Advanced Search Results

Yakub Abdul Razak Memon. Vs. the State of Maharashtra, Through Cbi , B ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 - Sections 19, 3(3), 3(2)(i)(ii), 3(3)(4), 5, 6; Evidence Act, 1872 - Section 27; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 302, 307, 326, 324, 427, 435, 436, 201, 212, 120B; Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 3, 7, 25 (1-A), (1-B)(a); Explosives Act, 1884 - Sections 9B (1)(a)(b)(c); Explosive Substances Act, 1908 - Sections 3, 4(a)(b), 5, 6

read with Sections 25 (1-A), (1-B)(a) of the Arms Act, 1959, Sections 9B (1)(a)(b)(c) of the Explosives Act, 1884, Sections 3, 4(a)(b), 5 and 6 … sentences for the offences under TADA, the Indian PenalCode, 1860 (in short 'IPC') Arms Act, 1959 and the Explosives Act, 1884.By way of impugned judgment, the trial Court has convicted 100 persons andacquitted 23 persons of all the charges. … TADA') forBombay Bomb Blast Case, Greater Bombay in BBC No. 1 of 1993. These appealshave been filed under Section 19 of the TADA by the accused against theirconviction and sentence and by the CBI for confirmation of

Sanjay Dutt and ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra, Through Cbi (Stf), Bomb ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act (TADA Act), 1987 - Sections 3(2)(i)(ii), 3(3)(4), 2, 5, 6; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 302, 307, 326, 324, 427, 435, 436, 201, 212; Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 25 (1-A), (1-B)(a), 3, 7; Explosives Act, 1884 - Sections 9B (1)(a)(b)(c); Explosive Substances Act, 1908 - Sections 3, 4(a)(b), 5, 6; Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act, 1984 - Section 4

and 7 read with Sections 25 (1-A), (1-B)(a) of the Arms Act, 1959, Sections 9B (1)(a)(b)(c) of the Explosives Act, 1884, Sections 3, 4(a)(b), 5 and 6 of the Explosive Substances Act, 1908 and Section 4 of the Prevention

Francis Xavier Salemao S/O David Salemao Vs. State Through the Public ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Explosives Act, 1884 - Sections 9B(1); Explosive Substances Act, 1908 - Sections 5, 7; Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 3, 5, 25 and 35; Explosive Substances Act, 1905 - Sections 5; Explosives Rules, 1983

Reported in : 2007BomCR(Cri)847

J.1. This appeal is by the accused who has been convicted and sentenced under Section 9B(1)(b) of the Explosives Act, 1884(Act, for short) for having been found in possession of 9 non electrical detonators and 31 electrical detonators(item Nos.

Jameel Ahmed and anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : CriminalNarcotics

Acts : Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 - Sections 3(3), 6, 6(1), 15, 15(1) and 15(3); Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 120B and 286; Expolsive Substances Act - Sections 4, 5 and 6; Explosives Act, 1884 - Sections 9B and 9C; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 229 and 313; Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Rules - Rule 15 and 15(5); Evidence Act - Sections 24 to 30

Reported in : JT2003(4)SC294; RLW2003(3)SC424; 2003(4)SCALE402; (2003)9SCC673; 2003(2)LC993(SC)

Substances Act. Learned Judge also held A-5 guilty of offences punishable under Sections 9B(i)(b) and 9C of the Explosives Act. Based on the said conviction, he imposed a sentence of 5 years' RI with a fine of Rs. … 3 months. Nextly, he held A-5 guilty of offences punishable under Sections 9B(i)(b) and 9C of the Explosive Act, 1884 and sentenced him to undergo RI for 2 years with a fine of Rs. 500/-; in default to … as 'the TADA Act'), Section 120B IPC; and Sections 5 and 6 of the Explosive Substances Act and Section 9B and 9C of the Explosive Act. After trial the Designated Court held the appellants guilty of offences punishable

