Advanced Search Results

Jameel Ahmed and anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : CriminalNarcotics

Acts : Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 - Sections 3(3), 6, 6(1), 15, 15(1) and 15(3); Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 120B and 286; Expolsive Substances Act - Sections 4, 5 and 6; Explosives Act, 1884 - Sections 9B and 9C; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 229 and 313; Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Rules - Rule 15 and 15(5); Evidence Act - Sections 24 to 30

Reported in : JT2003(4)SC294; RLW2003(3)SC424; 2003(4)SCALE402; (2003)9SCC673; 2003(2)LC993(SC)

Substances Act. Learned Judge also held A-5 guilty of offences punishable under Sections 9B(i)(b) and 9C of the Explosives Act. Based on the said conviction, he imposed a sentence of 5 years' RI with a fine of Rs. … 3 months. Nextly, he held A-5 guilty of offences punishable under Sections 9B(i)(b) and 9C of the Explosive Act, 1884 and sentenced him to undergo RI for 2 years with a fine of Rs. 500/-; in default to … by the Deputy Superintendent of Police, CBI/SIC.II, New Delhi for offences under Sections 3(3) and 6 of the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987

Vijay Madanlal Choudhary Vs. Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881; (iv) Section 9 of the Opium Act, 1878; (v) Section 9B of the Explosives Act 1884; (vi) Section 7 of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954; (vii) Section 10C of the Essential Commodities

State of R Vs. Bhagwan Das Agrawal and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

the subsequent and third FIR registered in Dholpur (Rajasthan) as Crime No.427/2010 under Section 5/9B, 9C of the Explosives Act, 1884, in view of the provisions of Section 186 of Cr.P.C., be discontinued, was allowed, the appellant-State of Rajasthan