Advanced Search Results
Bhavesh Jayanti Lakhani Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.
Supreme Court of India
Aug-07-2009
Criminal
Extradition Act, 1962 - Sections 2, 3, 5, 6, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 29 and 34B; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 41, 41(1), 105A to 105L and 154; Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946 - Sections 3, 5; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) (Amendment) Act, 1993; Foreigners Act; Delhi Special Police Ordinance, 1946; Police Act, 1861; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 13 and 44A; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 363, 363A, 365 and 368; Punjab Police Rules; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19, 21, 32, 73 and 226; Madhya Pradesh Police Regulations
2009(5)LHSC2857; JT2009(11)SC279; 2009(11)SCALE467; (2009)9SCC551; 2009AIRSCW6309
there shall be no order as to costs. - Interpol Notice: [S.B. Sinha & Dr. Mukundakam Sharma, JJ] Extradition Act, 1962, Section 6, 16, 34-B and 15 - Matrimonial Dispute - Whether the CBI established under the DPSE Act has … the roles and responsibilities of the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) vis--vis the provisions of the Extradition Act, 1962 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') is involved in this appeal. It arises out of a judgment and
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBansil Mutei Shiblaq Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Delhi
Apr-17-2007
Criminal
Extradition Act, 1962 - Sections 4, 5, 7, 7(3), 7(4), 9, 34B, 34B(1), 34B(2), 34B(3) and 34(2); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 397; Constitution of India - Article 21
2007(96)DRJ120
the Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate (ACMM) dated 21-3-2007, rejecting his application for discharge under Section 34-B(2) of the Extradition Act, 1962 (hereafter 'the Act').2. The facts necessary to decide the petition are that the petitioner, a UK national, professes … Chief Metropolitan Magistrate (ACMM) dated 21-3-2007, rejecting his application for discharge under Section 34-B(2) of the Extradition Act, 1962 (hereafter 'the Act').2. The facts necessary to decide the petition are that the petitioner, a UK national, professes
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPercept D'Markr (India) Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Zaheer Khan and Anr.
Supreme Court of India
Mar-22-2006
ArbitrationContract
Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 27; Companies Act, 1956; Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 9 and 36; Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 14, 14(1), 41 and 42; Arbitration and Conciliation Rules
AIR2006SC3426; 2006(2)ARBLR34(SC); 2006(2)AWC1869(SC); 2006(5)BomCR322; (2006)5CompLJ224(SC); 2006(1)CTLJ100(SC); (2006)4MLJ1695; 2006(3)SCALE324; (2006)4SCC227
agent, someone in whom he had lost confidence - Interpol Notice: [S.B. Sinha & Dr. Mukundakam Sharma, JJ] Extradition Act, 1962, Section 6, 16, 34-B and 15 - Matrimonial Dispute - Whether the CBI established under the DPSE Act has … AR. Lakshmanan, J.1. The above appeals were filed from the common final judgment and order dated 19.12.2003 passed in Appeal No. 1109/2003 in Arbitration Petition No. 514/2003 and Appeal No. 1110/2003 in Arbitration Petition No.
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Narendra Gudgud Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation (Eow)
Kolkata
May-06-2009
Criminal
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Section 13(1) and 13(2); ;Provisions of the Extradition Act, 1962 - Sections 19 and 36; ;Copyright Act; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 120B and 420; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Section 75; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 70, 77, 78, 79 and 482; ;Indian Law; ;Constitution of India - Articles 2, 9, 10 and 12
2009CriLJ4278
but is now in the USA the judiciary does not have any role to play. Provisions of the Extradition Act, 1962 and the Extradition Treaty between the USA and India would clearly reveal that the extradition proceedings can only … ORDERPartha Sakha Datta, J.1. The petitioner who is an accused in Special Case No. 02 of 2001 under Section 120B read with Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code and under Section 13(1)(d) and Section 13(2) of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSalwant Singh Sandhu Vs. State of Delhi and Others
Delhi
Apr-23-2001
Criminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 439; Extradition Act, 1962 - Sections 4, 5, 6, 9, 25, 34, 41(1) and 43(2); Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 420
2001IVAD(Delhi)576; 2001CriLJ3030; 91(2001)DLT577; 2001(59)DRJ116
the Code of Criminal Procedure (hereinafter referred to as 'the Code' only) read with Section 25 of the Extradition Act, 1962 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act' only) is for grant of bail to the petitioner arrested under Section … of Criminal Procedure (hereinafter referred to as 'the Code' only) read with Section 25 of the Extradition Act, 1962 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act' only) is for grant of bail to the petitioner arrested under Section
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRam K. Mahbubani Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.
Delhi
Sep-12-2008
Criminal
Indian Extradition Act, 1962 - Sections 2, 3, 3(3), 4 to 11, 5, 6, 12 to 18, 24, 34, 34B and 1343; Extradition Act, 1870; Fugitive Offenders Act, 1881; Extradition Act, 1903; Bare Act; Extradition (Amendment) Act, 1993 - Sections 8; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 228; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 415, 417 and 420; Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908
153(2008)DLT471; 2008(106)DRJ906
issuance of a writ of Habeas Corpus securing the release of the Petitioner under Section 24 of the Extradition Act, 1962 ('Extradition Act' for short); secondly, for quashing of the Orders of the learned ACMM dated 31.5.2007 and 28.7.2007 … a writ of Habeas Corpus securing the release of the Petitioner under Section 24 of the Extradition Act, 1962 ('Extradition Act' for short); secondly, for quashing of the Orders of the learned ACMM dated 31.5.2007 and 28.7.2007
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJugal Kishore More Vs. Chief Presidency Magistrate Calcutta and ors.
Kolkata
Apr-20-1967
Criminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 46, 75 to 86, 186 to 189, 403, 429, 439, 514 and 555; ;Constitution of India - Articles 21, 73, 227 and 394; ;Extradition Act, 1962 - Sections 2, 3(1), 19, 35 and 37; ;Fugitive Offenders Act, 1881 - Sections 13 and 26; ;General Clauses Act, 1897 - Section 3; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 3, 4, 120B, 216, 420, 467 and 471
AIR1968Cal220,1968CriLJ604,71CWN508
strongly contended by Mr. Dutt in the very fact that after the Supreme Court decision and beforeenactment of Extradition Act, 1962, instructions were given' as above. But his Lordship finds 'an incorrectitude' in instruction (b) just reproduced, which, to … Bijayesh Mukherjee, J. 1. This is a case laid before me under Section 439, Sub-section (1), read with Section 429, of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 5 of 1898, with the divided opinions of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNiranjan Patel Vs. Uoi
Delhi
Apr-17-2012
Land Acquisition
passed by the learned Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate-01, Patiala House Courts, New Delhi under Section 5 of the Extradition Act, 1962 in CC. No.79/1/08 whereby the learned Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate recommended extradition of the Petitioner to the United
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskFlemming LudIn Larsen Vs. Union of India
Delhi
May-31-1999
Narcotics
Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Extradition Act, 1962 - Sections 5 and 7(1); Narcotic Drugs Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 36-A
1999IVAD(Delhi)447; 1999CriLJ3114; 80(1999)DLT324; 1999(50)DRJ507
New Delhi, to issue a provisional warrant for the arrest of the petitioner under section 34B(1) of the Extradition ACt, 1962 (for short 'the Act). Acceding to the request the learned A.C.M.M, New Delhi, on August 12, 1997 issued
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskOm Prakash Srivastava Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.
Supreme Court of India
Jul-24-2006
Criminal
Extradition Act, 1962 - Sections 21; Constitution of India - Article 226 and 226(2); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 20 - Order 11, Rule 2
131(2006)DLT557(SC); JT2006(7)SC35; 2006(7)SCALE318; (2006)6SCC207; 2006(2)LC953(SC)
facing trial in eight cases which is in complete violation of the provisions of Section 21 of the Extradition Act, 1962 (in short the 'Extradition Act'). He had also pleaded that he was being kept in solitary confinement without … in eight cases which is in complete violation of the provisions of Section 21 of the Extradition Act, 1962 (in short the 'Extradition Act'). He had also pleaded that he was being kept in solitary confinement without
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »