Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: extradition act 1962 section 20 · Page 1 of about 97 results (0.027 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jan 22 1973

State Vs. Prem Sarup Purl

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-22-1973

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Extradition Act, 1962 - Sections 20

Reported in : ILR1973Delhi803

this regard he may apply to the trying Magistrate. Cr. Misc. 799 of 1972 is ordered accordingly. Indian Extradition Act (1962) - Sections 20 & 21-Scope and applicability of, with respect to facts of instant case-legal position to be … expiration of fifteen days from the date of his being committed to prison by the magistrate.'(39) According to Section 20, thereforee, when once a person is brought to India after being delivered to the proper authority by a

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 24 2006

Om Prakash Srivastava Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jul-24-2006

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Extradition Act, 1962 - Sections 21; Constitution of India - Article 226 and 226(2); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 20 - Order 11, Rule 2

Reported in : 131(2006)DLT557(SC); JT2006(7)SC35; 2006(7)SCALE318; (2006)6SCC207; 2006(2)LC953(SC)

facing trial in eight cases which is in complete violation of the provisions of Section 21 of the Extradition Act, 1962 (in short the 'Extradition Act'). He had also pleaded that he was being kept in solitary confinement without … Dekor Ltd. v. Subhash Himatlal Desai and Ors. : (1994)6SCC322 ).In a generic and wide sense (as in Section 20 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908) 'cause of action' means every fact, which it is necessary to establish

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 08 2019

Lennox James Ellis vs.union of India

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-08-2019

Subject : Land Acquisition

August‟ 2016, issued by the Respondent W.P.(CRL) No.3432/ 2017 Page 1 of 45 under Section 5 of the Extradition Act1962 seeking an inquiry by the Court of the Ld. Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate 01, Patiala House Courts, New … IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI * % + W.P.(CRL) No.3432/ 2017 Judgment reserved on: Judgment delivered on:03. 10.2018 08 .01.2019 LENNOX JAMES ELLIS ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Sumeet Verma,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Sep 21 2015

Verhoeven, Marie-Emmanuelle Vs. Union of India Through Ministry of Ext ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Sep-21-2015

Subject : Right to Information

dated 24.02.2015 of the Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Patiala House Courts, New Delhi under Section 34-B of the Extradition Act, 1962. Thereafter, accepting the extradition request dated 24.03.2015 made by the Republic of Chile, by order dated 18.05.2015 the … Great Britain and Ireland was not shown in the list of treaties and arrangements in operation as on 20.11.2013 declared on the website of Ministry of External Affairs;(f) since the Notification as required under Section 3(3) of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 28 2016

Verhoeven, Marie-Emmanuelle Vs. Union of India and Ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-28-2016

Subject : Right to Information

order is purported to have been issued in exercise of powers conferred by Section 4(1) of the Indian Extradition Act, 1962. Section 4(1) has no relevance to the context. What is relevant is Section 3(1) of the Act. The third … Section 3(3)]. of the Act. Apparently realizing this, the Government of India notified an Order dated 28th April, 2015 (gazetted on 29th April, 2015) under Section 3(1) read with Section 3(3) of the Act making the Act

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 10 2010

Abu Salem Abdul Qayoom Ansari Vs. State of Maharashtra and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-10-2010

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 - Sections 3(2)(i), 3(2)(ii), 3(3), 3(5), 5, 19; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 120B, 302, 307, 387, 382; Constitution of India - Article 32

Blast Case No. 1 of 1993, as violative of the Rule of Speciality and Section 21 of the Extradition Act, 1962; (d) issue a writ of Mandamus to release and discharge the writ petitioner by quashing all the proceedings … he can be tried only for the offences mentioned in the extradition decree.2) Criminal Appeal No. 990 of 2006, filed under Section 19 of the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 (hereinafter referred to as "the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 11 2012

State of Nct of Delhi Vs. Abu Salem Abdul Qayoom Ansari

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-11-2012

Subject : Land Acquisition

here since there was no Extradition Treaty between the two countries, by virtue of Section 21 of the Extradition Act, 1962 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Act’), a Notification, extending the applicability of the Act to the Republic of … 16.8.2007, sanction under Section 23(2) of MCOCA was granted by the competent authority to prosecute the respondent/accused. On 20.8.2007, a Supplementary Charge-sheet against the respondent/accused was filed before the Designated Court in the present case. After filing

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 09 2017

Omesh Chander Kashyap vs.union of India

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Aug-09-2017

Subject : Land Acquisition

Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate vide order dated 31.03.2015, after a full fledged enquiry under Section 7 of the Extradition Act, 1962 (hereinafter called as „Act‟) recommended for the extradition of the petitioner to Canada, the requesting State. The W.P(Crl.) … foreign State may, by notified order, add or omit any offence from the list given in the Schedule.” 20. The purpose of an inquiry under Section 7 of the Act is only to determine whether there is

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 14 2014

Joseph Palanivel Jeyapaul Vs. Union of India

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Nov-14-2014

Subject : Land Acquisition

petition, it is mentioned that the Petitioner filed a representation dated 01.09.2014 in terms of Section 7(4) of Extradition Act, 1962 to the Government of India seeking his discharge but no communication has been received by the Petitioner in … after the offense was reported to law enforcement authorities. The Complaint charges offenses occurring during all fall of 2004. Since the Complaint was originally filed on December, 15, 2006 prosecution is not barred by the applicable statute

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 16 2026

Kanwarjeet Singh Batth vs Union of India

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-16-2026

Subject : Criminal

by Amritsar Police, the Petitioner was sent to judicial custody on 22.10.2014.8. As per Section 34(b)(2) of the Extradition Act, 1962 any fugitivearrested under sub-section (1), is entitled to be discharged if no request for his Surrender or Return … * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Reserved on: 08th October, 2025 Pronounced on: 16th March, 2026 + W.P.(CRL) 1188/2019, CRL.M.A. 8679/2019, CRL.M.A. CRL.M.(BAIL) 6270/2020 & CRL.M.(BAIL) 749/2021 KANWARJEET SINGH

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial