Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: extradition act 1962 section 18 · Page 1 of about 91 results (0.026 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Apr 17 2001

Daya Singh Lahoria Etc. Vs. Union of India and ors. Etc.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-17-2001

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 - Sections 18; Extradition Act, 1962 - Sections 2 and 21; Fugitive Offenders Act, 1881; Constitution of India - Article 7

Reported in : AIR2001SC1716; 2001(1)ALD(Cri)828; 2001(2)ALT(Cri)142; 2001CriLJ2188; JT2001(5)SC31; 2001(3)SCALE370; (2001)4SCC516; [2001]3SCR1; 2001(2)LC1002(SC)

form a part of the decree in view of the specific provision contained in Section 21 of the Extradition Act, 1962.3. To consolidate and amend the law relating to the extradition of fugitive criminals and to provide for matters … Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987, on the ground that an objection to the said jurisdiction could be made under Section 18 of the Act before the very Designated Court and an application for issuance of a Writ of Habeas

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 10 2010

Abu Salem Abdul Qayoom Ansari Vs. State of Maharashtra and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-10-2010

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 - Sections 3(2)(i), 3(2)(ii), 3(3), 3(5), 5, 19; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 120B, 302, 307, 387, 382; Constitution of India - Article 32

Blast Case No. 1 of 1993, as violative of the Rule of Speciality and Section 21 of the Extradition Act, 1962; (d) issue a writ of Mandamus to release and discharge the writ petitioner by quashing all the proceedings … Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 (hereinafter referred to as "the TADA Act"), arose out of framing of charge on 18.03.2006 against the appellant by the Designated Court at Arthur Road Jail, Mumbai in RC No.1(S/93)/CBI/STF known as Bombay

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 12 2008

Ram K. Mahbubani Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Sep-12-2008

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Extradition Act, 1962 - Sections 2, 3, 3(3), 4 to 11, 5, 6, 12 to 18, 24, 34, 34B and 1343; Extradition Act, 1870; Fugitive Offenders Act, 1881; Extradition Act, 1903; Bare Act; Extradition (Amendment) Act, 1993 - Sections 8; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 228; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 415, 417 and 420; Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908

Reported in : 153(2008)DLT471; 2008(106)DRJ906

issuance of a writ of Habeas Corpus securing the release of the Petitioner under Section 24 of the Extradition Act, 1962 ('Extradition Act' for short); secondly, for quashing of the Orders of the learned ACMM dated 31.5.2007 and 28.7.2007 … await his return. The Magistrate is also obligated to send a Certificate of Committal to the Central Government. Section 18 empowers the Central Government to issue a warrant for custody and removal to the foreign state concerned of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Apr 08 2026

Christian Michel James vs Union of India and Ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Apr-08-2026

Subject : Right to Information

sections into the chargesheet filed against a fugitive Extradited from UAE, Ultra virus of Section 21 of the Extradition Act 1962.Digitally Signed WP(Crl) 3868/2025 Page 1 of 19b) Issue appropriate Writ order direction declaring that non application of the … registered RC No. 217-2013-A-0003 dated 12.03.2013 under Section 120B read with Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter referred to „IPC‟) and Sections 7, 8, 9, 12, 13(2) and 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 11 2012

State of Nct of Delhi Vs. Abu Salem Abdul Qayoom Ansari

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-11-2012

Subject : Land Acquisition

here since there was no Extradition Treaty between the two countries, by virtue of Section 21 of the Extradition Act, 1962 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Act’), a Notification, extending the applicability of the Act to the Republic of … with the Trial. Presently, the said case is stated to be at the stage of arguments. 3. On 18.9.2002, the respondent, Abu Salem Abdul Qayoom Ansari was detained at Lisbon in Portugal, as he was found in

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 21 2015

Verhoeven, Marie-Emmanuelle Vs. Union of India Through Ministry of Ext ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Sep-21-2015

Subject : Right to Information

dated 24.02.2015 of the Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Patiala House Courts, New Delhi under Section 34-B of the Extradition Act, 1962. Thereafter, accepting the extradition request dated 24.03.2015 made by the Republic of Chile, by order dated 18.05.2015 the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 11 2009

Jayendra Vishnu Thakur Vs. State of Maharashtra and anr.

Court : Orissa

Decided on : May-11-2009

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 2009(II)OLR161

so expressly or the same must be capable of being inferred by necessary implication.There are statutes like the Extradition Act, 1962 which excludes taking of evidence viz-a-viz opinion. (See - Sarabjit Rick Singh v. Union of India : (2008) … S.B. Sinha, J.1. Leave granted.2. Interpretation of the provisions of Section 299 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short 'the Code'), Section 33 of the Indian Evidence … 1973 (for short 'the Code'), Section 33 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1871 as also Section 14(5) of the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 17 2012

Niranjan Patel Vs. Uoi

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Apr-17-2012

Subject : Land Acquisition

passed by the learned Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate-01, Patiala House Courts, New Delhi under Section 5 of the Extradition Act, 1962 in CC. No.79/1/08 whereby the learned Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate recommended extradition of the Petitioner to the United … that on 29th June, 2007, the Petitioner was convicted by a Court in USA for offence under Title 18 US Code, Section 371, conspiracy to defraud the US, 18 USC Section 1546(a), immigration fraud and misuse of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 16 2026

Kanwarjeet Singh Batth vs Union of India

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-16-2026

Subject : Criminal

by Amritsar Police, the Petitioner was sent to judicial custody on 22.10.2014.8. As per Section 34(b)(2) of the Extradition Act, 1962 any fugitivearrested under sub-section (1), is entitled to be discharged if no request for his Surrender or Return … India and the statements of UK Officers, can be recorded through video conferencing.29. CW-1 in his cross-examination dated 18.05.2017, stated that therequest for Provisional Arrest of FC, Ex.CW-1/2 dated 06.12.2012 along with the enclosures, was made. He

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 05 2004

Pragnesh Desai Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Feb-05-2004

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 21, 226 and 227

Reported in : 2004(109)AWC899; 2004(73)DRJ84

23 October 2003, passed by the Government of India, against the petitioner under Section 5 of the Indian Extradition Act, 1962 (for short 'the Act') and to his continued judicial custody. 2. The factual background, on which the foundation … obtaining a $ 1 Million life insurance policy on the life of Leona Swiderski, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Sections 1343 and 2. The Magistrate Judge also issued a warrant for the arrest of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial