Advanced Search Results

Ram K. Mahbubani Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Extradition Act, 1962 - Sections 2, 3, 3(3), 4 to 11, 5, 6, 12 to 18, 24, 34, 34B and 1343; Extradition Act, 1870; Fugitive Offenders Act, 1881; Extradition Act, 1903; Bare Act; Extradition (Amendment) Act, 1993 - Sections 8; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 228; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 415, 417 and 420; Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908

Reported in : 153(2008)DLT471; 2008(106)DRJ906

issuance of a writ of Habeas Corpus securing the release of the Petitioner under Section 24 of the Extradition Act, 1962 ('Extradition Act' for short); secondly, for quashing of the Orders of the learned ACMM dated 31.5.2007 and 28.7.2007 … succinctly adumbrate the fasciculus comprising Sections 12 to 18 which are found in Chapter-III of the Extradition Act. Section 12 deals with the applicability of Chapter-III and not Chapter-II, along with the other provisions of the Extradition Act.

State of West Bengal Vs. Jugal Kishore More and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Fugitive Offenders Act, 1881; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 120B, 121, 121A, 122, 123, 420, 467 and 471; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 82 and 439; Extradition Act, 1962; Constitution of India - Article 227

Reported in : AIR1969SC1171; 1969CriLJ1559; (1969)1SCC440; [1969]3SCR320

of India was also without authority in the absence of a notified order Under Section 3 of the Extradition Act, 1962, and the High Court could not ignore the 'laws of the land, even to support a gesture of … Fugitive Offenders Act. In the absence of any legislation on those lines, it seems difficult to hold that Section 12 or Section 14 of the Fugitive Offenders Act has force in India by reason of the provisions of

Christian Michel James vs Union of India and Ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Right to Information

sections into the chargesheet filed against a fugitive Extradited from UAE, Ultra virus of Section 21 of the Extradition Act 1962.Digitally Signed WP(Crl) 3868/2025 Page 1 of 19b) Issue appropriate Writ order direction declaring that non application of the … the present petition isthat the Central Bureau of Investigation („CBI‟), (respondent no.4 herein) registered RC No. 217-2013-A-0003 dated 12.03.2013 under Section 120B read with Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter referred to „IPC‟) and

Rajiv Chandrakant Shah vs.union of India

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Ministry of External Affairs vide letter dated 19.02.2002 directed for an enquiry under Section 5 of the Indian Extradition Act, 1962 regarding the allegations of commission of certain offences by the petitioner within the territory of United States of … the immigration counter, IGI Airport in the night intervening between 11.01.2002 and W.P(Crl.) 1831/2017 Page 2 of 16 12.01.2002. It was thereafter that a requisition was received by the Government of India from the US Department of

Abu Salem Abdul Qayoom Ansari Vs. State of Maharashtra and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 - Sections 3(2)(i), 3(2)(ii), 3(3), 3(5), 5, 19; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 120B, 302, 307, 387, 382; Constitution of India - Article 32

Blast Case No. 1 of 1993, as violative of the Rule of Speciality and Section 21 of the Extradition Act, 1962; (d) issue a writ of Mandamus to release and discharge the writ petitioner by quashing all the proceedings … of 2007 against the order dated 16.04.2007 by the same Designated Court, framing charges against him under Sections 120B, 302, 307, 387, 382 IPC and under Sections 3(2)(i), 3(2)(ii), 3(3), 3(5) and 5 of the TADA Act.

Verhoeven, Marie-Emmanuelle Vs. Union of India Through Ministry of Ext ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Right to Information

dated 24.02.2015 of the Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Patiala House Courts, New Delhi under Section 34-B of the Extradition Act, 1962. Thereafter, accepting the extradition request dated 24.03.2015 made by the Republic of Chile, by order dated 18.05.2015 the … and (4) of Section 3 contains a different set of provisions for return of fugitive criminals. As per Section 12, even the application of Chapter III shall be by a notified order by the Central Government. 41. In

Omesh Chander Kashyap vs.union of India

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate vide order dated 31.03.2015, after a full fledged enquiry under Section 7 of the Extradition Act, 1962 (hereinafter called as „Act‟) recommended for the extradition of the petitioner to Canada, the requesting State. The W.P(Crl.) … whether a prima facie case is made out or not for surrendering a fugitive criminal. W.P(Crl.) 2899/2015 Page 12 of 30 21. The next issue involved would be as to what material would constitute evidence before a

Lennox James Ellis vs.union of India

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

August‟ 2016, issued by the Respondent W.P.(CRL) No.3432/ 2017 Page 1 of 45 under Section 5 of the Extradition Act‟ 1962 seeking an inquiry by the Court of the Ld. Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate 01, Patiala House Courts, New … which Chapter-III applies”. Chapter-III deals with the subject “Return of fugitive criminals to foreign States with extradition arrangements”.42. Section 12 - which falls in Chapter III, reads as follows: “12. Application of Chapter.- (1) This Chapter shall apply

Jayendra Vishnu Thakur Vs. State of Maharashtra and anr.

Court : Orissa

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 2009(II)OLR161

so expressly or the same must be capable of being inferred by necessary implication.There are statutes like the Extradition Act, 1962 which excludes taking of evidence viz-a-viz opinion. (See - Sarabjit Rick Singh v. Union of India : (2008) … the said Act shall be triable only by the Designated Court within whose local jurisdiction it was committed. Section 12 empowers the Designated Court to try any other offence, at the same trial, with which the accused may

Verhoeven, Marie-Emmanuelle Vs. Union of India and Ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Right to Information

order is purported to have been issued in exercise of powers conferred by Section 4(1) of the Indian Extradition Act, 1962. Section 4(1) has no relevance to the context. What is relevant is Section 3(1) of the Act. The third … or persons administering the government of a British possession, and includes the governor of any part of India.” 12. Section 18 of the 1870 Act provided for the saving of laws of British possessions. In other words,