Advanced Search Results

Bhavesh Jayanti Lakhani Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Extradition Act, 1962 - Sections 2, 3, 5, 6, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 29 and 34B; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 41, 41(1), 105A to 105L and 154; Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946 - Sections 3, 5; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) (Amendment) Act, 1993; Foreigners Act; Delhi Special Police Ordinance, 1946; Police Act, 1861; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 13 and 44A; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 363, 363A, 365 and 368; Punjab Police Rules; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19, 21, 32, 73 and 226; Madhya Pradesh Police Regulations

Reported in : 2009(5)LHSC2857; JT2009(11)SC279; 2009(11)SCALE467; (2009)9SCC551; 2009AIRSCW6309

there shall be no order as to costs. - Interpol Notice: [S.B. Sinha & Dr. Mukundakam Sharma, JJ] Extradition Act, 1962, Section 6, 16, 34-B and 15 - Matrimonial Dispute - Whether the CBI established under the DPSE Act has

Ram K. Mahbubani Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Extradition Act, 1962 - Sections 2, 3, 3(3), 4 to 11, 5, 6, 12 to 18, 24, 34, 34B and 1343; Extradition Act, 1870; Fugitive Offenders Act, 1881; Extradition Act, 1903; Bare Act; Extradition (Amendment) Act, 1993 - Sections 8; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 228; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 415, 417 and 420; Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908

Reported in : 153(2008)DLT471; 2008(106)DRJ906

issuance of a writ of Habeas Corpus securing the release of the Petitioner under Section 24 of the Extradition Act, 1962 ('Extradition Act' for short); secondly, for quashing of the Orders of the learned ACMM dated 31.5.2007 and 28.7.2007 … Sri Lankan passport and for his discharge under Section 24 of the Extradition Act. In its Order dated 15.11.2006 a learned Single Judge of the High Court of Judicature of Madras noted that the case had been

Sri R. Sadagopan Vs. Sri K. Rajaiah S/O Late Sri N. Kodandarama Naidu

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Contempt of Court

Acts : Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 - Sections 2, 12, 13 and 15(1); Companies Act; Extradition Act, 1962 - Sections 21; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 313; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 24 - Order 1, Rule 10 - Order 6, Rules 16 and 17 - Order 7, Rule 11; Constitution of India - Article 226; Contempt of Court Rules - Rule 11

Reported in : ILR2009KAR3302; 2009(6)KarLJ239

facing trial in eight cases, which is in complete violation of the provisions of Section 21 of the Extradition Act, 1962 and he had also pleaded that, he was being kept in solitary confinement without proper medical aid in … ORDERA.N. Venugopala Gowda, J.1. This is a petition filed under Section 2(c)(iii) and 12 read with Section 15(1)(b) of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 ('the Act' for short), to initiate Criminal Contempt of Court proceedings

Srinivasa Rao Kumbhari Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 363

Reported in : 1995(2)ALT210; 1996CriLJ353

363 of the I.P.C., an extradition offence within the meaning of Clause (c) of S. 2 of the Extradition Act, 1962 as amended by the Extradition (Amendment) Act, 1993 (No. 66 of 1993). He must, therefore, be extradited to … committed by petitioner amounts to criminal contempt - suo motu cognizance of contempt committed by petitioner taken under Section 15 (1) of Contempt of Courts Act read with Rule 5 (a) of Contempt of Courts Rule framed by

Yatindra Kumar Aggarwal and Another Vs. Union of India and Another

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

that is whether the considerations which are required to be taken into account under Section 31(1)(d) of the Extradition Act, 1962 are to be examined by the Central Government prior to the issuance of an order of Magisterial Inquiry … THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:21. 12.2012 W.P. (CRL) 1530/2010 BRIJ BHUSHAN BANSAL Petitioner Versus UNION OF INDIA & ANOTHER Respondents WITH + W.P. (CRL) 1531/2010 YATINDRA KUMAR

Himanshu Kulshrestha Vs. Union of India and Another

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

that is whether the considerations which are required to be taken into account under Section 31(1)(d) of the Extradition Act, 1962 are to be examined by the Central Government prior to the issuance of an order of Magisterial Inquiry … THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:21. 12.2012 W.P. (CRL) 1530/2010 BRIJ BHUSHAN BANSAL Petitioner Versus UNION OF INDIA & ANOTHER Respondents WITH + W.P. (CRL) 1531/2010 YATINDRA KUMAR

Brij Bhushan Bansal Vs. Union of India and Another

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

that is whether the considerations which are required to be taken into account under Section 31(1)(d) of the Extradition Act, 1962 are to be examined by the Central Government prior to the issuance of an order of Magisterial Inquiry … THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:21. 12.2012 W.P. (CRL) 1530/2010 BRIJ BHUSHAN BANSAL Petitioner Versus UNION OF INDIA & ANOTHER Respondents WITH + W.P. (CRL) 1531/2010 YATINDRA KUMAR

Lennox James Ellis vs.union of India

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

August‟ 2016, issued by the Respondent W.P.(CRL) No.3432/ 2017 Page 1 of 45 under Section 5 of the Extradition Act‟ 1962 seeking an inquiry by the Court of the Ld. Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate 01, Patiala House Courts, New … Levy [17 Ch Div 746, at p. 756]. . If the purpose of the statutory fiction mentioned in Section 15 is kept in view, then it follows that the purpose of that fiction would be completely defeated if

Verhoeven, Marie-Emmanuelle Vs. Union of India and Ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Right to Information

order is purported to have been issued in exercise of powers conferred by Section 4(1) of the Indian Extradition Act, 1962. Section 4(1) has no relevance to the context. What is relevant is Section 3(1) of the Act. The third … agreement duly made between the Dominion of India and the Dominion of Pakistan and came into effect from 15th August, 1947.[1]. The Order provides, inter alia, that the rights and obligations under all international agreements to which

Verhoeven, Marie-Emmanuelle Vs. Union of India Through Ministry of Ext ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Right to Information

dated 24.02.2015 of the Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Patiala House Courts, New Delhi under Section 34-B of the Extradition Act, 1962. Thereafter, accepting the extradition request dated 24.03.2015 made by the Republic of Chile, by order dated 18.05.2015 the … criminals, and includes any treaty [agreement or arrangement] relating to the extradition of fugitive criminals made before the 15th day of August, 1947, which extends to, and is binding on, India.(f) fugitive criminal means a person who