Lopchand Naruji Jat and anr. Vs. State of Gujarat

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Explosive Act, 1884 - Sections 4 and 9B; Terrorists and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1985 - Sections 5; Explosives Rules, 1983; Explosive Substances Act, 1908

Reported in : 2004(2)ALD(Cri)903; 2004CriLJ4241; [2004(4)JCR156(SC)]; JT2004(8)SC226; 2004(7)SCALE644; (2004)7SCC566; 2005(1)LC82(SC)

proceedings were illegal. It was also submitted that articles recovered from the appellants cannot be said to be explosives and, therefore, also the appellants could not have been convicted. As there was no independent evidence and only … Judge of the Gujarat High Court upholding their conviction for offence punishable under Section 9B(i)(b) of the Explosive Act 1884 (in short the 'Act'). The Trial Court sentenced each of the appellants to undergo imprisonment for one year

Manafudeen Vs. State of Kerala, Represented By The Public Prosecutor, ...

Court : Kerala

Subject : Land Acquisition

seeking to quash Annexure F charge sheet laid against the petitioner alleging offence punishable under S.9B(1) of The Explosives Act, 1884. 2. The prosecution allegation is that, on 07.08.2013, the petitioner was found in possession of 25 bundles of … would clearly rule out the assertions of the 2nd respondent that the petitioner had committed an offence under section 9B (1) of the Explosives Act or that he had violated any provisions of the rules framed thereunder. In

Shyam Sunder Vs. the State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 2007(3)WLN95

IPC. However, SHO Madan Dan Singh investigated the case and filed challan Under Section 9B of the Explosive Act, 1884 against respondents No.2 and 3 accused and also for the offence Under Sections 286, 337, 338 and 304A … petition by the petitioner that on 5.5.1999 when the van of respondent No. 2 Kailash Chand Jhanwar carrying explosive substance in a huge quantity being unloaded in 'Nohra' of respondent No.2, at that time due to explosion

Durga Prasad Gupta Vs. the State of Rajasthan Through C.B.i.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Explosive Substances Act, 1908 - Sections 3, 4, 5 and 6; Explosives Act, 1884 - Sections 9B; ;Explosives Rules, 1983 - Rule 115; ;Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 - Sections 3(1), 3(3), 4, 5, 6 and 18; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 120B

Reported in : 97(2004)CLT489(SC); JT2003(Suppl1)SC586; 2003(8)SCALE107; (2003)12SCC257; 2004(1)LC62(SC)

4 and 5 of the Explosive Substances Act, 1908 (in short the 'Explosive Act') and Section 9B of Explosives Act, 1884 (in short the 'Act') read with Rule 115 of the Explosives Rules, 1983 (in short the 'Rules'). 2.

State of H.P. Vs. Lal Singh and anr.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Cr. Case No. 17/3 of 2001/2000, acquitting the respondents for the offence punishable under Section 9B of the Explosives Act, 1884( for short Act).2. The prosecution case, in brief, is that PW-7 HC Kalyan Singh along with police party

Harpal Singh Vs. State of Punjab

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 - Sections 3, 3(1), 4, 5, 9, 9(1), 11, 11(1), 12, 12(1), 18, 19, 20A, 20A(1) and 20A(2); Explosive Substances Act, 1908 - Sections 5; Arms Act - Sections 25; Explosives Act, 1884 - Sections 4, 5 and 9B; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34 and 302; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC)

Reported in : AIR2008SC743; 2007AIRSCW7897; 2008(1)Crimes82; 2008(2)KCCRSN104

in the court on 24.2.1994 for prosecution of the appellant under Sections 4, 5, and 9B(b) of the Explosives Act, 1884. There was no mention of any offence under TADA or under the Explosive Substances Act, 1908. The charge-sheet … G.P. Mathur, J.1. This Appeal has been preferred under Section 19 of the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 against the judgment and order dated 16.3.2007 of