Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: extradition act 1962 section 22 · Page 1 of about 88 results (0.038 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

May 31 1999

Flemming LudIn Larsen Vs. Union of India

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-31-1999

Subject : Narcotics

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Extradition Act, 1962 - Sections 5 and 7(1); Narcotic Drugs Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 36-A

Reported in : 1999IVAD(Delhi)447; 1999CriLJ3114; 80(1999)DLT324; 1999(50)DRJ507

New Delhi, to issue a provisional warrant for the arrest of the petitioner under section 34B(1) of the Extradition ACt, 1962 (for short 'the Act). Acceding to the request the learned A.C.M.M, New Delhi, on August 12, 1997 issued … the Extradition Treaty between the United States of America and the United Kingdom signed at London on December 22, 1931 and made applicable to India in accordance with Article 14 thereof from March 9, 1942. On receiving

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 28 2016

Verhoeven, Marie-Emmanuelle Vs. Union of India and Ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-28-2016

Subject : Right to Information

order is purported to have been issued in exercise of powers conferred by Section 4(1) of the Indian Extradition Act, 1962. Section 4(1) has no relevance to the context. What is relevant is Section 3(1) of the Act. The third … the President of the Republic of Chile ratified the Treaty which was brought in force from and after 22nd August, 1898.17. Soon thereafter, the Gazette of India of 12th November, 1898 reproduced the Order in Council published

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 10 2010

Abu Salem Abdul Qayoom Ansari Vs. State of Maharashtra and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-10-2010

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 - Sections 3(2)(i), 3(2)(ii), 3(3), 3(5), 5, 19; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 120B, 302, 307, 387, 382; Constitution of India - Article 32

Blast Case No. 1 of 1993, as violative of the Rule of Speciality and Section 21 of the Extradition Act, 1962; (d) issue a writ of Mandamus to release and discharge the writ petitioner by quashing all the proceedings … offence' in Section 21 of the Extradition Act covers wider matters than the phraseology "minor offence" in Section 222 of Criminal Procedure Code. It was also held by the Designated Court that although the overt acts with

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Feb 15 1980

Prem Swarup Puri Vs. Delhi Administration and Union of India

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Feb-15-1980

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Extradition Act, 1962 - Sections 21; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : ILR1980Delhi184

bases his claim on the mandate in Article one of the decree and section 21 of the Indian Extradition Act 1962 (the Act). The Union of India, on the other hand, contend that they are entitled to try him … (1) This is an extradition case. The petitioner Prem Swarup Puri has brought this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution. He is a citizen of India. When he was standing trial in criminal cases here

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 08 2026

Christian Michel James vs Union of India and Ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Apr-08-2026

Subject : Right to Information

sections into the chargesheet filed against a fugitive Extradited from UAE, Ultra virus of Section 21 of the Extradition Act 1962.Digitally Signed WP(Crl) 3868/2025 Page 1 of 19b) Issue appropriate Writ order direction declaring that non application of the … offences.Digitally Signed WP(Crl) 3868/2025 Page 9 of 1921. He submits that the Treaty is in conformity with Article 224read with Article 253 of the Constitution of India and is not in any manner ultra vires Section 21

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 21 2012

Yatindra Kumar Aggarwal and Another Vs. Union of India and Another

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Dec-21-2012

Subject : Education

that is whether the considerations which are required to be taken into account under Section 31(1)(d) of the Extradition Act, 1962 are to be examined by the Central Government prior to the issuance of an order of Magisterial Inquiry … said note verbale.3. Acting on the said note verbale, the Ministry of External Affairs passed an order on 22.04.2010, which is to the following effect:MINISTRY OF EXTERNAL AFFAIRS CPV DIVISION, EXTRADITION SECTION PATIALA HOUSE ANNEXE, TILAK MARG

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 21 2012

Himanshu Kulshrestha Vs. Union of India and Another

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Dec-21-2012

Subject : Education

that is whether the considerations which are required to be taken into account under Section 31(1)(d) of the Extradition Act, 1962 are to be examined by the Central Government prior to the issuance of an order of Magisterial Inquiry … said note verbale.3. Acting on the said note verbale, the Ministry of External Affairs passed an order on 22.04.2010, which is to the following effect:MINISTRY OF EXTERNAL AFFAIRS CPV DIVISION, EXTRADITION SECTION PATIALA HOUSE ANNEXE, TILAK MARG

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 20 1967

Jugal Kishore More Vs. Chief Presidency Magistrate Calcutta and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Apr-20-1967

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 46, 75 to 86, 186 to 189, 403, 429, 439, 514 and 555; ;Constitution of India - Articles 21, 73, 227 and 394; ;Extradition Act, 1962 - Sections 2, 3(1), 19, 35 and 37; ;Fugitive Offenders Act, 1881 - Sections 13 and 26; ;General Clauses Act, 1897 - Section 3; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 3, 4, 120B, 216, 420, 467 and 471

Reported in : AIR1968Cal220,1968CriLJ604,71CWN508

strongly contended by Mr. Dutt in the very fact that after the Supreme Court decision and beforeenactment of Extradition Act, 1962, instructions were given' as above. But his Lordship finds 'an incorrectitude' in instruction (b) just reproduced, which, to … evincing inter alia-A. endorsement of the self-same warrant of arrest on November 22, 19G5, by Magistrate D. Cons of the Central Magistracy, Hong Kong, to … Bijayesh Mukherjee, J. 1. This is a case laid before me under Section 439, Sub-section (1), read with Section 429, of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 5 of 1898, with the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 21 2012

Brij Bhushan Bansal Vs. Union of India and Another

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Dec-21-2012

Subject : Education

that is whether the considerations which are required to be taken into account under Section 31(1)(d) of the Extradition Act, 1962 are to be examined by the Central Government prior to the issuance of an order of Magisterial Inquiry … said note verbale.3. Acting on the said note verbale, the Ministry of External Affairs passed an order on 22.04.2010, which is to the following effect:MINISTRY OF EXTERNAL AFFAIRS CPV DIVISION, EXTRADITION SECTION PATIALA HOUSE ANNEXE, TILAK MARG

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 04 2017

Rajiv Chandrakant Shah vs.union of India

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Aug-04-2017

Subject : Land Acquisition

Ministry of External Affairs vide letter dated 19.02.2002 directed for an enquiry under Section 5 of the Indian Extradition Act, 1962 regarding the allegations of commission of certain offences by the petitioner within the territory of United States of … petition has challenged the order passed after enquiry by the learned ACMM, Patiala House Courts, New Delhi dated 22.04.2017 whereby he has been committed to prison to await the orders of the Central Government for being extradited

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial