accused or convicted of an extradition crime is

Rajiv Chandrakant Shah vs.union of India

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

of the ACMM was accepted on 16.06.2017. It is therefore, submitted that in accordance with the provisions of Section 24 of the Extradition Act, 1962 which commands that if a fugitive criminal has been committed to prison to … Ministry of External Affairs vide letter dated 19.02.2002 directed for an enquiry under Section 5 of the Indian Extradition Act, 1962 regarding the allegations of commission of certain offences by the petitioner within the territory of United States of

Omesh Chander Kashyap vs.union of India

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate vide order dated 31.03.2015, after a full fledged enquiry under Section 7 of the Extradition Act, 1962 (hereinafter called as „Act‟) recommended for the extradition of the petitioner to Canada, the requesting State. The W.P(Crl.) … of Sections 24 & 29 of the Act has to be strictly interpreted/enforced.28. It has been submitted that Section 24 of the Extradition Act mandates that if a fugitive criminal has not been conveyed to the W.P(Crl.) 2899/2015

Yatindra Kumar Aggarwal and Another Vs. Union of India and Another

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

in Mohd. Jafeer (supra) of the Madras High Court is also not relevant inasmuch as that pertains to Section 24 of the Extradition Act, 1962, which is not in issue here.40. In Bhavesh Jayanti Lakhani v. State of … that is whether the considerations which are required to be taken into account under Section 31(1)(d) of the Extradition Act, 1962 are to be examined by the Central Government prior to the issuance of an order of Magisterial Inquiry

Himanshu Kulshrestha Vs. Union of India and Another

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

in Mohd. Jafeer (supra) of the Madras High Court is also not relevant inasmuch as that pertains to Section 24 of the Extradition Act, 1962, which is not in issue here.40. In Bhavesh Jayanti Lakhani v. State of … that is whether the considerations which are required to be taken into account under Section 31(1)(d) of the Extradition Act, 1962 are to be examined by the Central Government prior to the issuance of an order of Magisterial Inquiry