Advanced Search Results

Ram K. Mahbubani Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Extradition Act, 1962 - Sections 2, 3, 3(3), 4 to 11, 5, 6, 12 to 18, 24, 34, 34B and 1343; Extradition Act, 1870; Fugitive Offenders Act, 1881; Extradition Act, 1903; Bare Act; Extradition (Amendment) Act, 1993 - Sections 8; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 228; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 415, 417 and 420; Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908

Reported in : 153(2008)DLT471; 2008(106)DRJ906

issuance of a writ of Habeas Corpus securing the release of the Petitioner under Section 24 of the Extradition Act, 1962 ('Extradition Act' for short); secondly, for quashing of the Orders of the learned ACMM dated 31.5.2007 and 28.7.2007 … deals with the applicability of Chapter-III and not Chapter-II, along with the other provisions of the Extradition Act. Section 13 provides for the apprehension and return of a fugitive criminal to the requesting foreign state on the strength

Abu Salem Abdul Qayoom Ansari Vs. State of Maharashtra and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 - Sections 3(2)(i), 3(2)(ii), 3(3), 3(5), 5, 19; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 120B, 302, 307, 387, 382; Constitution of India - Article 32

Blast Case No. 1 of 1993, as violative of the Rule of Speciality and Section 21 of the Extradition Act, 1962; (d) issue a writ of Mandamus to release and discharge the writ petitioner by quashing all the proceedings … Mumbai in RC No.1(S/93)/CBI/STF known as Bombay Bomb Blast Case No. 1 of 1993 and the order dated 13.06.2006 passed by the said Court separating the trial of the accused/appellant from the main trial in the Bombay

Sri R. Sadagopan Vs. Sri K. Rajaiah S/O Late Sri N. Kodandarama Naidu

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Contempt of Court

Acts : Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 - Sections 2, 12, 13 and 15(1); Companies Act; Extradition Act, 1962 - Sections 21; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 313; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 24 - Order 1, Rule 10 - Order 6, Rules 16 and 17 - Order 7, Rule 11; Constitution of India - Article 226; Contempt of Court Rules - Rule 11

Reported in : ILR2009KAR3302; 2009(6)KarLJ239

facing trial in eight cases, which is in complete violation of the provisions of Section 21 of the Extradition Act, 1962 and he had also pleaded that, he was being kept in solitary confinement without proper medical aid in … reliefs and hence the proceedings initiated are liable to be dropped. Learned Counsel also invited our attention to Section 13 of the Act and contended that, even if it is construed that, the accused has committed contempt, it

Bhavesh Jayanti Lakhani Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Extradition Act, 1962 - Sections 2, 3, 5, 6, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 29 and 34B; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 41, 41(1), 105A to 105L and 154; Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946 - Sections 3, 5; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) (Amendment) Act, 1993; Foreigners Act; Delhi Special Police Ordinance, 1946; Police Act, 1861; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 13 and 44A; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 363, 363A, 365 and 368; Punjab Police Rules; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19, 21, 32, 73 and 226; Madhya Pradesh Police Regulations

Reported in : 2009(5)LHSC2857; JT2009(11)SC279; 2009(11)SCALE467; (2009)9SCC551; 2009AIRSCW6309

there shall be no order as to costs. - Interpol Notice: [S.B. Sinha & Dr. Mukundakam Sharma, JJ] Extradition Act, 1962, Section 6, 16, 34-B and 15 - Matrimonial Dispute - Whether the CBI established under the DPSE Act has … No. 6 having moved the Family Court for custody of the child by invoking the provisions contained in Section 13 of the Code of Civil Procedure, it could not have acted, relying on or on the basis of

Jugal Kishore More Vs. Chief Presidency Magistrate Calcutta and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 46, 75 to 86, 186 to 189, 403, 429, 439, 514 and 555; ;Constitution of India - Articles 21, 73, 227 and 394; ;Extradition Act, 1962 - Sections 2, 3(1), 19, 35 and 37; ;Fugitive Offenders Act, 1881 - Sections 13 and 26; ;General Clauses Act, 1897 - Section 3; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 3, 4, 120B, 216, 420, 467 and 471

Reported in : AIR1968Cal220,1968CriLJ604,71CWN508

strongly contended by Mr. Dutt in the very fact that after the Supreme Court decision and beforeenactment of Extradition Act, 1962, instructions were given' as above. But his Lordship finds 'an incorrectitude' in instruction (b) just reproduced, which, to … 19G5, by Magistrate D. Cons of the Central Magistracy, Hong Kong, to the Hong Kong Police 'Pursuant to Section 13 of Part II and Section 26 of Part of the Fugitive Offenders Act, 1881', the last two paragraphs

State of West Bengal Vs. Jugal Kishore More and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Fugitive Offenders Act, 1881; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 120B, 121, 121A, 122, 123, 420, 467 and 471; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 82 and 439; Extradition Act, 1962; Constitution of India - Article 227

Reported in : AIR1969SC1171; 1969CriLJ1559; (1969)1SCC440; [1969]3SCR320

of India was also without authority in the absence of a notified order Under Section 3 of the Extradition Act, 1962, and the High Court could not ignore the 'laws of the land, even to support a gesture of … the warrant. The Central Magistrate, Hong Kong, endorsed the warrant and directed the Hong Kong Police, 'pursuant to Section 13 of Part II and Section 26 of Part IV of the Fugitive Offenders Act, 1881', to arrest More.

Narendra Gudgud Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation (Eow)

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Section 13(1) and 13(2); ;Provisions of the Extradition Act, 1962 - Sections 19 and 36; ;Copyright Act; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 120B and 420; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Section 75; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 70, 77, 78, 79 and 482; ;Indian Law; ;Constitution of India - Articles 2, 9, 10 and 12

Reported in : 2009CriLJ4278

but is now in the USA the judiciary does not have any role to play. Provisions of the Extradition Act, 1962 and the Extradition Treaty between the USA and India would clearly reveal that the extradition proceedings can only … ORDERPartha Sakha Datta, J.1. The petitioner who is an accused in Special Case No. 02 of 2001 under Section 120B read with Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code and under Section 13(1)(d) and Section 13(2) of

Suri Prem Kumar and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi), Ministry of Home Af ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 - Sections 13(1) and 13(2); Extradition Act, 1962; Constitution of India - Articles 1, 14 and 21; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 120B, 420, 467, 468 and 471; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 5, 82, 93, 105, 105B, 105(1), 105(2), 177, 188 and 190

Reported in : 2010(1)ALT354

got issued Red Corner Notice by the Interpol against the petitioners on 07-12-2001 and initiated proceedings, under the Extradition Act, 1962, (for brevity 'the Act 34 of 1962'), to extradite them. Subsequently, the petitioners were arrested at USA and … of the CBI, BSFC, Bangalore, the 2nd respondent in not complying with the mandatory provisions of law viz., Section 105 and Section 105B Cri.P.C. as relates these petitioners herein, and by not serving summons or process on … Section 120-B read with 420, 467, 468 and 471 IPC and Section 13(2) read with 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947, along with

Prem Swarup Puri Vs. Delhi Administration and Union of India

Court : Delhi

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Extradition Act, 1962 - Sections 21; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : ILR1980Delhi184

bases his claim on the mandate in Article one of the decree and section 21 of the Indian Extradition Act 1962 (the Act). The Union of India, on the other hand, contend that they are entitled to try him … released after serving sentence. He preferred an appeal against his conviction to the court of session. On December 13, 1979. his appeal was allowed and conviction set aside.(3) Now the case of the petitioner is that he

Lennox James Ellis vs.union of India

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

August‟ 2016, issued by the Respondent W.P.(CRL) No.3432/ 2017 Page 1 of 45 under Section 5 of the Extradition Act‟ 1962 seeking an inquiry by the Court of the Ld. Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate 01, Patiala House Courts, New … you must cause or permit your imagination to imagine as real if incidents which, W.P.(CRL) No.3432/ 2017 Page 13 of 45 boggle when it comes to the inevitable corollaries of that state of affairs.” (emphasis supplied)” 26.