Advanced Search Results

M/s. Confidence Petroleum India Ltd., Vs The Chief Controller of Explo ...

Court : Chennai

consider and Dispose of the Statutory Appeal and Stay petition dated 10.02.2026 filed under Section 6F of the Explosives Act, 1884 read with Rule 59 (1) (a) of the Static and Mobile pressure Vessels (unfired) Rules, 2016 by the

Robins Joseph vs the Deputy Chief Controller of Explosives

Court : Kerala

W.P.(C).No.1138/2021 :: 2 ::JUDGMENTThe petitioner has approached this Court challengingExts.P5 and P6 orders passed against him under the Explosives Act, 1884. Although various contentions are raised in the writ petition, in its challenge against Ext.P5 and P6 orders, I … that against the said orders, the petitioner has an effective alternate remedy by way of an appeal under Section 6F of the Explosives Act read with Rule 121 of the Explosives Rules, 2008. Accordingly, without prejudice to the

Sasindran Vs. Addl. District Magistrate

Court : Kerala

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Explosives Act, 1884 - Sections 9(B)(1); Explosive Substances Act, 1908 - Sections 6, 6E, 6E(1), 6E(3), 6E(6), 6F; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 286 and 304; ; Explosives Rule, 1983 - Rule 165, 167 and 167(2)

Reported in : 2006(4)KLT662

P-2 and P-3 orders passed by the statutory authorities suspending the licence issued to the petitioner under the Explosives Act, 1884 (for short, 'the Act') legally valid and sustainable2. The above question has arisen for consideration in this Writ … as Ext.P2.5. The above order was challenged by the petitioner before respondent No.2 in a statutory appeal under Section 6F of the Act, On September 29,2004, the appellate authority (respondent No.2) passed Ext.P3 order. In the said order

Swaminathan.M.N vs the Commissioner for Land Revenue,

Court : Kerala

the 2nd respondent has been passed in violation of the provisions of Section 6 E (3) of the Explosives Act, 1884 as well as the Explosive Rules. It is submitted that the petitioner admittedly had a licence under the … HONOURABLE COURT EXHIBIT P6 A TRUE COPY OF THE MEMORANDUM OF APPEAL 04.08.2020 PREFERRED BY THE PETITIONER UNDER SECTION 6F OF THE EXPLOSIVE ACT, 1894 R/W RULE 121 OF THE EXPLOSIVE RULESRESPONDENT'S/S EXHIBITS: NIL

State of H.P. Vs. Lal Singh and anr.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Cr. Case No. 17/3 of 2001/2000, acquitting the respondents for the offence punishable under Section 9B of the Explosives Act, 1884( for short Act).2. The prosecution case, in brief, is that PW-7 HC Kalyan Singh along with police party … period for which licences are to remain in force;(ee) the authority to which appeals may be preferred under Section 6F, the procedure to be followed by such authority and the period within which appeals shall be preferred, the