Advanced Search Results

Yakub Abdul Razak Memon. Vs. the State of Maharashtra, Through Cbi , B ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 - Sections 19, 3(3), 3(2)(i)(ii), 3(3)(4), 5, 6; Evidence Act, 1872 - Section 27; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 302, 307, 326, 324, 427, 435, 436, 201, 212, 120B; Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 3, 7, 25 (1-A), (1-B)(a); Explosives Act, 1884 - Sections 9B (1)(a)(b)(c); Explosive Substances Act, 1908 - Sections 3, 4(a)(b), 5, 6

sentences for the offences under TADA, the Indian PenalCode, 1860 (in short 'IPC') Arms Act, 1959 and the Explosives Act, 1884.By way of impugned judgment, the trial Court has convicted 100 persons andacquitted 23 persons of all the charges. … TADA') forBombay Bomb Blast Case, Greater Bombay in BBC No. 1 of 1993. These appealshave been filed under Section 19 of the TADA by the accused against theirconviction and sentence and by the CBI for confirmation of … Hotel. In the abovesaid incident of serialbombings, 257 human lives were lost, 713 persons were seriously injured andproperties worth about Rs. 27 crores were destroyed.

Sanjay Dutt and ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra, Through Cbi (Stf), Bomb ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act (TADA Act), 1987 - Sections 3(2)(i)(ii), 3(3)(4), 2, 5, 6; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 302, 307, 326, 324, 427, 435, 436, 201, 212; Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 25 (1-A), (1-B)(a), 3, 7; Explosives Act, 1884 - Sections 9B (1)(a)(b)(c); Explosive Substances Act, 1908 - Sections 3, 4(a)(b), 5, 6; Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act, 1984 - Section 4

and 7 read with Sections 25 (1-A), (1-B)(a) of the Arms Act, 1959, Sections 9B (1)(a)(b)(c) of the Explosives Act, 1884, Sections 3, 4(a)(b), 5 and 6 of the Explosive Substances Act, 1908 and Section 4 of the Prevention

Dr. Pradeep Kumar Vs. the Chief Controller of Explosives, Nagpur and o ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Property

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Explosives Act, 1884 - Sections 4, 5, 7 and 17; Explosives Rules, 1940 - Rules 81, 84, 85, 86 and 88; Gas Cylinders Rules, 1940 - Rule 1

Reported in : AIR1976All266

(1), dated the 28th September, 1938. In exercise of the powers conferred by Section 17 of the Indian Explosives Act, 1884 (4 of 1884), the Central Government is pleased to declare that any gas when compressed in any metal … (f) the exemption absolutely or subject to conditions of any explosives from the operation of the rules.' 6. Section 7 of the Indian Explosives Act also authorises the Central Government to make rules consistent with the above rules

Essa @ Anjum Abdul Razak Memon Vs. State of Maharashtra Tr.Stf,cbi Mum ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

and 7 read with Sections 25 (1A), (1B)(a) of the Arms Act, 1959, Sections 9B (1)(a)(b)(c) of the Explosives Act, 1884, Sections 3, 4(a)(b), 5 and 6 of the Explosive Substances Act, 1908 and Section 4 of the Prevention

Raees-uz-zama and anr. Vs. State Nct of Delhi

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

section 146 (1)] Part I CENTRAL ACTS 1 The Press and Registration of Books Act, 1867.2. The Indian Explosives Act, 1884.3. The Indian Lunacy Act, 1912.4. The Poisons Act, 1919.5. The Police (Incitement to Disaffection) Act, 1922.6. The Cinematograph … preparation to commit an offence punishable. It follows therefore that the appellants should not have been convicted under Section 7 of the Essential Commodities Act. (emphasis supplied) 92. In State of Maharashtra v. Mohd.Yakub (1980) 3 SCC 57.silver

Bimal Kaur Khalsa Vs. Union of India and ors. Overruled

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1985 - Sections 3(2), 7, 8, 9(2), 13(2), 13(3), 16 and 17; Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention Ordinance, 1987; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 151; Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) (Amendment) Act, 1987 - Sections 9, 10, 11(2), 16, 19 and 20; Arms Act, 1959; Explosives Act, 1884; Explosive Substances Act, 1908

Reported in : AIR1988P&H95

Act provides for enhanced penalties for offences resulting from contravention of the provisions of Arms Act, 1959. the Explosives Act, 1884, the Explosive Substances Act. 1908 or the Inflammable Substances Act. 1952, if the accused contravened the provisions of … see bellow) The Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1985: The Terrorist and disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act. 1987: Section 7 Section 8. Section 9(2) Section 13 Section 16 Section 17(2) Section 17(4) Section 17(5) = Section 9 =

Simranjit Singh Mann Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : CriminalConstitution

Acts : Prevention of Terrorism Act, 2002 - Sections 2, 3(5), 5, 6, 7, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23 to 35 and 36 to 64; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 167, 438; Contravention of the Provisions of the Explosive Act, 1884 - Sections 4; Explosive Substances Act, 1908; Inflammable Substances Act, 1952; Arms Act, 1959; Constitution of India, 1950 - Articles 14 and 21

Reported in : 2002CriLJ3368

2000 crores is reported to have been damaged. Almost 437600 kg. Of explosives, mostly RDX, had been inducted and 61900 sophisticated weapons had been smuggled … or chemical substance of warfare is made punishable under Section 4. Contravention of the Provisions of the Explosive Act, 1884, the Explosive Substances Act, 1908, the Inflammable Substances Act, 1952, the Arms Act, 1959 with an 'intent to … a terrorist organization....' The holding of the proceeds of any terrorist act is made punishable under Clause 6. Sub-section (7) is intended to ensure a free and fair trial. It provides for the award of penalty to a

Yakub Abdul Razak Memon Vs. State of Maharashtra Th:cbi Mumbai

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

for the offences under TADA, the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short ‘IPC’) Arms Act, 1959 and the Explosives Act, 1884. By way of impugned judgment, the trial Court has convicted 100 persons and acquitted 23 persons of all … for Bombay Bomb Blast Case, Greater Bombay in BBC No.1 of 1993. These appeals have been filed under Section 19 of the TADA by the accused against their conviction and sentence and by the CBI for confirmation … In the abovesaid incident of serial bombings, 257 human lives were lost, 713 persons were seriously injured and properties worth about Rs. 27 crores were

Mohammed Ajmal Mohammad Amir Kasab Alias Abu Mujahid and Others Vs. St ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : CriminalConstitution

Acts : Explosive Substance Act, 1908 ; Code of Criminal Procedure(CrPC) 1973 - Section 366, 164(1)(2)(4), 163, 162, 161(2), 304, 315, 226, 229, 313, 39; Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 - Section 16, 15; Explosives Act, 1884 ; Arms Act, 1959.; Indian Evidence Act, 1872 - Section 24, 25, 26, 27, 145, 32(1), 10; Constitution Of India - Article 20(3), 21, 22 (1), 156, 61, 219, 216, 217, 310, 309, 444, 3, 5, 7, 9, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 23, 25, 29, 32, 33, 427, 428, 517,; Prevention of Terrorism Act, 2002 - Sections 32, 52; Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 - Section 5(1) (2),; Indian Penal Code(IPC) - Sections 161, 165, 120-B,109, 179, 121A, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 176; Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987 ; (THE) Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (TADA) Act, 43 of 1993 - Section 32,

Reported in : (2012)9SCC1; JT2012(8)SC4; 2012(4)KCCR271(SN); 2012AIRSCW4942; AIR2012SC3565; 2012(7)SCALE553

terrorist act punishable under Section 16 of Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967, as well as offences under the Explosives Act, 1884, Explosive Substances Act, 1908, and Arms Act, 1959.265. Nothing will please Mr. Raju Ramachandran, senior counsel appearing for … order passed by the trial court, one by the appellant against his conviction and sentences (Criminal Appeal No. 738 of 2010) and the other by the State of Maharashtra against the acquittal of the other two accused

Lalit Chandra Chanda Chowdhury Vs. Emperor

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : (1912)ILR39Cal119,15Ind.Cas.65

not under the Code of Criminal Procedure, but under Rule 32 of the Government Rules under the Indian Explosives Act, 1884 (see pp. 396, 397, Vol. IV, General Statutory Rules and Orders, Ed. 1910). At the search, on the … another complaint before the Additional District Magistrate of Dacca, together with the Government sanction, or consent, required by Section 7 of the Explosive Substances Act (VI of 1908). On this complaint and sanction the proceedings, resulting in the