Advanced Search Results

Bhavesh Jayanti Lakhani Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Extradition Act, 1962 - Sections 2, 3, 5, 6, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 29 and 34B; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 41, 41(1), 105A to 105L and 154; Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946 - Sections 3, 5; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) (Amendment) Act, 1993; Foreigners Act; Delhi Special Police Ordinance, 1946; Police Act, 1861; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 13 and 44A; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 363, 363A, 365 and 368; Punjab Police Rules; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19, 21, 32, 73 and 226; Madhya Pradesh Police Regulations

Reported in : 2009(5)LHSC2857; JT2009(11)SC279; 2009(11)SCALE467; (2009)9SCC551; 2009AIRSCW6309

there shall be no order as to costs. - Interpol Notice: [S.B. Sinha & Dr. Mukundakam Sharma, JJ] Extradition Act, 1962, Section 6, 16, 34-B and 15 - Matrimonial Dispute - Whether the CBI established under the DPSE Act has

State of Nct of Delhi Vs. Abu Salem Abdul Qayoom Ansari

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

here since there was no Extradition Treaty between the two countries, by virtue of Section 21 of the Extradition Act, 1962 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Act’), a Notification, extending the applicability of the Act to the Republic of … 1.6.2007, a formal arrest of the respondent/accused in respect of the present FIR No.88/2002 was shown. 6. On 16.8.2007, sanction under Section 23(2) of MCOCA was granted by the competent authority to prosecute the respondent/accused. On 20.8.2007,

Flemming LudIn Larsen Vs. Union of India

Court : Delhi

Subject : Narcotics

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Extradition Act, 1962 - Sections 5 and 7(1); Narcotic Drugs Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 36-A

Reported in : 1999IVAD(Delhi)447; 1999CriLJ3114; 80(1999)DLT324; 1999(50)DRJ507

New Delhi, to issue a provisional warrant for the arrest of the petitioner under section 34B(1) of the Extradition ACt, 1962 (for short 'the Act). Acceding to the request the learned A.C.M.M, New Delhi, on August 12, 1997 issued … of Florida. Following the negotiations the petitioner delivered one kg. of cocaine to the undercover detectives on August 16, 1991 with the understanding that another kg. would be delivered to them within ten minutes. The petitioner and

Abu Salem Abdul Qayoom Ansari Vs. State of Maharashtra and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 - Sections 3(2)(i), 3(2)(ii), 3(3), 3(5), 5, 19; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 120B, 302, 307, 387, 382; Constitution of India - Article 32

Blast Case No. 1 of 1993, as violative of the Rule of Speciality and Section 21 of the Extradition Act, 1962; (d) issue a writ of Mandamus to release and discharge the writ petitioner by quashing all the proceedings … the Bombay Bomb Blast Case.3) The appellant filed Criminal Appeal Nos. 1142-1143 of 2007 against the order dated 16.04.2007 by the same Designated Court, framing charges against him under Sections 120B, 302, 307, 387, 382 IPC and

Sri R. Sadagopan Vs. Sri K. Rajaiah S/O Late Sri N. Kodandarama Naidu

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Contempt of Court

Acts : Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 - Sections 2, 12, 13 and 15(1); Companies Act; Extradition Act, 1962 - Sections 21; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 313; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 24 - Order 1, Rule 10 - Order 6, Rules 16 and 17 - Order 7, Rule 11; Constitution of India - Article 226; Contempt of Court Rules - Rule 11

Reported in : ILR2009KAR3302; 2009(6)KarLJ239

facing trial in eight cases, which is in complete violation of the provisions of Section 21 of the Extradition Act, 1962 and he had also pleaded that, he was being kept in solitary confinement without proper medical aid in … very slight, which may be appreciated with reference to the impact of the provisions in Order 6 Rule 16 of C.P.C in general and Sub-clause (c) in particular, which enables the court, at any stage of the

Rajiv Chandrakant Shah vs.union of India

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

argued that the arrest of the petitioner was in violation of the provisions of Section 34- B and Section 16 of the Extradition Act, 1962. Be that as it may, it W.P(Crl.) 1831/2017 Page 7 of 16 was … Ministry of External Affairs vide letter dated 19.02.2002 directed for an enquiry under Section 5 of the Indian Extradition Act, 1962 regarding the allegations of commission of certain offences by the petitioner within the territory of United States of

Omesh Chander Kashyap vs.union of India

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate vide order dated 31.03.2015, after a full fledged enquiry under Section 7 of the Extradition Act, 1962 (hereinafter called as „Act‟) recommended for the extradition of the petitioner to Canada, the requesting State. The W.P(Crl.) … criminal and for his delivery at a place and to a person to be named in the warrant.” 16. Section 10 of the Act deals with the material which could be received in evidence by the enquiry

State of Punjab and ors. Vs. Sadhu Ram

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Property

Reported in : JT1996(7)SC118; 1996(5)SCALE577; (1997)9SCC544; [1996]Supp4SCR41

owners and earstwhile owners not entitled for possession. - Interpol Notice: [S.B. Sinha & Dr. Mukundakam Sharma, JJ] Extradition Act, 1962, Section 6, 16, 34-B and 15 - Matrimonial Dispute - Whether the CBI established under the DPSE Act has

Verhoeven, Marie-Emmanuelle Vs. Union of India and Ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Right to Information

order is purported to have been issued in exercise of powers conferred by Section 4(1) of the Indian Extradition Act, 1962. Section 4(1) has no relevance to the context. What is relevant is Section 3(1) of the Act. The third … if no request for his surrender or return is received within the said period.” 27. On or about 16th March, 1956 (well before the Extradition Act, 1962) came into force, an unstarred question No.439 was raised in

Verhoeven, Marie-Emmanuelle Vs. Union of India Through Ministry of Ext ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Right to Information

dated 24.02.2015 of the Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Patiala House Courts, New Delhi under Section 34-B of the Extradition Act, 1962. Thereafter, accepting the extradition request dated 24.03.2015 made by the Republic of Chile, by order dated 18.05.2015 the … the petitioner was made by the Republic of Chile through its Embassy vide Note Verbale No.43/2015 dated 24.03.2015. 16. In pursuance thereof, the order dated 18.05.2015 has been passed by the Union of India, Ministry of External