Advanced Search Results

Prem Swarup Puri Vs. Delhi Administration and Union of India

Court : Delhi

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Extradition Act, 1962 - Sections 21; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : ILR1980Delhi184

bases his claim on the mandate in Article one of the decree and section 21 of the Indian Extradition Act 1962 (the Act). The Union of India, on the other hand, contend that they are entitled to try him

Om Prakash Srivastava Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Extradition Act, 1962 - Sections 21; Constitution of India - Article 226 and 226(2); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 20 - Order 11, Rule 2

Reported in : 131(2006)DLT557(SC); JT2006(7)SC35; 2006(7)SCALE318; (2006)6SCC207; 2006(2)LC953(SC)

facing trial in eight cases which is in complete violation of the provisions of Section 21 of the Extradition Act, 1962 (in short the 'Extradition Act'). He had also pleaded that he was being kept in solitary confinement without

Daya Singh Lahoria Etc. Vs. Union of India and ors. Etc.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 - Sections 18; Extradition Act, 1962 - Sections 2 and 21; Fugitive Offenders Act, 1881; Constitution of India - Article 7

Reported in : AIR2001SC1716; 2001(1)ALD(Cri)828; 2001(2)ALT(Cri)142; 2001CriLJ2188; JT2001(5)SC31; 2001(3)SCALE370; (2001)4SCC516; [2001]3SCR1; 2001(2)LC1002(SC)

form a part of the decree in view of the specific provision contained in Section 21 of the Extradition Act, 1962.3. To consolidate and amend the law relating to the extradition of fugitive criminals and to provide for matters

Abu Salem Abdul Qayoom Ansari Vs. State of Maharashtra and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 - Sections 3(2)(i), 3(2)(ii), 3(3), 3(5), 5, 19; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 120B, 302, 307, 387, 382; Constitution of India - Article 32

Blast Case No. 1 of 1993, as violative of the Rule of Speciality and Section 21 of the Extradition Act, 1962; (d) issue a writ of Mandamus to release and discharge the writ petitioner by quashing all the proceedings

Sri R. Sadagopan Vs. Sri K. Rajaiah S/O Late Sri N. Kodandarama Naidu

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Contempt of Court

Acts : Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 - Sections 2, 12, 13 and 15(1); Companies Act; Extradition Act, 1962 - Sections 21; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 313; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 24 - Order 1, Rule 10 - Order 6, Rules 16 and 17 - Order 7, Rule 11; Constitution of India - Article 226; Contempt of Court Rules - Rule 11

Reported in : ILR2009KAR3302; 2009(6)KarLJ239

facing trial in eight cases, which is in complete violation of the provisions of Section 21 of the Extradition Act, 1962 and he had also pleaded that, he was being kept in solitary confinement without proper medical aid in

State Vs. Prem Sarup Purl

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Extradition Act, 1962 - Sections 20

Reported in : ILR1973Delhi803

this regard he may apply to the trying Magistrate. Cr. Misc. 799 of 1972 is ordered accordingly. Indian Extradition Act (1962) - Sections 20 & 21-Scope and applicability of, with respect to facts of instant case-legal position to be … of which he was accused had been committed in England. (26) SECTION. 19, on which the corresponding Indian Section 21 is modelled, reads as follows: 'WHERE,in pursuance of any arrangement with a foreign state, any person accused or

Jugal Kishore More Vs. Chief Presidency Magistrate Calcutta and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 46, 75 to 86, 186 to 189, 403, 429, 439, 514 and 555; ;Constitution of India - Articles 21, 73, 227 and 394; ;Extradition Act, 1962 - Sections 2, 3(1), 19, 35 and 37; ;Fugitive Offenders Act, 1881 - Sections 13 and 26; ;General Clauses Act, 1897 - Section 3; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 3, 4, 120B, 216, 420, 467 and 471

Reported in : AIR1968Cal220,1968CriLJ604,71CWN508

strongly contended by Mr. Dutt in the very fact that after the Supreme Court decision and beforeenactment of Extradition Act, 1962, instructions were given' as above. But his Lordship finds 'an incorrectitude' in instruction (b) just reproduced, which, to … Bijayesh Mukherjee, J. 1. This is a case laid before me under Section 439, Sub-section (1), read with Section 429, of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 5 of 1898, with the … with a covering letter, also dated July 30, 1965, and bearing No. 2175, over the signature of the Magistrate, to the Secretary to the Government

Om Prakash Srivastava Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Extradition Act, 1962 - Sections 19 and 21; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 354A, 387 and 120B

Reported in : 112(2004)DLT125

the petitioner has been extradited can be proceeded with in view of Sections 19 and 21 of the Extradition Act, 1962 as amended in 1993 (for short 'the Act'). Counsel for the State contended that the stand taken by … maintainable as the same does not fall within the ambit of 'fugitive criminal' as defined in the Act. Section 21 of the Act, on which reliance is placed by the petitioner, has no application.4. I have heard Counsels

Jayendra Vishnu Thakur Vs. State of Maharashtra and anr.

Court : Orissa

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 2009(II)OLR161

so expressly or the same must be capable of being inferred by necessary implication.There are statutes like the Extradition Act, 1962 which excludes taking of evidence viz-a-viz opinion. (See - Sarabjit Rick Singh v. Union of India : (2008) … Amar Bose : (1990) 1 SCC 234 this Court held:12. We have no doubt that the language of Section 21 of the Act clearly forbids the Controller from embarking on an enquiry beyond the ambit of Section 21

Suri Prem Kumar and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi), Ministry of Home Af ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 - Sections 13(1) and 13(2); Extradition Act, 1962; Constitution of India - Articles 1, 14 and 21; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 120B, 420, 467, 468 and 471; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 5, 82, 93, 105, 105B, 105(1), 105(2), 177, 188 and 190

Reported in : 2010(1)ALT354

got issued Red Corner Notice by the Interpol against the petitioners on 07-12-2001 and initiated proceedings, under the Extradition Act, 1962, (for brevity 'the Act 34 of 1962'), to extradite them. Subsequently, the petitioners were arrested at USA and … or on facts, and as such grossly violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India, and to set them free, and pass … of the CBI, BSFC, Bangalore, the 2nd respondent in not complying with the mandatory provisions of law viz., Section 105 and Section 105B Cri.P.C. as relates these petitioners herein, and by not serving summons or process on