Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: explosives act 1884 section 6e · Page 1 of about 7 results (0.015 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Aug 11 2016

M/s. Sri Amman Chemicals Vs. The Chief Controller of Explosives, Petro ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Aug-11-2016

Subject : Customs

is not an item falling within the scope of Explosives and special type of Explosives spoken under the Explosives Act and has been separately defined under Rule 2(b) of the Rules. Therefore, the power under Section 6E(3)(d) of … store and trade in Ammonium Nitrate in terms of Ammonium Nitrate Rules, 2015, (Rules), framed under the Explosive Act, 1884, (Act). The petitioner applied for grant of licence in Form P-5 for import licence of Ammonium Nitrate, which

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 01 2014

C.Gangadharan Vs. the Additional District Magistrate

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Jan-01-2014

Subject : Education

be any cancellation or suspension of the licence by virtue of the mandate under Section 6E of the Explosives Act, 1884 and hence the writ petition.2. The learned Government Pleader points out that, Ext.P6 is only a show-cause notice

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 14 2005

Sasindran Vs. Addl. District Magistrate

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Dec-14-2005

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Explosives Act, 1884 - Sections 9(B)(1); Explosive Substances Act, 1908 - Sections 6, 6E, 6E(1), 6E(3), 6E(6), 6F; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 286 and 304; ; Explosives Rule, 1983 - Rule 165, 167 and 167(2)

Reported in : 2006(4)KLT662

P-2 and P-3 orders passed by the statutory authorities suspending the licence issued to the petitioner under the Explosives Act, 1884 (for short, 'the Act') legally valid and sustainable2. The above question has arisen for consideration in this Writ … my view, is totally misconceived.8. In this context it is pertinent to refer to the relevant provisions of Section 6E of the Act, which read thus:6E. Variation, suspension and revocation of licences.(1) The licensing authority may vary the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jan 15 2024

P.V.Rajan vs the Joint Chief Controller of Explosives

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Jan-15-2024

any other W.P.(C)No.12161/2015 3appropriate writ, order or direction, directing the respondents not to invoke the penalty clauses of Section 6E of the Explosives Act and Rule 118(5) of the Explosives Rules till the Criminal Court passed final verdict … FOLLOWING: W.P.(C)No.12161/2015 2JUDGMENTThe petitioner had obtained licences to store, sell and transport explosives under the provisions of the Explosives Act,1884 and read with provisions contained in the ExplosivesRules, 2008. Exts.P5 to P7 notices have been issued to the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 16 2014

Satyanarayan Vs. State and anr

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

Decided on : Oct-16-2014

Subject : MRTP

Police Commissioner, while passing the order impugned, has observed that a case under Sections 5, 9B(i) of the Explosives Act, 1884 (for short, Act of 1884’) and Section 286 of the Indian Penal Code is pending against 2 the … quashed. In view of law laid down by the Division Bench and provisions contained under sub-section (6) of Section 6E of the Act of 1884 read with Rule 118 of the Explosive Rules 2008, the reasons assigned in

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 16 2014

Ramesh Chandra Lohiya Vs. State and anr

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

Decided on : Oct-16-2014

Subject : MRTP

set out a ground for suspension of licence of explosives. 4 The provisions contained under sub-section (6) of Section 6E of the Act of 1884 are also clear, wherein it is envisaged that licence can be suspended if … The Police Commissioner, while passing the order impugned, has observed that two cases under Sections 5/9B(1)(B) of the Explosives Act, 1884 (for short, 2 Act of 1884’) and Section 286 of the Indian Penal Code are pending against the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 16 2014

Tahir Ali Ansari Vs. State and ors

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

Decided on : Oct-16-2014

Subject : MRTP

4 set out a ground for suspension of licence of explosives. The provisions contained under sub-section (6) of Section 6E of the Act of 1884 are also clear, wherein it is envisaged that licence can be suspended if … The Police Commissioner, while passing the order impugned, has observed that a case under Section 9B of the Explosives Act, 1884 (for short, Act of 1884’) and Sections 286, 336 of the Indian Penal Code is pending 2 against

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial