Advanced Search Results

Narendra Gudgud Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation (Eow)

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Section 13(1) and 13(2); ;Provisions of the Extradition Act, 1962 - Sections 19 and 36; ;Copyright Act; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 120B and 420; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Section 75; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 70, 77, 78, 79 and 482; ;Indian Law; ;Constitution of India - Articles 2, 9, 10 and 12

Reported in : 2009CriLJ4278

also illegal.5. Mr. Basu then takes me to different provisions of the Extradition Act, 1962 and pin points Section 19 occurring in Chapter IV of the Act:19. Mode of requisition or form of warrant for the surrender or … but is now in the USA the judiciary does not have any role to play. Provisions of the Extradition Act, 1962 and the Extradition Treaty between the USA and India would clearly reveal that the extradition proceedings can only

Om Prakash Srivastava Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Extradition Act, 1962 - Sections 19 and 21; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 354A, 387 and 120B

Reported in : 112(2004)DLT125

the petitioner has been extradited can be proceeded with in view of Sections 19 and 21 of the Extradition Act, 1962 as amended in 1993 (for short 'the Act'). Counsel for the State contended that the stand taken by … from the Republic of Singapore in the year 1995. He has been in judicial custody. A case under Sections 364-A, 387 and 120B, IPC was registered against him vide FIR No. 33/2003 on the basis of a

Omesh Chander Kashyap vs.union of India

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate vide order dated 31.03.2015, after a full fledged enquiry under Section 7 of the Extradition Act, 1962 (hereinafter called as „Act‟) recommended for the extradition of the petitioner to Canada, the requesting State. The W.P(Crl.) … Metropolitan Magistrate vide order dated 31.03.2015, after a full fledged enquiry under Section 7 of the Extradition Act, 1962 (hereinafter called as „Act‟) recommended for the extradition of the petitioner to Canada, the requesting State. The W.P(Crl.)

Abu Salem Abdul Qayoom Ansari Vs. State of Maharashtra and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 - Sections 3(2)(i), 3(2)(ii), 3(3), 3(5), 5, 19; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 120B, 302, 307, 387, 382; Constitution of India - Article 32

Blast Case No. 1 of 1993, as violative of the Rule of Speciality and Section 21 of the Extradition Act, 1962; (d) issue a writ of Mandamus to release and discharge the writ petitioner by quashing all the proceedings … tried only for the offences mentioned in the extradition decree.2) Criminal Appeal No. 990 of 2006, filed under Section 19 of the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 (hereinafter referred to as "the TADA Act"), arose out

Jugal Kishore More Vs. Chief Presidency Magistrate Calcutta and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 46, 75 to 86, 186 to 189, 403, 429, 439, 514 and 555; ;Constitution of India - Articles 21, 73, 227 and 394; ;Extradition Act, 1962 - Sections 2, 3(1), 19, 35 and 37; ;Fugitive Offenders Act, 1881 - Sections 13 and 26; ;General Clauses Act, 1897 - Section 3; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 3, 4, 120B, 216, 420, 467 and 471

Reported in : AIR1968Cal220,1968CriLJ604,71CWN508

strongly contended by Mr. Dutt in the very fact that after the Supreme Court decision and beforeenactment of Extradition Act, 1962, instructions were given' as above. But his Lordship finds 'an incorrectitude' in instruction (b) just reproduced, which, to … Parliament. In absence of such notified order, it is not for the Central Government to call in aid Section 19 of Chapter IV and to make a requisition to Hong Kong for surrender of More, as it has

Aman Vyas vs.union of India

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

fugitive from India to a foreign country or vice versa is governed by the provisions of the Indian Extradition Act, 1962. Thus contention of learned counsel for the petitioner at this stage that since no charge-sheet has been filed … motion by way of a requisition and no reference is made to a charge or an indictment. Furthermore, Section 19 in Chapter IV of the Extradition Act does not talk of a charge but only an accusation of

Verhoeven, Marie-Emmanuelle Vs. Union of India and Ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Right to Information

order is purported to have been issued in exercise of powers conferred by Section 4(1) of the Indian Extradition Act, 1962. Section 4(1) has no relevance to the context. What is relevant is Section 3(1) of the Act. The third … consideration is whether there is a binding extradition treaty in terms of Section 2(d) of the Extradition Act, 1962 between India and Chile. Our answer to this question is in the affirmative.3. The subsidiary question, equally important,

Srinivasa Rao Kumbhari Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 363

Reported in : 1995(2)ALT210; 1996CriLJ353

363 of the I.P.C., an extradition offence within the meaning of Clause (c) of S. 2 of the Extradition Act, 1962 as amended by the Extradition (Amendment) Act, 1993 (No. 66 of 1993). He must, therefore, be extradited to … to criminal contempt within the meaning of S. 2(c)(ii) and (iii) of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971. Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act confers jurisdiction on this Court to enquire into or try a … surgically by Dr. Michael K. Morgan at Sydney in Australia in August, 1991 and for a second surgery, she was taken to the United States

Jayendra Vishnu Thakur Vs. State of Maharashtra and anr.

Court : Orissa

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 2009(II)OLR161

so expressly or the same must be capable of being inferred by necessary implication.There are statutes like the Extradition Act, 1962 which excludes taking of evidence viz-a-viz opinion. (See - Sarabjit Rick Singh v. Union of India : (2008) … S.B. Sinha, J.1. Leave granted.2. Interpretation of the provisions of Section 299 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short 'the Code'), Section 33 of the Indian Evidence … of the provisions of Section 299 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short 'the Code'), Section 33 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1871

Bhavesh Jayanti Lakhani Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Extradition Act, 1962 - Sections 2, 3, 5, 6, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 29 and 34B; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 41, 41(1), 105A to 105L and 154; Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946 - Sections 3, 5; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) (Amendment) Act, 1993; Foreigners Act; Delhi Special Police Ordinance, 1946; Police Act, 1861; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 13 and 44A; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 363, 363A, 365 and 368; Punjab Police Rules; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19, 21, 32, 73 and 226; Madhya Pradesh Police Regulations

Reported in : 2009(5)LHSC2857; JT2009(11)SC279; 2009(11)SCALE467; (2009)9SCC551; 2009AIRSCW6309

there shall be no order as to costs. - Interpol Notice: [S.B. Sinha & Dr. Mukundakam Sharma, JJ] Extradition Act, 1962, Section 6, 16, 34-B and 15 - Matrimonial Dispute - Whether the CBI established under the DPSE Act has … the roles and responsibilities of the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) vis--vis the provisions of the Extradition Act, 1962 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') is involved in this appeal. It arises out of a judgment and