Advanced Search Results

Christian Michel James vs Union of India and Ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Right to Information

sections into the chargesheet filed against a fugitive Extradited from UAE, Ultra virus of Section 21 of the Extradition Act 1962.Digitally Signed WP(Crl) 3868/2025 Page 1 of 19b) Issue appropriate Writ order direction declaring that non application of the … recommendations passed by the Human Rights Council Working Group on Arbitrary Detention on its eighty-ninth session, held on 23-27 November 2020 in Opinion No. 88/2020, it was opined that great human rights violations had been committed by

Yatindra Kumar Aggarwal and Another Vs. Union of India and Another

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

that is whether the considerations which are required to be taken into account under Section 31(1)(d) of the Extradition Act, 1962 are to be examined by the Central Government prior to the issuance of an order of Magisterial Inquiry … (Rajasthan) and the third one in Agra (U.P.). In Delhi, it was Case No.52/2005 under Sections 21, 22, 23 and 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (hereinafter referred to as the NDPS Act).

Himanshu Kulshrestha Vs. Union of India and Another

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

that is whether the considerations which are required to be taken into account under Section 31(1)(d) of the Extradition Act, 1962 are to be examined by the Central Government prior to the issuance of an order of Magisterial Inquiry … (Rajasthan) and the third one in Agra (U.P.). In Delhi, it was Case No.52/2005 under Sections 21, 22, 23 and 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (hereinafter referred to as the NDPS Act).

Brij Bhushan Bansal Vs. Union of India and Another

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

that is whether the considerations which are required to be taken into account under Section 31(1)(d) of the Extradition Act, 1962 are to be examined by the Central Government prior to the issuance of an order of Magisterial Inquiry … (Rajasthan) and the third one in Agra (U.P.). In Delhi, it was Case No.52/2005 under Sections 21, 22, 23 and 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (hereinafter referred to as the NDPS Act).

Verhoeven, Marie-Emmanuelle Vs. Union of India and Ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Right to Information

and the Republic of Chile continued in force as far as India is concerned. The Extradition Act, 1962 23. To avoid any misgivings and apprehensions about the status of the extradition treaties entered into between British India … order is purported to have been issued in exercise of powers conferred by Section 4(1) of the Indian Extradition Act, 1962. Section 4(1) has no relevance to the context. What is relevant is Section 3(1) of the Act. The third

State of Nct of Delhi Vs. Abu Salem Abdul Qayoom Ansari

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

here since there was no Extradition Treaty between the two countries, by virtue of Section 21 of the Extradition Act, 1962 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Act’), a Notification, extending the applicability of the Act to the Republic of … of the respondent/accused in respect of the present FIR No.88/2002 was shown. 6. On 16.8.2007, sanction under Section 23(2) of MCOCA was granted by the competent authority to prosecute the respondent/accused. On 20.8.2007, a Supplementary Charge-sheet against

Abu Salem Abdul Qayoom Ansari Vs. State of Maharashtra and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 - Sections 3(2)(i), 3(2)(ii), 3(3), 3(5), 5, 19; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 120B, 302, 307, 387, 382; Constitution of India - Article 32

Blast Case No. 1 of 1993, as violative of the Rule of Speciality and Section 21 of the Extradition Act, 1962; (d) issue a writ of Mandamus to release and discharge the writ petitioner by quashing all the proceedings … for your letter October 4, 2002 in response to the letter of our External Affairs Minister of September 23, 2002 regarding the return of Abu Salem Abdul Qayoom Ansari to India. In your letter, you had advised

Omesh Chander Kashyap vs.union of India

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate vide order dated 31.03.2015, after a full fledged enquiry under Section 7 of the Extradition Act, 1962 (hereinafter called as „Act‟) recommended for the extradition of the petitioner to Canada, the requesting State. The W.P(Crl.) … merits of the case in which petitioner is involved. the respondent. Neither the opinion of W.P(Crl.) 2899/2015 Page 23 of 30 XXXX XXXX XXX XXXX XXXX20 This submission deserves outright rejection. The opinion that a prima facie

Puneet vs.u O I

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

ASHUTOSH KUMAR JUDGMENT ASHUTOSH KUMAR, J1 The petitioner, who is facing inquiry under Section 7 of the Indian Extradition Act, 1962 (hereinafter called as „Act‟) has challenged the order bearing No.T-413/48/2009 dated 08.06.2000 passed by the Ministry of External … of India and Australia was notified. The extradition treaty between India and Australia was signed at Canberra on 23.06.2008 and the treaty entered into force w.e.f. 20.01.2011 in accordance with Article 20.1 of the Treaty (Article 20.1

Rajiv Chandrakant Shah vs.union of India

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Ministry of External Affairs vide letter dated 19.02.2002 directed for an enquiry under Section 5 of the Indian Extradition Act, 1962 regarding the allegations of commission of certain offences by the petitioner within the territory of United States of … criminal and for his delivery at a place and to a person to be named in the warrant.” 23. The Magistrate under Section 7 of the Act is only to make an inquiry and not to hold